157
Comments (8)
sorted by:
6
Gnometard 6 points ago +6 / -0

This has been publicly available knowledge for longer than coming out in August.

The issue is NOBODY wanted to look at the actual data. EVERYONE wanted to trust the news and social media. When hearing about the virus initially I only looked for data, not the media.

Let's not forget they TOLD US LOUDLY, CLEARLY, AND REPETITIVELY in press conferences that they WERE GOING TO COUNT EVERYTHING THEY COULD AS COVID DEATHS.

We gotta work on the memory of folks.

3
Brellin 3 points ago +3 / -0

It doesn't help that the CDC seems to have set up their website to be as confusing and difficult to navigate as possible. You'd think that since covid is "so important" that they'd make it very easy to navigate to the pages where they list the number of deaths by both age category and also by comorbidities (they're listed in the same graph and updated daily, I know because I've seen it) but instead it seems as if they've purposely made it as difficult as possible in order to actually find that data.

4
klmd [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

CDC Quietly Reports 6% Actually Died from COVID – That’s 9,210 Deaths!

https://sarahwestall.com/breaking-cdc-quietly-reports-6-actually-died-from-covid-thats-9210-deaths/

2
Bonami 2 points ago +2 / -0

From an earlier post: WHAT WE'RE DEALING WITH IS JUST ANOTHER FLU STRAIN - THERE IS NO COVID-19 -- Dr. Derick Knauss

"I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 'supposed' positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under a SEM, we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples."

  • 1,500 "suuposed" COVID samples tested.
  • Most samples were found to be Influenza A.
  • A small percentage of cases found to be Influenza B.
  • Not one single case of COVID found among the samples tested.
  • Samples sent to Stanford, Cornell and University of California labs.
  • They failed to find one single case of COVID in the samples as well.
  • A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.
  • Four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. *All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS.
  • Seven universities are now suing the CDC as they have not seen one single case of COVID in any samples.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/clinical-lab-scientist-covid-19-fake-wake-up-america/5737013

2
Greg867 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just went to look. 404 error

2
Bonami 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was fast. It was posted on Google, can't find another link will keep looking.

2
Greg867 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks pede

1
Destroy_WithLove 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone call fall for a good line of bullshit. Anyone and everyone is capable of being hoaxed. But not in your area of expertise! If you're a car salesman, you shouldn't get taken in when buying a car.

The initial waves of misinformation and disinformation had most confused. But Fauci and Birx should have known better. They didn't understand the problem with predictive models? They didn't think to check the credentials of the guy who authored the work? They didn't ask the basic bullshit detection questions they'd ask at a conference?

They are either incomprehensibly inept or absolutely evil.