The midwest is being hammered by extreme cold once again thanks to arctic displacement caused by deranged air currents; collectively called "the polar vortex" There are reports that in Texas they had to shut off the windmills because they were icing over. So basically, windmills are a fair-weather energy producer. Same with solar panels. Not only do they underperform in the cold, they actually get snowed on, and if there is defrost technology, that costs so much energy that it nullifies many of the energy gains.
Everyone knows that the cold causes cars difficulty in starting. This is not because of the combustion, but because of the BATTERIES. Cold batteries struggle to work properly because the cold affects the chemistry of the battery--it slows down chemical reactions and thus it's harder for batteries to deliver sufficient spark to the spark plugs. (they should use high capacity capacitors in addition for the initial crank, imho)
There's going to be a shitton of priuses on the side of the road dead because their batteries just won't work. It's already happening now. With combustion cars, someone can still jump you and you can make it to somewhere warm.
Taken together, GREEN TECHNOLOGY is not cold-compatible---it's at best, wildly problematic in the cold, and at worst a total failure in the cold.
And yet, entire industries are tripping over themselves in order to changeover to electric. I personally really like electric, or getting away from fossil fuels in vehicles, however, we don't have a sufficient infrastructure technology to mitigate combustibles just yet, other than going all-in on nuclear and somehow storing the energy it produces as hydrogen batteries or some other kind of cold-resistant rechargeable battery.
The problem is: BATTERIES. That's the real problem. Storage.
I believe we're going to go back to mechanical storage. As in flywheels and wind-up clocks (advanced springs). Because chemical is bullshit. It just IS bullshit right now. We need to scramble to anything that's better than Lithium Ion batteries. They are total bullshit. Heavy, inefficent, and wildly overhyped in terms of their recharge numbers--everyone knows this. They develop memory and then they become bullshit.
I am not a shill for fossil fuels or nuclear. I personally have a love hate for nuclear. There is no doubt we have to use nuclear because it can be the cleanest energy there is. It just has to be done with SAFETY FIRST.
They need to be STANDARDIZED across the world
Thorium molten salt reactors are the way to go. They don't melt down, you just just them down and they cool off. They are safer in terms of quakes and problems. They use rare earth nuclear fuel more sparingly. They are less efficient than other fission reactors but again, Safety first. They are still 20,000x+ more productive than damned windmills and solar.
Solar and wind will never provide the needs for infrastructure, esp in the case of extreme cold. Run the numbers yourselves. If you're honest, you'll see the same thing I'm seeing. It's just not there. Nuclear is the future. It has to be done right: Safety. No more meltdowns or ruining the earth for millions of years.
Uhhhh.
What?
Solar doesn't 'underperform' in the cold, idgit. They OVERPERFORM and clip out. The colder they are, the more efficient. That's why solar does so well in places where it's cold and sunny. Like Colorado.
Dude, if you don't understand how voltage works, you should keep it to yourself.
Yep. Batteries work better in the cold as well. It’s the spark plugs that freeze up. I had a Maverick that had top of the line spark plugs. Always started when the rest of my families cars wouldn’t. They all had the same exact brand of batteries.
????? I hope this is a troll, I really do. Lead acid batteries perform their worst when cold. Spark plugs don't "freeze up". They are made of metal and ceramic, nothing really affected by temperature. Don't even get me started on the "I had a Maverick" line....
Lead batteries do just fine in cold weather, but the kind of batteries that hybrids and full electrical cars use aren’t lead. You seem to conflate the two. And yes, some spark plugs are better than others. Especially for winter. How do you not know this? They sell specific ones for winter.
Yes, I owned a Maverick. Most reliable car I ever owned. I’m very old.
Heat range of a spark plug refers to how quickly the end of the plug radiates it's heat back to the engine after cylinder detonation- not how cold it is outside. You may need to change a heat range if your state really changes the mix of your gasoline in the winter time, but that has nothing to do with the plug. Let's see, Maverick. Probably 250 I-6, 2bbl carter carb. The Pinto I owned started pretty easily in the deep freeze of a Michigan winter as well.. But that wasn't due to the spark plugs. (I'm not a spring chicken, either). Lead Acid batteries do NOT perform as well in the winter. According to Industrial Battery Products, a lead acid cell loses approximately 50% of it's ampacity when its temp is lowered to -22 degrees F. At less than 32 degrees F, it's already down 20%.
Sigh, so we agree they make higher performance spark plugs right? That’s what I had in my Maverick. I know there are other things involve, but there are some spark plugs they sell for winter. I’m sure they’re just high performance ones being marketed, but they do make a huge difference.
You were conflating lead batteries and the kind used in electrical cars. They are very different. Also, you’re talking extreme cold to get it to 50, I don’t have time to check on those numbers. But 50 will still turn over just fine.
A Tesla will do just fine in a cold climate. Plenty do. The reason that electrical cars are the future is that you can power them in your garage. That beats gas. End of game. Tesla’s don’t have lead batteries. Or spark plugs. Maintenance is maybe a tenth of my other car.
It’s superior. Electrical is just better.
Loved my Maverick. A deer took it out while my dad was driving it. I always loved V8s. Pretty sure my Maverick was, but maybe that was my Scamp. My Comet definitely was and it even had nitro tanks on either side of the engine. Never used them. Muscle cars are my favorite, but I just care about what’s the least amount of time at this point.
Sorry Drumpfs fault the wall he didnt build is causing it REEEEEEEEEEE. 😭😭😭😭
They will ignore it and claim it just means we need more.
Then they will blame climate change, and ignore the real cause: the hole in the ozone layer (which China keeps making worse)
you can't teach liberals.
The problem right now is storage. The wind and sun shines when you don't need the energy. That can be used to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen can be stored and transported, but instead of in a motor you burn it cold in a fuel cell and create electricity. Fuel cells can also be run with natural gas. In 2006 I saw the cars operating on that technology. Problem is the infrastructure. Normal fuel and the new systems will need to be run parallel for some time. This requires huge investments in a short time. The key for conservative success will be to be as self sufficient as possible within a region. Governments become targets for blackmail if they cannot be self-sufficient. People in rural areas have to learn to build and finance their own infrastructure again without constantly relyibg on government grants. That will allow us to shrink the government the size required.
The "energy turn-around" in Germany is a huge failure. Without coal they would have blackouts everywhere. A politician with a masters in physics runs this government and ignores the basics of physics....
All the left hears is blah blah blah blah blah - full steam ahead on everything electric! Save the planet.
These f*#@£×* are not reasonable and their fragile egos do them no good.
It's like their old argument "well, real communism hasn't been tried yet"
>Teaching Moment for The Left
Yeah, they'll learn this time for sure.
Possible alternatives to current "green" tech:
What if windmills were re-designed to have the turbine on the vertical axis, instead of the horizontal axis?
What if vehicles broke down water to produce hydrogen?