1020
Comments (47)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
TwistedSister [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Good info. At least he should know soon enough and we'll know soon enough just how unpopular he really is.

15
goldkeyboardwarrior 15 points ago +15 / -0

He already knows. He doesn't give a shit because he knows there aren't nearly enough people in the Senate to vote to remove him and the Dems aren't going to vote to remove because they know his replacement probably won't be a RINO like Romney is.

3
Leatherwood 3 points ago +5 / -2

SEEMS LIKE THE STATE SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO REMOVE A SENATOR WHO IS NOT WORKING FOR THEM. IF NOT, THEN THERE NEED TO BE SOME LAWS CHANGED. TALK ABOUT A RIGGED SYSTEM.

2
TwistedSister [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

They do, but it requires 2-3rds vote.

2
Leatherwood 2 points ago +4 / -2

UNDERSTAND. I AM SAYING THAT IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH. LAW SHOULD BE CHANGED. THAT IS FEDERAL POWER TO REMOVE A SENATOR. STATE SEEMS PRETTY POWERLESS. IN GENERAL, STATES NEED TO EXERCISE MORE STATE SOVEREIGNTY. WE NEED TO REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE FEDERAL GOV. BY ABOUT 90%.

1
goldkeyboardwarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution would need to be amended. There's no way that will happen, especially since many of the people involved would be voting to make it easier for their constituents to fire them.

Even if we went with the constitutional convention route, that's probably not going to work either with the deep blue states voting against it because their Deep State senators don't want to put their seats at risk.

1
ontothefuture 1 point ago +1 / -0

The state legislature needs to pas this bill.

https://le.utah.gov/~2020/bills/static/HB0217.html