I swear we’ve been in the midst of a biological war since covid has been unleashed. Big pharma is corrupt as well... Attacking us through a vaccine (something the majority of people have trusted for years) since the actual virus wasn’t deadly enough.
They say that the mRNA should leave the body once it's no longer needed. Since all it does is grow proteins on the cell wall then it is "no longer needed" almost instantly I assume. Therefore if I get exposed to covid a month later is this ineffective? If so it's bogus. If not, then it doesn't do what they claim and it will become permanently part of my DNA. Either way, no thanks.
I am not advocating for it but I wanted to explain how they say it works.
The proteins the mRNA builds are supposed to alert your body to a future potential threat allowing your body to identify the real virus right away. This denies the virus time to multiply while your immune system adapts to attack it.
.
Right but how does this work 3 months down the road? Are you still immune when the RNA has left the body like they claim it does? Do those proteins remain permanently or is this really no long term fix?
That is a function of your immune system recognizing a possible pathogen. One polio vaccine (a dead virus) gives a person lifelong immunity. I see no reason this approach should be any less effective at enabling the body to recognize proteins of this virus. The difference being the full virus had hundreds of surface proteins that the body might learn to recognize. This vaccine introduces several proteins. Flu vaccines need to be repeated because there are hundreds of different flu viruses when preparing the vaccine they focus on a few they think will be predominant. Each year it vaccinates against different flus. So far none of the COVID variants has been reported to not have all if not most of the proteins in the vaccine.
I swear we’ve been in the midst of a biological war since covid has been unleashed. Big pharma is corrupt as well... Attacking us through a vaccine (something the majority of people have trusted for years) since the actual virus wasn’t deadly enough.
The vaccine industry got off the rails awhile ago. I swear since Bill Gates antitrust issues. He’s been meddling in everything else ever since.
They say that the mRNA should leave the body once it's no longer needed. Since all it does is grow proteins on the cell wall then it is "no longer needed" almost instantly I assume. Therefore if I get exposed to covid a month later is this ineffective? If so it's bogus. If not, then it doesn't do what they claim and it will become permanently part of my DNA. Either way, no thanks.
I am not advocating for it but I wanted to explain how they say it works. The proteins the mRNA builds are supposed to alert your body to a future potential threat allowing your body to identify the real virus right away. This denies the virus time to multiply while your immune system adapts to attack it. .
Right but how does this work 3 months down the road? Are you still immune when the RNA has left the body like they claim it does? Do those proteins remain permanently or is this really no long term fix?
That is a function of your immune system recognizing a possible pathogen. One polio vaccine (a dead virus) gives a person lifelong immunity. I see no reason this approach should be any less effective at enabling the body to recognize proteins of this virus. The difference being the full virus had hundreds of surface proteins that the body might learn to recognize. This vaccine introduces several proteins. Flu vaccines need to be repeated because there are hundreds of different flu viruses when preparing the vaccine they focus on a few they think will be predominant. Each year it vaccinates against different flus. So far none of the COVID variants has been reported to not have all if not most of the proteins in the vaccine.