And there is the problem. You state no evidence for election fraud with no reason given. Anyone here most likely watched most of if not all of the congressional hearings on election fraud, watched mike lindells video, and watched/read other sources showing the fraud. Also some have even followed the election fraud cases and seen the courts play standing games. They did that so the case could be dismissed without having to actually hear the evidence within the case. Its called process rulings not rulings on the merit.

So actually the majority of people here very well versed on what evidence exists on election fraud. Where as you either are a troll or are very ignorant of the evidence. So yes the NASA analogy does fit.