Plaintiff Lawyer: "Your Honor, we are suing Smith and Wesson because their .40 caliber handgun killed my client"
Defence Attorney: "Your Honor, we have examined the gun in question and found that it is in perfect order. With each pull the trigger it functioned perfectly with no malfunctions and expelled one round each time. It performed exactly as it was designed to."
The only time you should be able to sue a gun company for one of their products killing you is when the gun blows up in your hand. And even then you should have to rule out user error
Move to Canada
Play with Iphone in the middle of busy intersection
Get hit by car
Sue Apple, sue Uber, sue Toyota
Profit
Better yet, join a terrorist group, get caught and sent to Gitmo, then Trudeau will give you $10,000,000.
Sometimes I wonder if Canadians are ever embarrassed.
Yes we are
According to our Constitution the list of authorized gun users is . . . literally everyone.
Not in Canada
That sounds like a "them" problem.
It's a natural right. If they deny it, then they are wrong.
Good luck with that.
It's not up to the firearm to be responsible. It's the user.
BUT IT WASN'T DNA LINKED TO THE OWNER SO THAT OTHERS CANT USE IT REEEEEEEEEE!
Plaintiff Lawyer: "Your Honor, we are suing Smith and Wesson because their .40 caliber handgun killed my client"
Defence Attorney: "Your Honor, we have examined the gun in question and found that it is in perfect order. With each pull the trigger it functioned perfectly with no malfunctions and expelled one round each time. It performed exactly as it was designed to."
Judge: "Case dismissed."
The Toronto Sun is based BTW.
The only time you should be able to sue a gun company for one of their products killing you is when the gun blows up in your hand. And even then you should have to rule out user error