Research is bought and paid for ahead of time, so the scientists have to produce the results they want. They alter historical data and ignore solar data and limit it only to showing that human increase in CO2 is to blame. Researchers who tell the truth get blacklisted so they receive no funding and get fired from universities.
Science has been politicized for some time. Ever since the first research university took a federal grant. Been downhill ever since. If only people knew what went on with "peer review" in the real world......... Make you sick.
can you point us in the direction of an article, interview, etc.?
Does peer-reviewed = peers criticize what scientists discovered that doesn't comply w/agenda?
Research is bought and paid for ahead of time, so the scientists have to produce the results they want. They alter historical data and ignore solar data and limit it only to showing that human increase in CO2 is to blame. Researchers who tell the truth get blacklisted so they receive no funding and get fired from universities.
Science has been politicized for some time. Ever since the first research university took a federal grant. Been downhill ever since. If only people knew what went on with "peer review" in the real world......... Make you sick.
can you point us in the direction of an article, interview, etc.? Does peer-reviewed = peers criticize what scientists discovered that doesn't comply w/agenda?