“One can — and should — condemn the January 6 riot without inflating the threat it posed. And one can — and should — insist on both factual accuracy and sober restraint without standing accused of sympathy for the rioters,” he concluded.
But it's not a riot. And nobody is obligated to condemn it. He makes some good points but condemning the "riot" still plays right into the propaganda.
There was a day when 'left wing' and 'journalist' would have been two separate terms in that headline. One wouldn't effect the other.
Thanks GG - you are a patriot, no matter your political leanings.
“One can — and should — condemn the January 6 riot without inflating the threat it posed. And one can — and should — insist on both factual accuracy and sober restraint without standing accused of sympathy for the rioters,” he concluded.
But it's not a riot. And nobody is obligated to condemn it. He makes some good points but condemning the "riot" still plays right into the propaganda.