I matched with this super pretty girl a few days ago on tinder and we hung out i cooked her dinner watched a movie ect. She got mad when she saw my trump flag when she walked past my room. She asked how i could support such an evil man. I asked her what makes him so evil she sat there for awhile and said he ruined the us and hes a racist. I tokd her to say his policies that ruined America and how he was racist. She brought up the classic all mexicans are rapists i showed her the full clip she said she had no idea it was out of context. She couldnt name any executive orders or policies. I showed her all his accomplishments and the part of the Capitol speech where he says peacefully. Again she never saw either and she said she feels bad for blindly hating him and admitted she didnt look for the truth because of snopes
Comments (139)
sorted by:
As long as she's not stupid, she'll be fine going to college as long as it's for a useful degree. I've been in college and I'm not indoctrinated. In fact, their stupidity that they're peddling redpilled me more than anything. But I was always based. Just reinforced it for me. I'm just not blind to the truth.
Yup, I was raised conservative, but my real redpill was high school English when my teacher decided to spend a unit talking about feminism and the wage gap.
I was slightly put off by "feminism" but I went in with an open mind, but as with anything I did not leave my critical thinking at the door.
First critical thought: so if women will work for only 70% of a man's wage for the same work, that means I could run a company, pay women 80% of a wage, which would be a 20% savings on wages, make a killing and be hailed as a champion of gender equality for bringing us 1 step closer to equality and empowering women
Second critical thought shortly after: so why isn't everyone just hiring women then? If companies will penny pinch to save a fraction of a cent on a product, surely they'd put aside any sexism against women for up to a 30% savings on wages right?
After 15 mins of research back at home: ah. So the wage gap is actually a gross oversimplification of just dividing the average salary of a woman by the average for a man? It doesn't take any factors into account at all? Not even career field/position, seniority or overtime hours? Oh, and it's already illegal to pay differently based on gender since 1963?