2592
Comments (228)
sorted by:
309
Monsieur_Novembre 309 points ago +309 / -0

How come Mr. Gaige was not arrested for illegal possession of a firearm (he's a felon) and attempted murder (he clearly stated to his friend the following day that he regretted not being able to "empty his clip" in Kyle?

74
Jackhererer 74 points ago +75 / -1

I heard that mr. Gaige had his gun rights restored. Was not confirmed 1 way or the other.

65
Hshsvsvsvsv 65 points ago +68 / -3

We need people to go after them. We need to control the legal syste

51
JackIsALarp 51 points ago +53 / -2

I said we needed more legal pedes back in 2016. I was downvoted (back on TDr) for suggesting any of us become lowly legal types. I also warned about the dipshit we can't name from the former site name.

People need to think about the future more. The patterns are known and established. Just open your eyes, folks.

45
iorek 45 points ago +45 / -0

Legalpede here; and while this sentiment is good - the entire law community is wholly overrun with leftist zealots. My first day of skoolin they forced us to read and "discuss" "Between the world and me" by Ta-Nahisi Coats. Of course the discussion was only of approved anti-white ideology, and it was strictly verboten to point out the vile hate that blowhard spewed into those pages. The remainder of skoolin wasn't any better, and it's a shark tank of sjw zealots who will ensure you're ostracized both in school, and in the legal networks that might hire you afterwards. Taking back systems is important, but the entire law community, both judges and lawyers, may be too corrupt and indoctrinated to turn back.

Spez'd: “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” ― Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome

37
OhNoes 37 points ago +37 / -0

Hang them all, gotcha.

Im ok with that.

24
Modernturnkey 24 points ago +24 / -0

Exactly. The fucking constitution isn't open for interpretation.

8
iorek 8 points ago +8 / -0

“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” ― Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome

4
glow-operator-2-0 4 points ago +4 / -0

salus populi suprema lex

The Reno brothers

👍

9
Jimmyprawns 9 points ago +10 / -1

Too corrupt and indoctrinated is no excuse for not trying. We don't fight like the French. It's not enough to make a show fight and promptly surrender. We have to keep up the pressure. And pile on every little victory we can get.

The left was up against it when they started thier ' long march' through the institutions. It was slow at first and fast in the end. It's only fair that our march starts off not so easy as well.

2
Codreanu 2 points ago +2 / -0

"We don't fight like the French. It's not enough to make a show fight and promptly surrender."

LMAO that's rich. Care to remind me what happened last election ?

1
Jimmyprawns 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then go sit in a corner and cry about it.

2
Final_Arbiter 2 points ago +2 / -0

IMO, Kyle should prepare and go on the RUN, ASAP...he gonna get his ass railroaded with this SJW system and end up with a lifetime of jogger prison rape. That boy needs to lose/gain weight have plastic surgery and fucking run to the ends of the earth if need be. No way that boy is getting a fair fucking trial.

2
Illah88zillah 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice commentary fren 👍

10
TownesVanCamp 10 points ago +13 / -3

Morons. The law is written to be confusing so that us morons cannot ever interpret it. Anyone who would suggest that we skip our understanding of legalese is a simple person. Understanding and application of the law does not indicate ones level of morality. This is a fickle crew prone to it's own type of virtue signaling at times.

7
randomusers239874 7 points ago +8 / -1

Ehh sorry I have to disagree. The problem is that law is (supposed to be) an application of logic, which requires very precise language. The average person doesn't have the logical ability necessary to read such things, regardless of how it's written, because there is no way way to write it such that it is both precise and easy to understand. Personally, I think written language is actually insufficient for law, and should probably be written in pure mathematical logic. Then you wouldn't have people arguing about what "well regulated" means and such.

7
CuomoisaMassMurderer 7 points ago +7 / -0

Disagree about "average person" and logic. It just ain't that damned hard. The problem is school became designed to make people not think.

7
disgruntled_patriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

Precisely. The average sane, level headed person intuitively knows the meaning of words as intended.

It's only insane, unhinged, agenda driven zealots who make mental gymnastics out of the perfectly understandable. Because their minds aren't grounded in reality, they have to twist reality to fit their warped misunderstanding of it.

Now, law should be written precisely so that manipulative hacks can't make pleas on technicalities, or just so that there aren't reasonable disagreements stemming from imprecise language.

But the law is undoubtedly written to be confusing. It's not the legalese per se, it's the sheer massive network of laws on the books, many of which are purposefully vague so as the leave them open to interpretation and specifically designed to contradict each other. All so lawyers can wage legal warfare upon law abiding citizens and let their pet crooks off scott free.

It's not the language that requires simplification. The books just need to be revised. i.e.: heavily truncated.

3
randomusers239874 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry man, really disagree. "Logic" as understood by lay people is not what I'm talking about, and in fact, is usually not logical at all. It's the same with "common sense", there is no such thing, it's just something people made up to justify their opinion. Logic and mathematics are equivalent to each other, and you need to have a mathematically inclined brain to really grasp it. And I don't mean the ability to do algebra or compute, I mean the ability to write mathematical proofs and such. That ability is somewhat rare amongst the general population. Laws (should be) written and analyzed in the same way mathematical proofs are, which is why the language needs to be complex; simple language has too many holes that can be argued about.

1
TownesVanCamp 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are intelligent enough to know that we are both correct.

1
randomusers239874 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry man, but no, I can't agree with you. I have an example actually, the constitution. The constitution is written in somewhat plain language, which is why it has been so easy to poke holes in. For example, the second amendment. This is going to chap your ass, and most people that read this, but without the historical context, the second amendment does not outline a personal right to bear arms unambiguously. Now, reading it in that way is completely reasonable, even more so with the historical context, but the unfortunate truth is that laws need to "stand on their own legs", and generally do not have the luxury of being interpreted within a context. That's why the argument that is doesn't outline a personal right to bare arms holds legal weight. Both are valid arguments because the language is not unambiguous, despite what people like to think. This is why legalese is so important, it makes situations like that less probable.

4
Throwingway22 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're both right and wrong. It's not that there aren't enough MAGA lawyers (definitely not enough), it's that one commie AG in a blue city can coopt the legal system and force cases like these to be seen in front of only leftists juries. That goes all the way up to the federal gov't and is why all political cases are only ever brought in SDNY or the DC Circuit. It's a rotten system.

Some progress non-legalpedes can do; in Red states, start petitioning the state legislatures to better restrict jurisdictions and start sending more court cases out of the State Capital where all the partisan hack judges and AGs live.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Trump2AM 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, but we should expect it to work.

0
The_Patriot2021 0 points ago +1 / -1

We are emcee going to control the legal system.

We need to realize who controls the legal system, and call them out on it. They always use litigation as a weapon.

40
Dirk_Diggler 40 points ago +40 / -0

It's even more benign than that from what I remember before information was getting rearranged and scrubbed. It appears he was charged with a felony but not convicted (from what I recall.). Being charged alone won't pull your rights, it's the conviction that is necessary. That being said, he fully intended on using that gun on Rittenhouse, being deceptive on his intial approach, but came in second place when Kyle seen the gun later aimed at him. That fuck stick was an aggressor and needs to have been charged. I hope Kyle walks and sues the fuck out of that "medic."

14
BlackCoyote 14 points ago +14 / -0

There are some pretty well known firearms/personal defense instructors who have weighed in on Kyle's actions in Kenosha. Aside from debates about whether or not Kyle should have been there at all, the only criticism anyone seems to have about how he handled himself is that he didn't put a second round into an attacker who was still standing and holding a gun pointed at him.

1
Wrathofwretchcmox 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess good thing he has to learn how to shoot lefty now?

3
CuomoisaMassMurderer 3 points ago +3 / -0

No way were they restored before the incident though. His possession at the time was illegal af.

Can't believe slot machine was in on this hearing

3
bdailey1965USA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I tried to get mine back..very very hard to do....he must've told them what he would do with those restored rights

20
blackkit27 20 points ago +20 / -0

Joshua Ziminski who was using the Alias of Alex Blaine that night and fired the first shot at Kyle also needs to be attempted on about a dozen felonies including Having Weapons under Disability, Attempted Murder, Inciting Violence, Inciting A Riot etc.

2
Mooksayshigh 2 points ago +2 / -0

They were pressing charges against him last I heard

11
unclebobinator 11 points ago +13 / -2

My guess? The video alone isn't proof it was an actual gun. Unless they were able to recover the gun, and maintain the chain of custody regarding handling evidence, it would seem like a large mountain to climb for a prosecutor to get a conviction. High chance he passed that gun off to a comrade before going to the hospital. With only the video and photos as evidence I don't see a really strong case unfortunately.

27
Basard 27 points ago +28 / -1

There were some pretty detailed photos as well.

11
unclebobinator 11 points ago +13 / -2

And the defense could argue there are pretty detailed replicas out there as well. Which there are. You really expect them to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt based off this evidence alone? Even I wouldn't convict him if that charge based on only that evidence. And I'm one of the people that are disappointed that Kyle misses and merely hit him in the arm. From what we know, the evidence just isn't there that would lead to a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.

27
ontothefuture 27 points ago +28 / -1

If you point a 'replica' at someone with a loaded rifle you are a special kind of stupid.

25
Husky 25 points ago +25 / -0

If you point a replica at someone it's legally no different than pointing a real gun at them.

3
FetchQuestTroll 3 points ago +3 / -0

this is the crux of it -- did Kyle Rittenhouse reasonably believe his life was in immediate danger?

-4
unclebobinator -4 points ago +2 / -6

No shit. But in terms of the law they obviously can't prove it was an actual gun.

No proof of an actual gun means it likely being an acquital, if he even gets charged. Which he hasn't.

5
Finnsforgeotus 5 points ago +5 / -0

lol thats why he should have killed him, the law is much friendlier on fake guns and dead men.

4
unclebobinator 4 points ago +5 / -1

That's what my NRA instructor told me. Said if you have to shoot, once you do ya don't stop until the magazine is empty. Even if you're sure he was dead after the first shot, and you were 200% in the right to use deadly force. Empty it.

Because witnesses can throw a giant spanner into your self-defense argument, even when true why take the chance? Not like the attacker was giving you any chances to begin with.

4
PieceOfParchment7 4 points ago +5 / -1

Brandishing a replica is illegal too.

0
OhNoes 0 points ago +2 / -2

He was involved while others died.

Charge him with two murders

4
CuomoisaMassMurderer 4 points ago +5 / -1

Slot machine said he wished he emptied his weapon into Kyle. This removes all doubt. You also see slot machine taking it out of his waistband over the course of a long haul. You wouldn't do that with a replica.

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
3
BaldyGull 3 points ago +4 / -1

Even if you can't prove it was a gun, the fact that it looked like one is enough to make it brandishing or menacing depending on local law.

1
unclebobinator 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's not the question though. That's a separate argument not based on the one I was having with the original poster.

Yes he could have been arrested for assault with a deadly weapon.

But conviction as a result of unlawfully carrying of a firearm? Highly unlikely.

2
Brucesky420 2 points ago +3 / -1

What about the couple who had their guns out on their own property? Why were they charged?

3
Mooksayshigh 3 points ago +3 / -0

They weren’t. Charges were dropped.

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because he isn't a felon.

He was charged but there was no conviction. Could be released, could have been a plea deal.

1
Mooksayshigh 1 point ago +1 / -0

These people get their info from memes. Just like FB, I’m surprised to see the truth about this, thank you. He is not, and was not a felon, He has a CCL. Not saying he’s a good person, I wish Kyle blasted him too, but he was totally legal to carry that pistol.

2
MAGAdadUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

My question as well.

119
kompromatdotwin 119 points ago +119 / -0

hah! i forgot all about this!

so, i recorded and reported this to the court clerks that evening.. i meant to post it here in hopes of others also reaching out, but totally forgot about it until i saw your screencap!

here's what i sent: https://i.maga.host/ZMyR7Iz.png

edit: added video for op: https://youtu.be/gUAfzzTccz4?t=2810 dickhead's father (also a dickhead) is just raaaaging at the judge behind his mask (which btw he only put on because kyle was wearing his see 4:20 where he puts it on, and 23:20 where he cries about having to take it off "why doesn't he have to wahh")

48
RegularAmerican 48 points ago +48 / -0

What a faggot who cries about having to go maskless?

33
TonsOfSalt 33 points ago +33 / -0

The real MVP

14
Hshsvsvsvsv 14 points ago +15 / -1

Do the same

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
9
bit0101 9 points ago +9 / -0

What does that note say he holds up at 51:08?

8
Bearing51 8 points ago +8 / -0

Want it to be taken seriously? Don't write in a [email protected] address and use a real e-mail instead. Any e-mail coming in as obviously fake won't even make it past our spam system.

98
MAGAlorian 98 points ago +98 / -0

Skate and die.

2nd edit: This is what I'm talking about (streamable will pull it down soon, I'll put it somewhere else later): https://streamable.com/fccdou

He grabs the gun and pulls it towards himself.

edit: Also, I'd like to add that "Skater Boi" essentially shot himself, I watched that footage in slow-mo. The skater hits Kyle with his skateboard and then grabs the barrel of the rifle and PULLS it towards his own chest. Anyone with a cursory concept of physics could ascertain that pulling a gun while someone has their finger on the trigger of the gun and is trying to keep you from taking their gun is very likely to cause the gun to discharge if you PULL it towards yourself. In fact, when I get some time... I'll make a slow-mo, annotated video of these events.

39
Monsieur_Novembre 39 points ago +39 / -0

make sure to send it to mr richards the attorney before the trial

34
Aoikaze2000 34 points ago +34 / -0

.... does he win a Darwin Award for this?

12
DZP1 12 points ago +12 / -0

To ensure quality we will be making Darwin Awards out of small lead cylinders.

4
H1ddenAg3nda 4 points ago +4 / -0

If I remember correctly he had a daughter so no. Darwin award requires taking yourself out of the gene pool before breeding.

1
Wearyman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's hope she takes after her mother. Still disappointing he didn't make the award. Oh well. At least he will carry his Lead and Copper trophy forever.

1
PieceOfParchment7 1 point ago +1 / -0

That award goes to the dumbass who pulled the statue on top of themselves.

14
FreeFire 14 points ago +14 / -0

It is a means of removing oneself from the gene pool.

10
TonsOfSalt 10 points ago +10 / -0

You could make an inanimate object pull the trigger like that lol

4
BeijingJoeHastoGo 4 points ago +4 / -0

The vids are all gone, unless you already downloaded them.

2
MAGAlorian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did.

This is what I'm talking about (streamable will pull it down soon, I'll put it somewhere else later): https://streamable.com/fccdou

He grabs the gun and pulls it towards himself.

1
BeijingJoeHastoGo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rare!

74
orcwordlaugh 74 points ago +75 / -1

Is that idiot wearing a mask while alone at home on teleconference?

41
coldredpill 41 points ago +42 / -1

Not sure if it's because he's an idiot or a douchebag/criminal who likes to hide his face from the world.

17
Whimpy13 17 points ago +17 / -0

Por qué no los dos?

5
Independenceforever 5 points ago +5 / -0

Porque necesito bebir tequila

2
Malthus 2 points ago +3 / -1

Hmm, one could also assume some degree of intelligence and him just trying to prevent the audience to see him smile inaproprietly if something negative for Kyle would happen. But this is assuming a lot for this kind of people...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Ithrowawaay 0 points ago +2 / -2

C) all of the above.

2
MrBabySpam 2 points ago +2 / -0

smh smh dumb fucking idiot!

1
bjjmike69 1 point ago +3 / -2

Honestly, it’s probably more of a respect the court thing. Judges care about the little things — wearing clean cut clothes, having family members present, and in current times wearing a mask. You can tell the dudes father do not really respect the court they’re in because they’re the only ones without a suit (or shirt and tie at least).

47
TonsOfSalt 47 points ago +49 / -2

I have no idea what your title is trying to say.

53
Trustnone 53 points ago +53 / -0

The father is flipping the bird to the judge.

17
TonsOfSalt 17 points ago +20 / -3

Father of who?

60
Olds77 60 points ago +60 / -0

The violent convict that attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard.

28
Monsieur_Novembre 28 points ago +28 / -0

Woman-beater it is then

47
Olds77 47 points ago +47 / -0

With such a classy, responsible dad it's no wonder he raised a violent woman beater that chased down and tried to bash a minor with a skate board.

14
Infuriator 14 points ago +14 / -0

It’s ok, in the end it worked out fine. Lol

7
Sexual-Assault-Rifle 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hasn't worked out fine for Kyle....yet.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
8
Monsieur_Novembre 8 points ago +8 / -0

Either the woman-beater or the pedo "victims"

3
Ninki333 3 points ago +3 / -0

Would that not put him in contempt of the court?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Iliterallylovejv 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like state troopers should arrest the father on contempt of court.

2
TexasJack 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's damn lucky the judge didn't see it.

12
Testosteroneape2000 12 points ago +12 / -0

Me either. It makes no sense. I gave up trying to decipher it.

4
RuleoVicus 4 points ago +6 / -2

There's is no pause between p.o.s. & Rittenhouse. Read it as one long sentence.

-12
BeijingJoeHastoGo -12 points ago +1 / -13

You mad bro? What the felon faggot pedo your butt buddy?

2
muricabanana 2 points ago +2 / -0

Re-read dumbass

1
GME_Millionaire 1 point ago +1 / -0

made?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Testosteroneape2000 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks

1
frothy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you, I reread the title about 10 times thinking I was losing my mind. Glad I'm not the only one that didn't understand a single word of it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
38
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 38 points ago +38 / -0

I wonder if Kyle is going to be the spark. There is a LOT of bullshit from the Left regarding him and we will most likely see riots start when he gets off..

I also suspect shit going down if he doesn't get released.

Time will tell, but this is one we all should be watching closely. Thanks for posting this OP.

39
TonsOfSalt 39 points ago +39 / -0

They are already setting it up for riots. The Black Information Network makes it sound like Rittenhouse killed 2 black BLM protesters. They don't mention they were white and attacking him.

18
OperationCatSpeed 18 points ago +18 / -0

I believe one of them was a pedo as well right?

27
Saxonlady 27 points ago +27 / -0

Yep. Rosenbaum. Five victims aged 9 - 11 years old. Burn marks, sexual molestation, masturbation and oral sex etc. etc.

I couldn't read beyond that.

7
D0NNIE_DARK0 7 points ago +7 / -0

Good riddance.

6
TexasJack 6 points ago +6 / -0

Anal sex also. I have no idea how he got away with so little time in jail. Charges like that involving children that young is normally 30-40 years.

2
randomusers239874 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's a member of a very tight knit tribe.

2
GME_Millionaire 2 points ago +2 / -0

Disgusting

22
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 22 points ago +23 / -1

The shaved head manlet, and Kyle didn't kill him. Someone else did. That of course isn't talked about. The second was a woman beater. The 3rd he should of gone for center mass instead of hitting his bicep. That faggot was a felon with a handgun that admitted to wanting to dump his mag on Kyle via text to his friend.

11
bit0101 11 points ago +12 / -1

From what I could tell, he actually slapped the barrel of the rifle away as he tried to aim his pistol at Kyle's head. Kyle fired and just happened to hit him in the arm.

5
TearsMakeTheBestAmmo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Missed opportunity.

Pun intended.

1
bit0101 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indeed, especially since the guy was pretending to be medical personnel and fake surrendered before attacking, which is literally a war crime.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
10
SheilaJacksonRee 10 points ago +13 / -3

I have to chime in here about this because it is driving me insane that this is repeated over and over. Not your fault!

In the video, Rittenhouse says "I just shot someone. I had to". He never said "I just killed someone," in the video. The fake news media keeps repeating the "I just killed someone" lie, and now it's taken on a life of its own, unfortunately. I know this because I've watched the video many times while doing research for a law journal. :/

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +2 / -1

A Kenosha detective discovered that the fatal round entered Rosenbaum from behind, and at a downward angle.

There is no possible way Kyle did that.

There were snipers on the roof. They have not been identified.

The owner of the establishment, Kyle's boss, was wrong to put anyone in the way of sniper fire. That's the great tragedy of all this.

5
deleted 5 points ago +13 / -8
8
D0NNIE_DARK0 8 points ago +8 / -0

glowie promotes genocide

1
EggPlanter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is there no way to do a FOIA and determine the scope of which they’re allowed to shit post and incite?

Is there no way to break the veil of immunity and protection to informants and assets and prove an overwhelming where the government provides some transparency and describes their need to be doing renegade shit like this?

2
Ninki333 2 points ago +2 / -0

Black Information Network - B.I.N for short. Named after a garbage can.

1
stratocaster_patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Black Information Network

Sounds like a real intelligent outfit complete with slang and bad grammar I bet. I thought information was just information. You're telling me information is racist now too lol.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
TonsOfSalt 3 points ago +3 / -0

I shit you not, their advice for filling out a job application was to use correct spelling and grammar. Sooo fucking racist.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-3
Wiggleworm -3 points ago +1 / -4

Nothing will happen if he’s convicted. There will be no revolution. Sell your guns while you still can.

29
BigDaddyBigTrump 29 points ago +29 / -0

Why is this even still a case? The whole thing is on video and it's clearly self-defense. Only a complete idiot would... nevermind, I get it now.

22
Saxonlady 22 points ago +22 / -0

I concur. We here know EXACTLY what happened. We saw in virtually real time.

Let's hope the truth prevails 🙏 🤞

Sadly, highly publicised (by biased media) cases usually go awry due to public pressure.

Kyle will likely go to prison for years until the dust settles, and his conviction will finally be overturned after appeal.

5
EMP2024 5 points ago +5 / -0

Robert Barnes is a bit more optimistic than that, but he doesn't expect the case to go to trial for another 6 months.

1
flashersenpai 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's still a case partly because Wood's foundation took the money and ran with no accounting of what it was used for. And he sucked ass in the prior hearings.

There's a NEW account that is a trust for the family rather than a personal foundation and it's partly run by Barnes who's done a hell of a lot more than Woods has to help people.

25
remember1776 25 points ago +25 / -0

video!!

EDIT: i found it

like scumbag father, like scumbag son

7
OperationCatSpeed 7 points ago +7 / -0

That DA is such a fucking shill

10
remember1776 10 points ago +10 / -0

why the fuck does he want Kyle's address so badly when the judge already said 'it's up to the sheriff'? Is he an ESL student or what?

22
LeftyTearsWillFlow 22 points ago +22 / -0

Of course he's wearing a mask, too lmfao.

These people are such faggots.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
milehighvoter 20 points ago +20 / -0

Is Kyle still MIA? I'm hoping he was able to skip the country before they lock him up forever.

52
Monsieur_Novembre 52 points ago +52 / -0

He's in a safehouse, address known by the judge but no the prosecution, which is why they are throwing a fit

18
OperationCatSpeed 18 points ago +18 / -0

Frens-only Autonomous Zone...

11
remember1776 11 points ago +11 / -0

Frens Autonomous Protest, also known as FAP

19
DeusVultIntensifies 19 points ago +19 / -0

To decipher the headline- the father of the man that Kyle shot in self defense flipped the judge the bird when the judge denied raising bail.

18
JohnnyThomas 18 points ago +18 / -0

Thank you, every news agency, for insisting on spamming the search results with videos of you dipshits talking over the actual footage instead of just letting us watch it uninterrupted.

May your entire superfluous industry crumble to the ground.

17
Apersonofinterest 17 points ago +17 / -0

This shit pisses me off.

Kyle Rittenhouse is a Patriot!

He handled his business.

Some folks FAFO.

Case Closed!

17
FreeFire 17 points ago +17 / -0

The rent-a-mob bunch is all the same low quality.

11
BeijingJoeHastoGo 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nah. Kenosha is not full of BLM faggots. It's far more MAGA country than BLM country. They bused in all the felons to loot, burn and murder. The jury pool will be mostly based.

16
BloodDe 16 points ago +16 / -0

That guy with the finger should get a contempt charge.

16
GeneralBoobs 16 points ago +17 / -1

I still love that video. He was like Oprah with bullets. "AND YOU GET A HOLE IN YOU!"

16
Chad_Dudebroski 16 points ago +16 / -0

Joseph rosenbaum, who raped three boys under the age of 13, should have ended up in the back of a sock long before Kyle put him in the morgue.

8
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 8 points ago +8 / -0

5 boys.

15
dontdrinksoy 15 points ago +15 / -0

Shouldn't that fat yellow fuck be in held in contempt?

8
Titan42 8 points ago +9 / -1

A patriot in this thread reported this to the courthouse. Hopefully something will come of it

6
BeijingJoeHastoGo 6 points ago +6 / -0

The judge isn't looking and probably didn't know. Otherwise he probably would have.

12
Memeoverlord 12 points ago +12 / -0

Statistically the dads a pedo as well

4
Siteless_Vagrant 4 points ago +4 / -0

Probably why he's wearing a mask on a zoom call...

9
NZ_Pede 9 points ago +9 / -0

I still feel no remorse for laughing at that faggot in the middle getting his bicep blown off. MEDIC!!!!!!!!!!!!! lmfao

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
-Lumenatra 8 points ago +8 / -0

Isn't that contempt of court?

7
Julius_Severus 7 points ago +7 / -0

He should have raised his son right

What kind of white man participates in a BLM riot?

4
Litecola2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Commies, who seem to also be pedos at a very high rate

2
OldAndy [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

He probably had very little to do with his son other than fucking him occasionally till he was 13 or so.

7
borscht-nazi 7 points ago +8 / -1

Make them all afraid.

7
TheIntersect 7 points ago +7 / -0

Definitely NOT surprised that he’s wearing a mask on a zoom call. That will be a permanent fixture in the cuck wardrobe for years to come.

5
EMP2024 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'd want to hide my face if my son was that pathetic and if I had just flipped off a judge

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Sporadica 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems the judge wasn't looking at the screen to be fair

5
BlackCoyote 5 points ago +5 / -0

Looks like the apple didn't fall far from the tree.

Contempt of virtual court....?

4
TheFreeSpeechRadical 4 points ago +5 / -1

Very confusing title.

2
Youglowhard 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm with you. No idea what's going on

4
Motownmow 4 points ago +4 / -0

You just KNOW that dude wakes up to msnbc and falls asleep to cnn

4
swab_my_ass_china 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t understand what that said. Am I just tired or was that weird sentence structure.

1
EMP2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's both I think, and I'm not trying to be a smart aleck this time haha.

1
swab_my_ass_china 1 point ago +1 / -0

I read it like five times lol

4
Reborned20 4 points ago +4 / -0

Courts are a Clown Show. We the People would not need them if we knew the Constitution and convened our own Grand Juries.

Every Sheriff can convene a grand jury.

tacticalcivics.com

4
BoughtByBloomberg2 4 points ago +4 / -0

He also held up a piece of paper with something on it but the auto focus was off.

4
NPC11011110000 4 points ago +4 / -0

Wearing mask on a Zoom call. These people are RETARDED.

4
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hmm, the father of a violent felon is also a raging asshole? Who would've guessed?

4
Siteless_Vagrant 4 points ago +4 / -0

Which POS's father is that? The "shoot me nigga" POS, or the "I'm gonna bring a skateboard to a gunfight" POS?

7
GGodHand 7 points ago +7 / -0

Father of the lawfully killed skateboard faggot who occasionally beat his girlfriend.

3
17pat76 3 points ago +3 / -0

That guy shouldn’t have raised a felonious piece of shit

3
secretbern 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wearing a mask on zoom? Really?

3
POTUS_DonnieJ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Judge should hold him in contempt of court. Send bailiffs to his home. What a sack of shit.

3
Deplorable002 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fucked around and found out. Raise your kids better. Like Rittenhouse, such a fine example of nice young man.

3
chahn1138 3 points ago +3 / -0

Discovering that the Father is a waste-of-skin Ass-Wipe is not surprising.

He raised a Loser and a Burden to Society....a Bundle of Sticks, if you will.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
midoridesu 3 points ago +3 / -0

The mask at home is a nice touch.

3
toxic7 3 points ago +3 / -0

get fucked

3
xXFuckYourFeelingsXx 3 points ago +3 / -0

So the dad is a piece of shit, just like his son.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
RockFlagAndEagle2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

Charge that asshole with contempt for that finger.

3
booshdag 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe if he raised his son to not attack armed people at riots his son wouldn't be such a dead faggot.

3
Drcm 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like father like son I guess

3
Final_Arbiter 3 points ago +3 / -0

OP, Can you please specify exactly which POS that Kyle ridded our society of? All 3 are solid candidates...

2
Bigsweaties 2 points ago +2 / -0

FAFO

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is Bryan Cranston secretly Mark Richards?