5193
Comments (216)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
bananaguard62 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think he was. I watched it and never saw it associated with Sicknick other than the fire extinguisher connection. That was the area he was stationed though and likely close to where he was hit.

1
labiator 1 point ago +1 / -0

He wasn't hit, that's just it. No evidence of blunt force trauma - autopsy report.

0
bananaguard62 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sure. I see that, but I saw a guy that looks just like him with blood running from his left brow so... Don't know what to tell you.

1
labiator 1 point ago +1 / -0

That eye witness reports can be misleading.

0
bananaguard62 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sure, that's real convenient you get to pull that line out whenever you don't want to hear the witness. Is your opinion then to believe zero eye witness accounts or do you just get to pick and choose? I saw blood. Go ahead and choose to ignore me as convincing you, labiator, means nothing to me.