We've already seen the media label Trump supporters, who support the activities at the Capitol, to ISIS. Is it possible ISIS isn't as bad and evil as the media makes them out to be?
Are they just the based patriots of the Middle East? Maybe they just want the US out of their region, and the US is framing them and painting them to be terrorists. Maybe any attacks on innocent civilians are simply US created false flags?
I just know if say China for example, was in the US, I know all of us here would probably form a similar "rebellion" against them... and they would probably have propaganda calling us terrorists as well.
Could this be accurate to how things really are?
There's a reason Obama called ISIS by the name ISIL. Fervently. Until long after even ISIS had dropped the name.
"Islamic State in the Levant" sort of means the same thing ... unless you use some older, more generous maps/ideas of what "The Levant" is. The idea of "The Caliphate" resonates...
He basically felt he got naming rights from how much he was helping and supporting, and "Levant" is far more ambitious than "Syria".
This boggles the mind. But. There are a lot of small supporting dots.Any pattern you make connecting said dots is immediately "A conspiracy theory", but the dots are never disproven.
The simplest explanation, IMO, is that at least some chunk of the CIA/Black Ops guys have gone far enough off the leash (just like they did in the 70s-80s! See: Church commission) that stirring up trouble is how they fund themselves. (Black Ops are notorious for (A) having trouble getting official funding, and (B) resorting to funding methods that are innately problematic.)
Great explanation, and finally I see somebody who truly gets the ISIL tag that Obama was using and why it is a concern.
You can really see the petulant man-child if you line up a slew of videos of him on this. I've lost track of the source, but he get's questioned on it really directly once and whining about it around the edges. "It's not just Syria!"
His open, public, well-documented statements on this are really a comprehensive case (IMO) that lead me to "Ok, now I want to know just WTFBBQ was actually going on in Benghazi/Iran deal, etc. ... because it can't possibly be anything good."