Are you talking about the Libertarian Rainwater? He got about 11 percent of the vote. Holcomb got 56+ percent and the Democrat got 32%. No independent candidate got any more than 11% of the vote and none will in the near future. Like so many have said before, wiping out Holcomb with another person running under the Republican banner is the smart choice rather than trying to third party him in a state as resistant to change as Indiana. Thank God the idea of getting a Democrat governor motivated so many people to come out and vote for Holcomb since a Libertarian was there, as usual, to siphon votes from a weak conservative candidate without a bat's chance in hell of winning. Thankfully, this time a Libertarian didn't cause Indiana to get a Democrat in the governorship.
Yea I derped. I looked up the numbers after I posted. I must've remembered their percentages early into the "election month" as it was this time around. LOL. Definitely can't call it election day. My apologies. But the independent did have a significant vote for a third party this day in age. I agree that splitting the vote three ways could cost us the spot. But I figured in such a conservative state, a demo would never win. I shot my shit at the independent because I liked what he stood for.
With all the cheating and considering Indianapolis is run by Leftists, a Democrat could win the governorship if the Republican doesn't have very strong turnout.
Everyone was talking about the suburb north of Marion county (indianapolis) hamilton county and how it almost "went" blue. Turns out they had a voter turnout out of 103%. LOL
Especially coming in at 350k votes. When the dems only got 850k votes. Made an easy win for hole-cum at 1.7M votes. I see no harm with my vote. I went for IMHO the best candidate and my second choice easily won so it's not all bad. But hole-cum is a rino and needs to go. As do most of these politicians in 2022
Are you talking about the Libertarian Rainwater? He got about 11 percent of the vote. Holcomb got 56+ percent and the Democrat got 32%. No independent candidate got any more than 11% of the vote and none will in the near future. Like so many have said before, wiping out Holcomb with another person running under the Republican banner is the smart choice rather than trying to third party him in a state as resistant to change as Indiana. Thank God the idea of getting a Democrat governor motivated so many people to come out and vote for Holcomb since a Libertarian was there, as usual, to siphon votes from a weak conservative candidate without a bat's chance in hell of winning. Thankfully, this time a Libertarian didn't cause Indiana to get a Democrat in the governorship.
Yea I derped. I looked up the numbers after I posted. I must've remembered their percentages early into the "election month" as it was this time around. LOL. Definitely can't call it election day. My apologies. But the independent did have a significant vote for a third party this day in age. I agree that splitting the vote three ways could cost us the spot. But I figured in such a conservative state, a demo would never win. I shot my shit at the independent because I liked what he stood for.
With all the cheating and considering Indianapolis is run by Leftists, a Democrat could win the governorship if the Republican doesn't have very strong turnout.
Everyone was talking about the suburb north of Marion county (indianapolis) hamilton county and how it almost "went" blue. Turns out they had a voter turnout out of 103%. LOL
Especially coming in at 350k votes. When the dems only got 850k votes. Made an easy win for hole-cum at 1.7M votes. I see no harm with my vote. I went for IMHO the best candidate and my second choice easily won so it's not all bad. But hole-cum is a rino and needs to go. As do most of these politicians in 2022