And they will keep on cheating as long as they can get away with it. Why not? It works! I don't think we can vote ourselves back to a Constitutional Republic when the voting system is corrupt and rigged. That leaves only one option if you refuse yo live under Tyranny.
One of the excuses scotus used to cuck out hearing fraud cases before was people might get mad and act bad. What would this nutless group think booting Xiden would do to the excitables?
Yes. Possible but unlikely, as we don’t operate in a system that supports the citizen. The Court has never really wanted to set precedent for this to work, for obvious reason.
Quo Warranto
A writ of quo warranto is not a petition, but a notice of demand, issued by a demandant, to a respondant claiming some delegated power, and filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, to hold a hearing within 3 to 20 days, depending on the distance of the respondant to the court, to present proof of his authority to execute his claimed powers. If the court finds the proof insufficient, or if the court fails to hold the hearing, the respondant must cease to exercise the power. If the power is to hold an office, he must vacate the office.
No, most of them subscribe to a constitutional philosophy that once a bad decision has been made, it stays set even if they would have never ruled that way if they heard the case today, for example, Row vs Wade.
This is why, I personally prefer natural law judges over both constitutional judges, and "living constitution" judges.
Under natural law philosophy, your inalienable rights are well defined and exist above government and the constitution, and the government, law, and constitution maintain its legitimacy to the extent it is able to uphold and secure these natural law rights.
My theory is: if the Supreme Court declared that the 2020 election was rigged thus removing Biden and Harris, it would trickle down to the next legal possibility which I believe is the speaker of the house.
The only way Joe Biden gets removed from office is impeachment. If there is undeniable proof of voter fraud, it would still take impeachment to remove him...then Kamala. 100% chance it will never happen. We got scammed.
I can't imagine that remedy being employed. Therefore, I can't imagine the verdict would go that way.
what makes you think they are going to do anything now..... when they wouldnt do shit in november/december?
Not a chance
No.
Supreme Court could argue it's unprecedented and the Inauguration is final
No, jan 20 was the final date
legally speaking he will still be president even if it's 100% proven there was massive fraud and he got nowhere near Trump's votes
And they will keep on cheating as long as they can get away with it. Why not? It works! I don't think we can vote ourselves back to a Constitutional Republic when the voting system is corrupt and rigged. That leaves only one option if you refuse yo live under Tyranny.
No.
Under the electors clause of the Constitution, the state legislatures have plenary power to appoint electors. They did so, fraud and all.
These electors voted for Biden.
I know they just replaced a Dem representative with a Rep representative in NY after the State Supreme Court found voter fraud.
Electors clause doesn’t apply to those elections.
Fraud vidiates everything.
This.
One of the excuses scotus used to cuck out hearing fraud cases before was people might get mad and act bad. What would this nutless group think booting Xiden would do to the excitables?
Hope so!
Yes. Possible but unlikely, as we don’t operate in a system that supports the citizen. The Court has never really wanted to set precedent for this to work, for obvious reason.
Quo Warranto
A writ of quo warranto is not a petition, but a notice of demand, issued by a demandant, to a respondant claiming some delegated power, and filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, to hold a hearing within 3 to 20 days, depending on the distance of the respondant to the court, to present proof of his authority to execute his claimed powers. If the court finds the proof insufficient, or if the court fails to hold the hearing, the respondant must cease to exercise the power. If the power is to hold an office, he must vacate the office.
https://constitution.org/1-Activism/writ/quo_warranto.htm
No, most of them subscribe to a constitutional philosophy that once a bad decision has been made, it stays set even if they would have never ruled that way if they heard the case today, for example, Row vs Wade.
This is why, I personally prefer natural law judges over both constitutional judges, and "living constitution" judges.
Under natural law philosophy, your inalienable rights are well defined and exist above government and the constitution, and the government, law, and constitution maintain its legitimacy to the extent it is able to uphold and secure these natural law rights.
My theory is: if the Supreme Court declared that the 2020 election was rigged thus removing Biden and Harris, it would trickle down to the next legal possibility which I believe is the speaker of the house.
It is a fact that if the election was falsified and there is fraud being proven that they have to remove the fraudulent winner!
The only way Joe Biden gets removed from office is impeachment. If there is undeniable proof of voter fraud, it would still take impeachment to remove him...then Kamala. 100% chance it will never happen. We got scammed.