Comments (1)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
cincydan [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

expect their to be some variation in the total amount of votes switched between the candidates. In other words, there would NOT have been an exact number. For example, Biden would have got +50 and Trump would have received -51 due to the small deviation from the exact 2/3rds ration. But they realized that they could not do this, because this would have been WAY too obvious. They also realized (originally) that the vote totals had to match, otherwise there would also be suspicion. The ONLY way to do this would be to calculate the number of votes to switch from the TOTALS batch across all precincts, and then redistribute them back to each precinct with the correct grand totals so as not to raise suspicion. What they did NOT expect was for there to be audits on the precinct level. Or for there to be only ONE vote in a particular precinct. EVERY CASE, ACROSS EVERY ELECTION WHERE YOU HAVE SEEN VOTE TOTALS SWITH IN EXACT NUMBERS, IS A CASE WHERE THE VOTES WERE BEING SWITCHED FROM AN OUTSIDE SOURCE. THIS WAS NATIONWIDE, WE WERE JUST LUCKY ENOUGH TO NOTICE THE FEW THAT WERE BEING DISPLAYED REALTIME ON THE NEWS NETWORKS. THIS INCLUDES THE PREVIOUS YEARS ELECTIONS, LIKE THE VOTE SWITCHING THAT OCCURED IN THE KENTUCKY GOVERNOR'S ELECTION IN 2019 THAT WAS ALSO RECORDED LIVE. THE FRAUD IS PERVASIVE, NATIONWIDE, WORLDWIDE, AND HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A LONG, LONG TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!