It’s called Lysinkoism. Maybe they don’t get thrown in the gulag like they would in the USSR, but they’re still locked out which is effectively the same thing.
It’s blatantly obvious that something is wrong because people are told this is the “world’s #1 problem” yet when economists do cost benefit analysis on all the world problems, even just assuming the questionable climate science is good, they find 1) it’s not the number one problem, others are bigger and 2) the proposed solution is the worst possible solution https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/copenhagen-consensus-climate/results
So it’s already very obvious that the climate agreement stuff must not be about solving the claimed problem, it must be to do what it actually does which is manipulate the petroleum market and retard economic development in developing countries.
The developing countries should just agree to the fake agreement and take the money, then just completely ignore the agreement and engage in full-on developmental economics full speed ahead. Only problem is they’ll probably have to spend more money to buy coal with the globalists trying to shut down coal mining, unless they have domestic coal mines. And if any globalists bitch at them about it then show them the middle finger.
It’s called Lysinkoism. Maybe they don’t get thrown in the gulag like they would in the USSR, but they’re still locked out which is effectively the same thing.
It’s blatantly obvious that something is wrong because people are told this is the “world’s #1 problem” yet when economists do cost benefit analysis on all the world problems, even just assuming the questionable climate science is good, they find 1) it’s not the number one problem, others are bigger and 2) the proposed solution is the worst possible solution https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/copenhagen-consensus-climate/results
So it’s already very obvious that the climate agreement stuff must not be about solving the claimed problem, it must be to do what it actually does which is manipulate the petroleum market and retard economic development in developing countries.
The developing countries should just agree to the fake agreement and take the money, then just completely ignore the agreement and engage in full-on developmental economics full speed ahead. Only problem is they’ll probably have to spend more money to buy coal with the globalists trying to shut down coal mining, unless they have domestic coal mines. And if any globalists bitch at them about it then show them the middle finger.