5193
Comments (216)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
bananaguard62 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sure. I see that, but I saw a guy that looks just like him with blood running from his left brow so... Don't know what to tell you.

1
labiator 1 point ago +1 / -0

That eye witness reports can be misleading.

0
bananaguard62 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sure, that's real convenient you get to pull that line out whenever you don't want to hear the witness. Is your opinion then to believe zero eye witness accounts or do you just get to pick and choose? I saw blood. Go ahead and choose to ignore me as convincing you, labiator, means nothing to me.

1
labiator 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't say I ignore you merely that what we think we see is often not what it seems.

1
bananaguard62 1 point ago +1 / -0

Found a picture of exactly what I saw. It's not Sicknick as far as I can tell.

https://media.patriots.win/post/RGAeyVTt.jpeg

0
bananaguard62 0 points ago +1 / -1

I agree. But are you suggesting I am misremembering blood all over someone face? I don't think my brain would insert something that large without Leonardo DiCaprios help. So it either happened or I'm lying, and I'm not lying.

Even if it wasn't Sicknick, that means another officer was hit with something so hard that despite a giant helmet it caused a laceration on his brow large enough to bleed down his face and onto his uniform. If that'd happened and it wasn't Sicknick, we'd have heard about it, right? See how things all lead to one conclusion, but only IF I'm telling the truth.