Feds should sell all that land to individual landowners (pedes) and pay down some debt. Pedes can then frack, build pipelines and whatnot to restore energy independence.
Bingo- seems rather fitting- make a place only used to heat become bitter cold and icy for the sake of destruction and stupid so called reducing the carbon emissions
This shit isn't effective at all. Wind and solar are expensive to build, their power generation is completely unreliable meaning you need traditional power plants on 80% standby at all times to step in for their unreliable asses.
If not for Govt money and bribes, this crap would be nonexistent except for fringe uses.
Why do all the RED states have GREEN energy?
Part of the color revolution?
lots and lots of federal land out west... almost all of it.
Land here in Texas is all privately owned
Texas has small % but still 3M acres... NV 85%, AZ 38%, CA 45%.
Texas is more south than west.. sorry Tx
[hide]Federal land ownership by state (as of 2013) State Federal land acreage Total state acreage Percentage of federal land United States total 623,313,931 2,271,343,360 27.4% Alaska 223,803,098 365,481,600 61.2% Texas 2,998,280 168,217,600 1.8% California 45,864,800 100,206,720 45.8% Montana 27,003,251 93,271,040 29.0% New Mexico 26,981,490 77,766,400 34.7% Arizona 28,064,307 72,688,000 38.6% Nevada 59,681,502 70,264,320 84.9% Colorado 23,870,652 66,485,760 35.9% Wyoming 30,013,219 62,343,040 48.1% Oregon 32,614,185 61,598,720 52.9% Idaho 32,621,631 52,933,120 61.6% Utah 34,202,920 52,696,960 64.9% Kansas 272,987 52,510,720 0.5% Minnesota 3,491,586 51,205,760 6.8% Nebraska 546,759 49,031,680 1.1% South Dakota 2,642,601 48,881,920 5.4% North Dakota 1,736,611 44,452,480 3.9% Missouri 1,635,122 44,248,320 3.7% Oklahoma 701,365 44,087,680 1.6%
Feds should sell all that land to individual landowners (pedes) and pay down some debt. Pedes can then frack, build pipelines and whatnot to restore energy independence.
Can't have Xiden's "dark winter" without it.
Bingo- seems rather fitting- make a place only used to heat become bitter cold and icy for the sake of destruction and stupid so called reducing the carbon emissions
Well to be fair they are the only areas where they'd be somewhat effective.
This shit isn't effective at all. Wind and solar are expensive to build, their power generation is completely unreliable meaning you need traditional power plants on 80% standby at all times to step in for their unreliable asses.
If not for Govt money and bribes, this crap would be nonexistent except for fringe uses.
They are somewhat effective if you just use lefty logic and disregard all the negatives you just said.
And they decommission nuclear power while subsidize green.