174
Comments (26)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
FreeSpeechMaster 5 points ago +6 / -1

This is exactly why women shouldn't be able to hold office or be judges or lawyers.

2
Pierre_Delectoes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its why we need actual oversight of judges. Judges hold almost unlimited power and they face zero oversight unless they piss off the wrong powerful people who can afford to fund a challenger (for elected judges) or pay the right people to impeach the judge (for appointed ones).

Judges should be appointed and their appointments should need renewed every year. Just like any private sector contractor, if your performance isn't up to snuff, you're gone.

2
FreeSpeechMaster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Civilian oversight. Lottery draw, so you can't stack committees with liberal sub-humans.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
3
EuroPatriot 3 points ago +4 / -1

There are women that would do the job better than most men. But while the average woman judge might have the same university degrees, she's more leftist, emotional and arbitrary.

Besides, women and men have different social roles. Feminism has been saying that traditional female roles are worthless and been judging women by men standards such as having a career.

A smart woman raising many children to be good people deserves more praise and respect than one becoming a successful lawyer by sacrificing family.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
FreeSpeechMaster 2 points ago +3 / -1

I love Candace, but she is a little too green to hold any office at the moment. Yes, Trumps female Press Secretaries were awesome, but that is not an "office".

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
2
FreeSpeechMaster 2 points ago +3 / -1

Nope.