This post is very misleading. Bannon is not opposed to investigating the machines. His concern was that the machine issue was too complicated to prove in a timely fashion. He felt that there was "low hanging fruit" in some states that was much easier to prove. He has had Mike Lindell on his show to go through his documentary and he did a 3 hour special with Lindell that was aired on OAN. Bannon played the role of devil's advocate so that Lindell could respond to claims people are making about Lindell's movie. Bannon did that since Dominion would not appear.
Bailed on this dunce in June 2020 and the pitiful Warroom Pandemic show which was and still is a patheticly opaque grift and boring in ways that make you think of the good old days of watching paint dry.
He recognized that the machines are a difficult argument to prove, and one that you don’t need to rely upon to achieve the objective.
And he is correct — notice that the media and the NPCs argue the ‘muh machines changing votes is a conspiracy’ at the exclusion of everything else?
And can you point me to a single source that puts forth a competent and fulsome ‘proof’ for it, that doesn’t involve blindly trusting anonymous sources and their undocumented spreadsheets?
The Dominion stuff is still in the circumstantial and indirectly documented with a lot of disinformation, false denials expressed with high confidence, and truths that require complex explanations or analysis. Part of the problem is that the Dominion machines have not been subject to any fulsome forensic audit (a huge red flag in itself!). As a comparison, consider the Enron scandal. We know and can explain what happened, but how would you prove it?
These are the best I have found, and none even attempt to conclusively prove the argument:
Dominion and the foreign connection is sourced in footnotes in Sydney Powell’s lawsuit here:
This is the most “validated authority” story reported instance so far, for which you can find multiple articles from many sources (here’s one) — Dems refuse to believe it and simply claim that it’s misinformation from Trump’s team:
We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results,” the audit report charged. “The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.”*
Allied Security Operations Group concludes that the Dominion system “should not be used in Michigan” and the Antrim County results “should not have been certified.”*
There are big differences between suspecting, inferring, and demonstrably proving, and argument against opposing narratives for immediate actions should be based on the strongest of those.
That said, actual forensic audits of the Dominion machines are crucial.
That said, actual forensic audits of the Dominion machines are crucial.
I was reading your comment saying "but, but, but" and then you said it. It's unproven because it's untested. And I wonder if it were tested, now could it even be proven, 3+ months of software/firmware updates later.
I still think pointing out all of the statistical anomalies while stating that the left has refused to allow audits of the machines is an important point to keep hammering on, but yeah, likely the least actionable as of right now.
I wish there were some journalist who would put together the credible case on Dominion (combining analysis of known election numbers to extrapolate against like data comparisons on the Dominion data that IS out there), and basically separating the ‘wheat from the chaff’ into an article or study fit for sharing.
As it stands, so much around Dominion are claims that have disappeared into the censored server farms of Twitter, broad claims about what could have happened, ‘proofs’ that hang out there without reply to what seems like weak ‘debunking’ by the MSM (but seem stronger when unanswered), and “absolute proof” that turns out to be recordings of non-experts claiming second-hand what “their people” assure them is the case, often with tables of ‘switched votes’ or ‘hack traces’ that are unverifiable. For instance, I keep hearing that Sydney Powell was given ‘bad data’ that ‘discredited her case’, but nobody can ever even describe what the data in question is, or what about it is being contested! And why did Lindell have time to produce a 2-hour TV special but hasn’t had time to release a .pdf showing his underlying data?
It seems clear that there is an un-yet written story to be told about how and why overseas ‘algorithms’ needed to be ‘hacked’ into the machines. There are scattered data scientists who showed what seemed to be patterns of fraud that proved manipulation, at least in some stage of reporting the votes, and I have no doubt that something like ‘Scorecard’ or ‘Hammer’ software would be deployed by Deep Staters...
...but why Byrne, Lindell, Powell, and others will go 95% of the way to investigate the situation, and not close the distance by putting together some readable report that is more than initial-preliminary limited data, “just trust me” claims or incomplete screenshots of numbers that have inexactly described meanings?
What are they waiting for, or what’s stopping them?
I agree with Tucker Carlson on that point: show us what proof you have!
Dominion machines are fixed! Oh and China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus. There. Said it!
If anyone mentions voter fraud are they immediately fined and punished? Only Levin and a few others still mention it and the rest have been silenced by the Democrats. It will labeled "hate speech" and a felony by the end of the year.
This post is very misleading. Bannon is not opposed to investigating the machines. His concern was that the machine issue was too complicated to prove in a timely fashion. He felt that there was "low hanging fruit" in some states that was much easier to prove. He has had Mike Lindell on his show to go through his documentary and he did a 3 hour special with Lindell that was aired on OAN. Bannon played the role of devil's advocate so that Lindell could respond to claims people are making about Lindell's movie. Bannon did that since Dominion would not appear.
Sloppy Steve.
Bailed on this dunce in June 2020 and the pitiful Warroom Pandemic show which was and still is a patheticly opaque grift and boring in ways that make you think of the good old days of watching paint dry.
He recognized that the machines are a difficult argument to prove, and one that you don’t need to rely upon to achieve the objective.
And he is correct — notice that the media and the NPCs argue the ‘muh machines changing votes is a conspiracy’ at the exclusion of everything else?
And can you point me to a single source that puts forth a competent and fulsome ‘proof’ for it, that doesn’t involve blindly trusting anonymous sources and their undocumented spreadsheets?
The Dominion stuff is still in the circumstantial and indirectly documented with a lot of disinformation, false denials expressed with high confidence, and truths that require complex explanations or analysis. Part of the problem is that the Dominion machines have not been subject to any fulsome forensic audit (a huge red flag in itself!). As a comparison, consider the Enron scandal. We know and can explain what happened, but how would you prove it?
These are the best I have found, and none even attempt to conclusively prove the argument:
https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020.pdf
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/?s=Dominion
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/one-vote-matters-weighted-race-distribution-one-california-vote-brings-entire-2020-election-question/
https://www.dailywire.com/news/judge-releases-dominion-audit-report-report-claims-system-designed-to-create-systemic-fraud
There are big differences between suspecting, inferring, and demonstrably proving, and argument against opposing narratives for immediate actions should be based on the strongest of those.
That said, actual forensic audits of the Dominion machines are crucial.
I was reading your comment saying "but, but, but" and then you said it. It's unproven because it's untested. And I wonder if it were tested, now could it even be proven, 3+ months of software/firmware updates later.
I still think pointing out all of the statistical anomalies while stating that the left has refused to allow audits of the machines is an important point to keep hammering on, but yeah, likely the least actionable as of right now.
I wish there were some journalist who would put together the credible case on Dominion (combining analysis of known election numbers to extrapolate against like data comparisons on the Dominion data that IS out there), and basically separating the ‘wheat from the chaff’ into an article or study fit for sharing.
As it stands, so much around Dominion are claims that have disappeared into the censored server farms of Twitter, broad claims about what could have happened, ‘proofs’ that hang out there without reply to what seems like weak ‘debunking’ by the MSM (but seem stronger when unanswered), and “absolute proof” that turns out to be recordings of non-experts claiming second-hand what “their people” assure them is the case, often with tables of ‘switched votes’ or ‘hack traces’ that are unverifiable. For instance, I keep hearing that Sydney Powell was given ‘bad data’ that ‘discredited her case’, but nobody can ever even describe what the data in question is, or what about it is being contested! And why did Lindell have time to produce a 2-hour TV special but hasn’t had time to release a .pdf showing his underlying data?
It seems clear that there is an un-yet written story to be told about how and why overseas ‘algorithms’ needed to be ‘hacked’ into the machines. There are scattered data scientists who showed what seemed to be patterns of fraud that proved manipulation, at least in some stage of reporting the votes, and I have no doubt that something like ‘Scorecard’ or ‘Hammer’ software would be deployed by Deep Staters...
...but why Byrne, Lindell, Powell, and others will go 95% of the way to investigate the situation, and not close the distance by putting together some readable report that is more than initial-preliminary limited data, “just trust me” claims or incomplete screenshots of numbers that have inexactly described meanings?
What are they waiting for, or what’s stopping them?
I agree with Tucker Carlson on that point: show us what proof you have!
Dominion machines are fixed! Oh and China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus, China virus. There. Said it!
If anyone mentions voter fraud are they immediately fined and punished? Only Levin and a few others still mention it and the rest have been silenced by the Democrats. It will labeled "hate speech" and a felony by the end of the year.
THE "FAKE BALLOTS" ARE FAR MORE IMPORTANT....
FAKE PAPER BALLOTS - once in the vote stream - can not be pulled out.
Sloppy Steve has and always will be a sad pathetic drunk and grifter. He is not a friend to the American people.
Didnt Bannon literally defraud people over a fake wall?
No — the charges are exaggerated BS in the same vein of the charges against Flynn.
Totally agree.
He's right about CHYNA. But that seems about it.
I do agree
Bannon wants the ballots. So do I. We've known the machines were rigged. Check yourself, before you check another, brother.
As I live and breath right this minute, Bannon is talking about election fraud and saying “we will never accept that Biden won...”
There are a lot of retarded people, yes.
We need to be Stiffer than Bannon. And we can be.
I love Steve but he is not the only player on the field.
Hold on. Hold on. Hold on.