I said we needed more legal pedes back in 2016. I was downvoted (back on TDr) for suggesting any of us become lowly legal types. I also warned about the dipshit we can't name from the former site name.
People need to think about the future more. The patterns are known and established. Just open your eyes, folks.
Legalpede here; and while this sentiment is good - the entire law community is wholly overrun with leftist zealots.
My first day of skoolin they forced us to read and "discuss" "Between the world and me" by Ta-Nahisi Coats. Of course the discussion was only of approved anti-white ideology, and it was strictly verboten to point out the vile hate that blowhard spewed into those pages. The remainder of skoolin wasn't any better, and it's a shark tank of sjw zealots who will ensure you're ostracized both in school, and in the legal networks that might hire you afterwards.
Taking back systems is important, but the entire law community, both judges and lawyers, may be too corrupt and indoctrinated to turn back.
Spez'd: “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”
― Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome
Too corrupt and indoctrinated is no excuse for not trying. We don't fight like the French. It's not enough to make a show fight and promptly surrender. We have to keep up the pressure. And pile on every little victory we can get.
The left was up against it when they started thier ' long march' through the institutions. It was slow at first and fast in the end. It's only fair that our march starts off not so easy as well.
IMO, Kyle should prepare and go on the RUN, ASAP...he gonna get his ass railroaded with this SJW system and end up with a lifetime of jogger prison rape. That boy needs to lose/gain weight have plastic surgery and fucking run to the ends of the earth if need be. No way that boy is getting a fair fucking trial.
Morons. The law is written to be confusing so that us morons cannot ever interpret it. Anyone who would suggest that we skip our understanding of legalese is a simple person. Understanding and application of the law does not indicate ones level of morality. This is a fickle crew prone to it's own type of virtue signaling at times.
Ehh sorry I have to disagree. The problem is that law is (supposed to be) an application of logic, which requires very precise language. The average person doesn't have the logical ability necessary to read such things, regardless of how it's written, because there is no way way to write it such that it is both precise and easy to understand. Personally, I think written language is actually insufficient for law, and should probably be written in pure mathematical logic. Then you wouldn't have people arguing about what "well regulated" means and such.
You're both right and wrong. It's not that there aren't enough MAGA lawyers (definitely not enough), it's that one commie AG in a blue city can coopt the legal system and force cases like these to be seen in front of only leftists juries. That goes all the way up to the federal gov't and is why all political cases are only ever brought in SDNY or the DC Circuit. It's a rotten system.
Some progress non-legalpedes can do; in Red states, start petitioning the state legislatures to better restrict jurisdictions and start sending more court cases out of the State Capital where all the partisan hack judges and AGs live.
We need people to go after them. We need to control the legal syste
I said we needed more legal pedes back in 2016. I was downvoted (back on TDr) for suggesting any of us become lowly legal types. I also warned about the dipshit we can't name from the former site name.
People need to think about the future more. The patterns are known and established. Just open your eyes, folks.
Legalpede here; and while this sentiment is good - the entire law community is wholly overrun with leftist zealots. My first day of skoolin they forced us to read and "discuss" "Between the world and me" by Ta-Nahisi Coats. Of course the discussion was only of approved anti-white ideology, and it was strictly verboten to point out the vile hate that blowhard spewed into those pages. The remainder of skoolin wasn't any better, and it's a shark tank of sjw zealots who will ensure you're ostracized both in school, and in the legal networks that might hire you afterwards. Taking back systems is important, but the entire law community, both judges and lawyers, may be too corrupt and indoctrinated to turn back.
Spez'd: “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” ― Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome
Hang them all, gotcha.
Im ok with that.
Exactly. The fucking constitution isn't open for interpretation.
“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.” ― Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome
salus populi suprema lex
The Reno brothers
👍
Too corrupt and indoctrinated is no excuse for not trying. We don't fight like the French. It's not enough to make a show fight and promptly surrender. We have to keep up the pressure. And pile on every little victory we can get.
The left was up against it when they started thier ' long march' through the institutions. It was slow at first and fast in the end. It's only fair that our march starts off not so easy as well.
"We don't fight like the French. It's not enough to make a show fight and promptly surrender."
LMAO that's rich. Care to remind me what happened last election ?
IMO, Kyle should prepare and go on the RUN, ASAP...he gonna get his ass railroaded with this SJW system and end up with a lifetime of jogger prison rape. That boy needs to lose/gain weight have plastic surgery and fucking run to the ends of the earth if need be. No way that boy is getting a fair fucking trial.
Nice commentary fren 👍
Morons. The law is written to be confusing so that us morons cannot ever interpret it. Anyone who would suggest that we skip our understanding of legalese is a simple person. Understanding and application of the law does not indicate ones level of morality. This is a fickle crew prone to it's own type of virtue signaling at times.
Ehh sorry I have to disagree. The problem is that law is (supposed to be) an application of logic, which requires very precise language. The average person doesn't have the logical ability necessary to read such things, regardless of how it's written, because there is no way way to write it such that it is both precise and easy to understand. Personally, I think written language is actually insufficient for law, and should probably be written in pure mathematical logic. Then you wouldn't have people arguing about what "well regulated" means and such.
Disagree about "average person" and logic. It just ain't that damned hard. The problem is school became designed to make people not think.
You are intelligent enough to know that we are both correct.
You're both right and wrong. It's not that there aren't enough MAGA lawyers (definitely not enough), it's that one commie AG in a blue city can coopt the legal system and force cases like these to be seen in front of only leftists juries. That goes all the way up to the federal gov't and is why all political cases are only ever brought in SDNY or the DC Circuit. It's a rotten system.
Some progress non-legalpedes can do; in Red states, start petitioning the state legislatures to better restrict jurisdictions and start sending more court cases out of the State Capital where all the partisan hack judges and AGs live.
No, but we should expect it to work.
We are emcee going to control the legal system.
We need to realize who controls the legal system, and call them out on it. They always use litigation as a weapon.