159
Comments (13)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
Kriptskeeper 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yea we don’t need anything like that for we are a “Diverse” Army and we care about feelings so we are better then them.

4
GaryJackson 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's only 2 reasons you care more about diversity in the army then developing new technology.

  1. You're dumb and don't understand that developing weapons and armor is what makes or breaks and army's success on the battlefield.
  2. You're a conniving opportunist and want to weaken a country's army by diluting the composition with people that are unfit. Not saying that all trans and women are unfit. Generally speaking though most are not fit so serve either physically or mentally. I think it's good that most trannies don't even want to serve anyway but I just wouldn't give them the opportunity to muddy the waters. To be honest having to deal with a person's sexual orientation makes it difficult to sort out troops into functional divisions. If half the unit doesn't want to deal with a couple of their fellow soldiers then it makes it that much harder to issue orders.
2
Kriptskeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

My comment was satire. Next time I’ll put the /s to make it more clear for those who can’t see through the lines...

2
GaryJackson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ohh no. I got what you were saying. I was just reinforcing the point and calling it like I see it.