If the power of government rests on the widespread acceptance of false indeed absurd and foolish ideas, then the only genuine protection is the systematic attack of these ideas and the propagation and proliferation of true ones.
Awesome pics. Great size. Look thick. Solid. Tight. Keep us all posted on your continued progress with any new progress pics or vid clips. Show us what you got man. Wanna see how freakin' huge, solid, thick and tight you can get. Thanks for the motivation.
I get the impression that Hans-Hermann Hoppe might be controlled opposition, given that he supposedly invited the likes of Richard Spencer (whom is controlled opposition to the extreme) to speak at an organization he founded (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans-Hermann_Hoppe ):
Hoppe has been criticized for repeatedly inviting white nationalist speakers such as Peter Brimelow, and neo-Nazi Richard B. Spencer, to speak at the PFS.[13]
Funny thing about being an ardent free speech extremist(there are a few of us out there), is no fucks are given if the person is controlled op. The point is to give wide ranging, divisive, and actual diverse views and people the forum to hear them, debate them, dispute them, and form their own rationale.
Funny thing about being an ardent free speech extremist(there are a few of us out there), is no fucks are given if the person is controlled op. The point is to give wide ranging, divisive, and actual diverse views and people the forum to hear them, debate them, dispute them, and form their own rationale.
But you don't need to invite extremely controlled opposition people to speak at your organization if you are an "ardent free speech extremist". And since when would Richard Spencer have interesting things to say? He doesn't even believe his own claims at all whatsoever.
What are your thoughts on image boards? And how much free speech would you say that there is on this forum relative to various other groups of sites?
You invite anyone you want to, controlled or not. If a person is controversial over the long term, you want them. For the simple reason that usually the worst person pushing the shit message that pisses people off aka "bad speech" are the ones who give a warning sign of where censors and authoritarians are moving to censor similar speech.
What are your thoughts on image boards? And how much free speech would you say that there is on this forum relative to various other groups of sites?
I'd say they're pretty much today's political soap box. You get uncommon views, and sometimes interesting lines of thoughts from people. In both text and memes/images itself. As for speech on this site vs other sites? Well if you compare it to something like facebook, it's leagues above in terms of openness.
If you're looking at it from a pure free speech angle? It's limited speech, something that's spelled out right in the first rule(Trump supporters only). Gaming, Meta, and OmegaCanada have more open speech then T_D/Patriots. And really that's perfectly fine, since it spells it out right at the start.
So you don't believe your own words at all whatsoever. You are directly, intentionally against free speech, and you are fully aware of that. You merely pretend to be for free speech.
You invite anyone you want to, controlled or not. If a person is controversial over the long term, you want them. For the simple reason that usually the worst person pushing the shit message that pisses people off aka "bad speech" are the ones who give a warning sign of where censors and authoritarians are moving to censor similar speech.
So one should help extremely controlled opposition people as much as possible? And this have nothing to do with "pisses people off" or " "bad speech" ", and you know that fully well. There are much more controversial non-extreme-controlled opposition people than Richard Spencer that you could invite reg. helping free speech that would have meaningful things to say.
And it doesn't seem to have been in the spirit of free speech that Richard Spencer was invited in any way whatsoever, especially because the MSM very much likes to give speaking time to extremely controlled opposition people like Richard Spencer.
And if they were for free speech, why not host the Muhammed cartoons? Why do they hold their conferences in Turkey, which is not at all known for free speech?..............................
Again: But you don't need to invite extremely controlled opposition people to speak at your organization if you are an "ardent free speech extremist". And since when would Richard Spencer have interesting things to say? He doesn't even believe his own claims at all whatsoever.
Reg. image boards:
Even this forum has much more limited free speech reg. political topics that are very much relevant to Trump supporters than multiple image boards, and you ought to be well aware of that (and you might well be fully aware of that). And describing them as "political soap boxes"..........
Have you ever visited image boards? How much time have you spent there?
So you don't believe your own words at all whatsoever. You are directly, intentionally against free speech, and you are fully aware of that. You merely pretend to be for free speech.
That makes no actual sense based on what I said, but as a supposition based on what I said it makes sense, in your framework. Then again, making such a shit supposition based on short statements is more of your problem then mine.
So one should help extremely controlled opposition people as much as possible? ...
You mean, one should help those who have their speech cut off by other actors? Yes. There are other people, though you seem to forget something. Notability helps. I seem to be missing the part where the MSM regularly gives Spenser talking and speech status. If you mean the MSM regularly talks about Spenser then I'd agree.
Have you ever visited image boards? How much time have you spent there?
Apparently more then you have, since I can remember the days when 2ch was geolocked and 4chan didn't exist.
I like seeing quotes like this. Every once in a while I'm exposed to someone I've never heard of. Different people have a different way of presenting ideas, and sometimes it helps to get a big dose of someone new.
This is one of the main reasons why I use quotes and attribute them to their author.
In the hopes that some pedes will be intrigued enough to read or listen to those who eloquently argue for Liberty.
History is ultimately determined by ideas, and ideas can, at least in principle, change almost instantly. But in order for ideas to change it is not sufficient for people to see that something is wrong. At least a significant number must also be intelligent enough to recognize what it is that is wrong. That is, they must understand the basic principles upon which society — human cooperation — rests … And they must have sufficient will power to act according to this insight.
I love how you're on here giving us traffic and increasing our Alexa ranking in the top thousand. Thanks for your continuous support, we look forward to your reply! 👌
This is why the press is constantly full of lies. There’s a monocultural bubble where nobody in their environment challenges anything, and they’re looking to purge anyone else who does.
I agree the globalists are communists but I think China isn’t in control of the globalists. China is just more useful to the globalists at the moment because of their existing totalitarianism. Once they crash the dollar and really get this great reset started China’s nationalism is going to cause them to be brought to heel by the globalists. Am I getting too crazy? Is this a conspiracy? I can no longer tell.
China was setup as the model for world government by the globalists with the intention of rolling it out everywhere else. It is their creation.
China will always be useful to the globalists. Once they have the full world goverment system (which they will never get) they plan on using the chinks as their world wide enforcement arm.
China would still be poor farmers riding fucking bicycles in the countryside living in straw huts if they were not propped up by the globalists and the world would be a much better place if that country was left in the fucking dark ages.
Yep, globalists propped up China for their next socialism experiment after Soviet Union. State corporatism will be the model for the rest of the world.
No, you aren’t crazy, and aren’t the first to notice.
“The most loathsome after-birth of the [First] World War has been the revival of this internationalism which in its last analysis is nothing more than universal class rule. On the one hand the Soviet desires to control the entire world by the military arm of an enslaved laboring class. And on the part of certain captains of industry and finance there seems to be a determination to rule the universe through the agency of wealth."
-Father Coughlin, 1930
Father Coughlin (the Rush of the 1930s) is a favorite bugbear of the left who they still like to bring up from time to time to slander, but his observations were clear-eyed. Internationalism = globalism, the Soviets were replaced by the CCP, and captains of industry and finance are now led by Big Tech
Edit: Forgot to add that part of the reason why Soviet communism got destroyed was due to CoCom and the tighter implementation of export controls. By the late 70s/early 80’s it was clear that the Soviets had fallen behind the U.S. in military technology (e.g. by >5 years for computers. Patriots implemented export controls to stop the leak of Western technology that the Soviets used to stay relevant
The globalists’ role becomes spotlighted when you realize that concurrently in the 1970s, free trade orthodoxy began to be pushed hard culturally across the West. Free trade allows easier circumvention of export controls and drains middle class wealth while enriching the elite.
Meanwhile, China began to somehow simultaneously reform its communist system to accept free market principles. While pretending to be free market, the American non-globalist elite gullibly off-shored our country to China
Communism is a tool used by globalists to destroy nations' power structures and take them over in the vacuum that results.
This is why communism was created.
China is a globalist power base, i fully believe Xi is a puppet in the same way Biden is. He sold out for globalist cash, and that cash has fuelled the development of modern china. Their existing totalitarianism is by design, not coincidence.
It's not just China though. Saudi Arabia, the EU, Israel, and just about every other country has been ripping us off all the same. China is a bit different because they're a geopolitical adversary, but globalism is unfortunately supported by capitalists as much as it is by communists.
The intelligence agencies have been completely out of control for far too long. The first thing Trump should do if he somehow gets back in office is disband them.
Mark Felt - the #2 guy at the FBI leaked to the Washington Post, using them to destroy Nixon because Nixon didn't select him as the FBI Director.
Doesn't mean Nixon was completely clean, but the FBI took him out, the same as they tried to do to Trump.
The FBI needs to be abolished completely. The only other option is to fire their entire leadership structure, but I doubt that would work because they likely hire only cucks.
Within 25 years of the FBI's founding, they were already abusing their power to gather blackmail material on US congressmen and presidents. They've been dirty since the day they were "born".
Yep. The pipe bombs never existed and it was just a false story sent out by the fbi using glowies. The 'evidence' was probably some random asshole on some random comment section talking about it.
There has been no corroboration of the fbi's story that the dc police found pipe bombs. No photos no physical evidence nothing that would normally be shown in a situation like this. Until hard physical evidence is shown its all fabrication. Do you think the dc police leadership or fbi wouldn't lie to attack Trump and his supporters?
Why would anyone who supports Trump set up a pipe bomb? For what? Trump has had hundred of rallies with a bigger turnout than the amount of people who came on the Capitol. Not once was there ever fights, or any problems. Coincidentally though, now at the Capitol there is. Like, give me a break. Let's just say it was a Trump supporter like you're assuming, what would be the benefit? Absolutely none.
Guess who has blown the Capitol before though? BLM founders, and ANTIFA is a terrorist organization. People loving their President who is non-violent himself aren't going to threaten nobody.
Use common sense. Candace herself has been assaulted by ANTIFA in a restaurant before. You don't hear ever stories of Trump supporters touching anyone.
The letter from the Capitol Police said they heard about the bombs right before the protesters got into the building. At minimum I think it was meant as a distraction to lure the Guards away. The cops were already understaffed for the amount of people.
Uh? That still doesn’t make any sense. So, if people are unstable, why didn’t they cause harm at his previous rallies, especially against groups like ANTIFA and others for revenge then? Which has never happened.
So? A stolen election doesn’t give enough a motivator. There would not be a benefit.
Link to footage? I heard the bomb stories mentioned heavily for about an hour, then it dwindled, and the next day everyone was talking about fire extinguishers. You'd think if that was real and they were still on the look out, that would be a real story. The way they seem unconcerned about pipe bombs, which would be acts of terrorism, really suggests the story fell apart. There was also a weird omission of detail about where exactly they were. Just "headquarters".
And the way they're going after all the grandmas at the rally and their relatives who didn't even go, it's hard to believe they aren't able to find out about these. Especially if they had footage, as you say...
I should be specific. There was footage of some random person wearing a mask supposedly near either the rnc or dnc carrying something. It probably wouldn't be hard to find but I didn't look into it. For all I kno it wasn't near either of the hq and the person wasn't doing anything suspicious.
I looked it up after your comment. With the info released, it's really hard to evaluate the story. What you described is nearly all of the info they put out, at least that I found. Is it normal to have such little information about that? Doesn't seem normal to me. Then again, the media hardly cared about the recent Nashville bombing.
They put a search for the person in the footage. I could only find a screen shot and not anything about how they came to suspect that person, since the picture is not a great link if taken alone.
Yea what I saw was a 5 sec video of the person walking around the corner. I'm guessing that was the screenshot you saw. I'm pretty sure I'd seen it on here or TDW but I didn't save it. Otherwise I would've linked it. If it's not a trump supporter, (and it doesn't look like one since they're wearing a mask but who knows) I doubt they're gonna look very hard even if it's true. But I can also see why it'd be hard to find them since they're covering their face and with only a short camera clip to go off of. I still wonder why a hq building wouldn't have more cameras tho, and I would think that facial recognition software would be advanced enough to figure out who it is. But again, Idk.
What damage does placing two pipe bombs do? It seems to me that right wing extremists are not focused on property damage. Maybe some were pissed and RNC and DNC but I didn’t hear or see anything online which would have indicated ANYONE on the right wanted to terrorize either organization.
It works to Antifa’s disadvantage that the militant right may even take a contrarian stance to their tactics. Setting off an IED at the headquarters of either organization sounds like weather underground, antifa type business.
The bombs themselves had 1 hour timers on them, not trip wires. They were placed on the night of January 5th and found on January 6th, suggesting that they were never activated. Even if they were activated, there's no chance anyone would have been walking by at the exact moment they detonated, and it's not like a 1lb pipe bomb could damage the building.
It was either a distraction or some absolute retard, not something meant to actually harm anyone/anything.
How do we know it wasn't a transvestite infiltrator send by ISIS to carry out a terrorist attack on US soil, while being payed of with surgery costs for his transition? We don't. In the absence of any proof a million baseless assertions all can be made with equal viability. Unfortunately for this line of reasoning if you were to draw a venn diagram of "the people who hate the RNC establishment" and "the people who hate the DNC establishment", the overlap would capture most sentient life.
It's REALLY DISGUSTING that they always bring up the death toll, when it was us who killed. Fucking disgusting using our own deaths against us. They should all burn.
Thank you, Candice, for having the courage to speak the truth. As President Trump said, "We are the party of law and order!" The real domestic terrorists, aka
socialist leftists, seem to forget that!
I don't know if she is allowed to say this openly... Its going to red pill too many people. Has not she heard of the lady with GREENE in her name? Oh my wow, tomorrow will be a snowstorm in the news.
And our poor elected officials pissed themselves and had to put a fish bowl on their head when they thought they would once have to face the people they've been fucking for a hundred years. Fuck them.
Was the woman trump supporter the one that was trampled? Someone told me the trampled person was a woman from Georgia and another said she was a female cop. I haven't bothered to look it up due to all the fake news surrounding the protest.
Three more trump supporters with histories of health problems died: Kevin Greeson died of a heart attack Benjamin Phillips died of a stroke
I can't find the name of the fifth
There were a few heart attacks among Trump supporters if I'm not mistaken and their deaths were blamed on the rally. Sicknick died from having a stroke later on, possibly from the teargas and then there were and additional two deaths I believe from suicides in the days passing they tried to pin on the protest.
We all do, but I haven't followed it too closely. Lots of convenient suicides over the years and unfortunately they never get exposed even the ones that are obviously homicides.
I expect an irrational, emotional reaction devoid of any facts, with a few fraudulent headlines from the first page of results from a manipulated Google search.
Ive been a daily thedonald user since 2015 and I had no idea that there were no pipe bombs used. It's insane how much the media can push their bullshit on everyone without me ever turning on the tv
I just search and here are the allegations I found. You can search it too but I opened a cuck news source and archive isn't working for Dissenter browser, so not linking here.
FBI says they were planted the night before, around 8:30pm. CUck news still links this to "Trump incitement", so now I guess Trump incited a day or more early -- makes total sense. Completely coherent with letting protesters inside. edit: and to add layers to the coherence... the plan was to bomb the site Trump protesters were about to "riot" in. Sounds like a Trump supporter.
There's a photo of some masked guy in a hoodie loosely carrying a bag, which you can't see. The bag is pretty small.
Said it was found by chance in the RNC around the time people went in. edit2: and again, implying that this should have been detonated when a bunch of MAGA protesters were thought to be breaking in.
Says it's unknown why they didn't explode.
Allegedly detonated by robots. No information surrounding the damage, no pictures, no forensic information. You'd think there would be curiosity about the nature of it, given the possible threat of poisons or something.
I have family members that are part of the "but people died, how dare you!" crowd and it boils my blood when they try to use the deaths on the 6th to support condemning Trump or the people there. They killed us. I don't need the Left to remind me people died, they're our people and the Left are the ones who killed them.
That isn't actually true. We literally still have no idea because despite all footage being combed over by half the fugging FBI, they still didn't find the jackass who dropped off a package at the DNC and RNC headquarters. Might be a Trump supporter, might be Antifa, might be a Chinese spy, might even be a transvestite infiltrator from ISIS who got paid off in surgery costs to attempt a terrorist attack. We literally have no idea.
I listened to a live she did on instagram and I think she's going by her theory that the FBI knows who put the pipe bombs there, and that if it HAD been a Trump supporter they would have come out with that. Since they didn't, it wasn't a Trump supporter.
Nothing to verify that either way, but it kind of makes sense.
I mean in all fairness, I did witness a cop get beat, and beat, and beat some more... Lets be honest about what happened in DC, then we can figure out who, and why.
Triple H?
https://www.instagram.com/p/BZ9w1tgBR6x/
Awesome pics. Great size. Look thick. Solid. Tight. Keep us all posted on your continued progress with any new progress pics or vid clips. Show us what you got man. Wanna see how freakin' huge, solid, thick and tight you can get. Thanks for the motivation.
That's not me, it's a picture of Michael Malice giving Hans-Hermann Hoppe (Originator of the idea of "physical removal") a toy helicopter.
It saddens me that no one gets this.
I've got your back, though, bruh.
We're all gonna make it.
Saddens me too
The classiest bb.com /misc/ meme
Glad there's some aware brahs on here too. Everyone who downvoted it is on dat phaggy time cuz.
There is HHHoppe, but only if we take action.
A Wrestling fan I see?
I get the impression that Hans-Hermann Hoppe might be controlled opposition, given that he supposedly invited the likes of Richard Spencer (whom is controlled opposition to the extreme) to speak at an organization he founded (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans-Hermann_Hoppe ):
Funny thing about being an ardent free speech extremist(there are a few of us out there), is no fucks are given if the person is controlled op. The point is to give wide ranging, divisive, and actual diverse views and people the forum to hear them, debate them, dispute them, and form their own rationale.
But you don't need to invite extremely controlled opposition people to speak at your organization if you are an "ardent free speech extremist". And since when would Richard Spencer have interesting things to say? He doesn't even believe his own claims at all whatsoever.
What are your thoughts on image boards? And how much free speech would you say that there is on this forum relative to various other groups of sites?
You invite anyone you want to, controlled or not. If a person is controversial over the long term, you want them. For the simple reason that usually the worst person pushing the shit message that pisses people off aka "bad speech" are the ones who give a warning sign of where censors and authoritarians are moving to censor similar speech.
I'd say they're pretty much today's political soap box. You get uncommon views, and sometimes interesting lines of thoughts from people. In both text and memes/images itself. As for speech on this site vs other sites? Well if you compare it to something like facebook, it's leagues above in terms of openness.
If you're looking at it from a pure free speech angle? It's limited speech, something that's spelled out right in the first rule(Trump supporters only). Gaming, Meta, and OmegaCanada have more open speech then T_D/Patriots. And really that's perfectly fine, since it spells it out right at the start.
So you don't believe your own words at all whatsoever. You are directly, intentionally against free speech, and you are fully aware of that. You merely pretend to be for free speech.
So one should help extremely controlled opposition people as much as possible? And this have nothing to do with "pisses people off" or " "bad speech" ", and you know that fully well. There are much more controversial non-extreme-controlled opposition people than Richard Spencer that you could invite reg. helping free speech that would have meaningful things to say.
And it doesn't seem to have been in the spirit of free speech that Richard Spencer was invited in any way whatsoever, especially because the MSM very much likes to give speaking time to extremely controlled opposition people like Richard Spencer.
And if they were for free speech, why not host the Muhammed cartoons? Why do they hold their conferences in Turkey, which is not at all known for free speech?..............................
Again: But you don't need to invite extremely controlled opposition people to speak at your organization if you are an "ardent free speech extremist". And since when would Richard Spencer have interesting things to say? He doesn't even believe his own claims at all whatsoever.
Reg. image boards:
Even this forum has much more limited free speech reg. political topics that are very much relevant to Trump supporters than multiple image boards, and you ought to be well aware of that (and you might well be fully aware of that). And describing them as "political soap boxes"..........
Have you ever visited image boards? How much time have you spent there?
That makes no actual sense based on what I said, but as a supposition based on what I said it makes sense, in your framework. Then again, making such a shit supposition based on short statements is more of your problem then mine.
You mean, one should help those who have their speech cut off by other actors? Yes. There are other people, though you seem to forget something. Notability helps. I seem to be missing the part where the MSM regularly gives Spenser talking and speech status. If you mean the MSM regularly talks about Spenser then I'd agree.
Apparently more then you have, since I can remember the days when 2ch was geolocked and 4chan didn't exist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9IihASzMhU
I like seeing quotes like this. Every once in a while I'm exposed to someone I've never heard of. Different people have a different way of presenting ideas, and sometimes it helps to get a big dose of someone new.
This is one of the main reasons why I use quotes and attribute them to their author.
In the hopes that some pedes will be intrigued enough to read or listen to those who eloquently argue for Liberty.
I love how you're on here giving us traffic and increasing our Alexa ranking in the top thousand. Thanks for your continuous support, we look forward to your reply! 👌
You seem like a small tent kinda guy.
The depredations of government change over-time, but the moral arguments against such coercion always remain the same.
"You may be dump, but you aren't stupid" - Grassshrimp
90% of the press is owned by 5 companies.
90% of reporters in the industry are Democrats.
90% of academics are Democrats.
This is why the press is constantly full of lies. There’s a monocultural bubble where nobody in their environment challenges anything, and they’re looking to purge anyone else who does.
It isn't Republican vs Democrat anymore, it's patriots vs globalists.
Patriots vs communists
I am beginning to think globalist just means you fully support China and if that’s the case, you’re communist.
I agree the globalists are communists but I think China isn’t in control of the globalists. China is just more useful to the globalists at the moment because of their existing totalitarianism. Once they crash the dollar and really get this great reset started China’s nationalism is going to cause them to be brought to heel by the globalists. Am I getting too crazy? Is this a conspiracy? I can no longer tell.
China was setup as the model for world government by the globalists with the intention of rolling it out everywhere else. It is their creation.
China will always be useful to the globalists. Once they have the full world goverment system (which they will never get) they plan on using the chinks as their world wide enforcement arm.
China would still be poor farmers riding fucking bicycles in the countryside living in straw huts if they were not propped up by the globalists and the world would be a much better place if that country was left in the fucking dark ages.
Yep, globalists propped up China for their next socialism experiment after Soviet Union. State corporatism will be the model for the rest of the world.
No, you aren’t crazy, and aren’t the first to notice. “The most loathsome after-birth of the [First] World War has been the revival of this internationalism which in its last analysis is nothing more than universal class rule. On the one hand the Soviet desires to control the entire world by the military arm of an enslaved laboring class. And on the part of certain captains of industry and finance there seems to be a determination to rule the universe through the agency of wealth." -Father Coughlin, 1930 Father Coughlin (the Rush of the 1930s) is a favorite bugbear of the left who they still like to bring up from time to time to slander, but his observations were clear-eyed. Internationalism = globalism, the Soviets were replaced by the CCP, and captains of industry and finance are now led by Big Tech
Edit: Forgot to add that part of the reason why Soviet communism got destroyed was due to CoCom and the tighter implementation of export controls. By the late 70s/early 80’s it was clear that the Soviets had fallen behind the U.S. in military technology (e.g. by >5 years for computers. Patriots implemented export controls to stop the leak of Western technology that the Soviets used to stay relevant
The globalists’ role becomes spotlighted when you realize that concurrently in the 1970s, free trade orthodoxy began to be pushed hard culturally across the West. Free trade allows easier circumvention of export controls and drains middle class wealth while enriching the elite.
Meanwhile, China began to somehow simultaneously reform its communist system to accept free market principles. While pretending to be free market, the American non-globalist elite gullibly off-shored our country to China
Globalists arent communists.
Communism is a tool used by globalists to destroy nations' power structures and take them over in the vacuum that results.
This is why communism was created.
China is a globalist power base, i fully believe Xi is a puppet in the same way Biden is. He sold out for globalist cash, and that cash has fuelled the development of modern china. Their existing totalitarianism is by design, not coincidence.
I read that and it makes complete sense, but the battle between the globalists and the Chinese will be brutal.
Sometimes I wonder if Islam was ever really truly a threat or just a game.
It's not just China though. Saudi Arabia, the EU, Israel, and just about every other country has been ripping us off all the same. China is a bit different because they're a geopolitical adversary, but globalism is unfortunately supported by capitalists as much as it is by communists.
Or everybody with a common sense vs a cult of non-theistic progressive leftists.
FBI faggots planted that shit. None of em will get in trouble though. Fucking circle jerk pivot men
The intelligence agencies have been completely out of control for far too long. The first thing Trump should do if he somehow gets back in office is disband them.
Mark Felt - the #2 guy at the FBI leaked to the Washington Post, using them to destroy Nixon because Nixon didn't select him as the FBI Director.
Doesn't mean Nixon was completely clean, but the FBI took him out, the same as they tried to do to Trump.
The FBI needs to be abolished completely. The only other option is to fire their entire leadership structure, but I doubt that would work because they likely hire only cucks.
Within 25 years of the FBI's founding, they were already abusing their power to gather blackmail material on US congressmen and presidents. They've been dirty since the day they were "born".
^^^ . THIS . ^^^^^^
Did you see my comment yesterday on this??? Either way, thanks for spreading the word.
Trump is the SECOND (or maybe third?) president duly elected and removed by an FBI coup.
http://abriefhistory.org/?p=638
He should cut their pensions to a mere fraction of what they will otherwise get.
Dissolving them would just scatter them to the winds.
Trump needs to have a clandestine military operation to literally call everyone in and then bomb the fucking places.
The military is not much better, at least not the top brass.
The FBI should all get the 1st electric cars.
They're didn't do Sl-l!T in stopping massive voting fraud anyways.
Federal Bureau of Incompetence!
We have investigated ourselves and determined ourselves innocent.
Fuck the federal bureau of Imbeciles. The stasi for the corrupt demoKKKrat party
Soooo ... no insurrection or domestic terrorism happened then?
youdontsay.gif
Down the Rabbitt Hole:
https://patriots.win/p/12hRCFi4r1/suppression-of-false-flag-discus/
What does an antifa/blm riot have in common with a MAGA "riot"?
Trump supporters get hunted and killed
Excellent point!
Who was behind the pipe bombs?
Nancereeeeeeeeeeeeee Pelosreeeeeeeeeee
Yep. The pipe bombs never existed and it was just a false story sent out by the fbi using glowies. The 'evidence' was probably some random asshole on some random comment section talking about it.
like the water pipe bursting in Fulton County.
Sauce? The story I saw said the bombs were placed the night before (Jan 5th)
There has been no corroboration of the fbi's story that the dc police found pipe bombs. No photos no physical evidence nothing that would normally be shown in a situation like this. Until hard physical evidence is shown its all fabrication. Do you think the dc police leadership or fbi wouldn't lie to attack Trump and his supporters?
How do we know it wasn't a rogue <INSERT POLITICAL FIGURE> voter?
:I
We don't. That's why we don't say we know who didn't do it.
Why would anyone who supports Trump set up a pipe bomb? For what? Trump has had hundred of rallies with a bigger turnout than the amount of people who came on the Capitol. Not once was there ever fights, or any problems. Coincidentally though, now at the Capitol there is. Like, give me a break. Let's just say it was a Trump supporter like you're assuming, what would be the benefit? Absolutely none.
Guess who has blown the Capitol before though? BLM founders, and ANTIFA is a terrorist organization. People loving their President who is non-violent himself aren't going to threaten nobody.
Use common sense. Candace herself has been assaulted by ANTIFA in a restaurant before. You don't hear ever stories of Trump supporters touching anyone.
The letter from the Capitol Police said they heard about the bombs right before the protesters got into the building. At minimum I think it was meant as a distraction to lure the Guards away. The cops were already understaffed for the amount of people.
Why.
You asked why?
They stole an election and some people are less stable than others. Don't pretend we don't have our own crazies. It's naive to think that.
She presented a list of things that have been proven. And then added this. I missed where that was proven.
Uh? That still doesn’t make any sense. So, if people are unstable, why didn’t they cause harm at his previous rallies, especially against groups like ANTIFA and others for revenge then? Which has never happened.
So? A stolen election doesn’t give enough a motivator. There would not be a benefit.
You’re grasping at straws.
There was camera footage
Link to footage? I heard the bomb stories mentioned heavily for about an hour, then it dwindled, and the next day everyone was talking about fire extinguishers. You'd think if that was real and they were still on the look out, that would be a real story. The way they seem unconcerned about pipe bombs, which would be acts of terrorism, really suggests the story fell apart. There was also a weird omission of detail about where exactly they were. Just "headquarters".
And the way they're going after all the grandmas at the rally and their relatives who didn't even go, it's hard to believe they aren't able to find out about these. Especially if they had footage, as you say...
This is all the footage and information they've put out
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/seeking-info/suspected-pipe-bombs-in-washington-dc
https://www.fbi.gov/@@dvpdffiles/0/6/06105e14a90a4781bc9bf441822217ad/normal/dump_1.gif
I should be specific. There was footage of some random person wearing a mask supposedly near either the rnc or dnc carrying something. It probably wouldn't be hard to find but I didn't look into it. For all I kno it wasn't near either of the hq and the person wasn't doing anything suspicious.
I looked it up after your comment. With the info released, it's really hard to evaluate the story. What you described is nearly all of the info they put out, at least that I found. Is it normal to have such little information about that? Doesn't seem normal to me. Then again, the media hardly cared about the recent Nashville bombing.
They put a search for the person in the footage. I could only find a screen shot and not anything about how they came to suspect that person, since the picture is not a great link if taken alone.
Yea what I saw was a 5 sec video of the person walking around the corner. I'm guessing that was the screenshot you saw. I'm pretty sure I'd seen it on here or TDW but I didn't save it. Otherwise I would've linked it. If it's not a trump supporter, (and it doesn't look like one since they're wearing a mask but who knows) I doubt they're gonna look very hard even if it's true. But I can also see why it'd be hard to find them since they're covering their face and with only a short camera clip to go off of. I still wonder why a hq building wouldn't have more cameras tho, and I would think that facial recognition software would be advanced enough to figure out who it is. But again, Idk.
I saw one of those fire extinguishers. On the floor outside back of the Capitol. I wish I had photographed it.
Of a guy in a hoodie and a mask. That's inconclusive.
Aren't you smart lol
What damage does placing two pipe bombs do? It seems to me that right wing extremists are not focused on property damage. Maybe some were pissed and RNC and DNC but I didn’t hear or see anything online which would have indicated ANYONE on the right wanted to terrorize either organization.
It works to Antifa’s disadvantage that the militant right may even take a contrarian stance to their tactics. Setting off an IED at the headquarters of either organization sounds like weather underground, antifa type business.
The bombs themselves had 1 hour timers on them, not trip wires. They were placed on the night of January 5th and found on January 6th, suggesting that they were never activated. Even if they were activated, there's no chance anyone would have been walking by at the exact moment they detonated, and it's not like a 1lb pipe bomb could damage the building.
It was either a distraction or some absolute retard, not something meant to actually harm anyone/anything.
How do we know it wasn't a transvestite infiltrator send by ISIS to carry out a terrorist attack on US soil, while being payed of with surgery costs for his transition? We don't. In the absence of any proof a million baseless assertions all can be made with equal viability. Unfortunately for this line of reasoning if you were to draw a venn diagram of "the people who hate the RNC establishment" and "the people who hate the DNC establishment", the overlap would capture most sentient life.
Right. We don't. She presented theory as fact.
Is THAT what they call the people who wear the vests that go boom? I get it. The vest transits the body and other things too.
It's REALLY DISGUSTING that they always bring up the death toll, when it was us who killed. Fucking disgusting using our own deaths against us. They should all burn.
"Violent kent state protestors caused 4 deaths this week..."
Thank you, Candice, for having the courage to speak the truth. As President Trump said, "We are the party of law and order!" The real domestic terrorists, aka socialist leftists, seem to forget that!
What do we know about the boogaloo bombs boys
I don't know if she is allowed to say this openly... Its going to red pill too many people. Has not she heard of the lady with GREENE in her name? Oh my wow, tomorrow will be a snowstorm in the news.
Absolutely fuck the msm.
By visiting this site and getting real news, you are fucking the MSM with a spiked baseball bat.
Wait. Apart from the unarmed woman, who else died that was a Trump supporter? I discounted any report after her (since we could actually see her).
One person had a stroke. One person had a heart attack. One person was trampled. And the cop was never beaten to death
And our poor elected officials pissed themselves and had to put a fish bowl on their head when they thought they would once have to face the people they've been fucking for a hundred years. Fuck them.
That’s the best part of the whole day tbh
I can't believe we're supposed to feel bad for confronting the subhumans who actually hold responsibility for fucking shit up.
Was the woman trump supporter the one that was trampled? Someone told me the trampled person was a woman from Georgia and another said she was a female cop. I haven't bothered to look it up due to all the fake news surrounding the protest.
Yes the one who got trampled was a woman. IDK if she was a cop. Another woman was shot, she was a veteran.
She was some big woman, not a cop, probably also got gassed.
I belive the cops were Trump supporters.
One trump supporter, Brian Sicknick, died of a stroke the next day after reporting feeling fine following the riot. He was initially reported as being bludgeoned to death with a fire extinguisher, even though the only injuries he had were from pepper spray
Another trump supporter, Rosanne Boyland was accidentally trampled to death.
Three more trump supporters with histories of health problems died:
Kevin Greeson died of a heart attack
Benjamin Phillips died of a stroke
I can't find the name of the fifth
Ashli Babbitt was the 5th.
He said other than Ashli. There were supposedly 3 who died of underlying health conditions but I can't find the name of the third one.
There were a few heart attacks among Trump supporters if I'm not mistaken and their deaths were blamed on the rally. Sicknick died from having a stroke later on, possibly from the teargas and then there were and additional two deaths I believe from suicides in the days passing they tried to pin on the protest.
I wonder what the reason behind their suicides were
We all do, but I haven't followed it too closely. Lots of convenient suicides over the years and unfortunately they never get exposed even the ones that are obviously homicides.
One possibility would be covering up their involvement in letting the protesters in.
This lady claims Kevin Greeson's death was caused by police brutality.
https://vdare.com/posts/lauren-witzke-says-that-capitol-hill-police-brutality-caused-trump-supporter-kevin-greeson-s-death
and normies will never hear about this
Normies simply don't care about any politics.
they care about doing whatever tv says
Weren't the pipe bombs fake and weren't they placed January 5th? The news kept saying "no word if they were real pipe bombs."
It wasn't an insurrection.
Try explaining it to a democrat and let me know how it goes.
I expect an irrational, emotional reaction devoid of any facts, with a few fraudulent headlines from the first page of results from a manipulated Google search.
I hadn't heard about the pipe bombs. Were they debunked? No pipe bombs?
Placed prior to Jan 6th......... per FBI
Who did the pipe bombs?
I'm baffled she still has a twitter account. Fuck u twitter
The entire thing was staged using antifa members and crisis actors. Look at the videos all over the net.
Ive been a daily thedonald user since 2015 and I had no idea that there were no pipe bombs used. It's insane how much the media can push their bullshit on everyone without me ever turning on the tv
There were devices placed on Jan 5th. Not the 6 th. Timeline is important
Ahhh it's so hard to keep up. Fake news changes like the wind
candase owens is a very beautiful, and very smart woman. and even more awesome, a true patriot!!!
i could see her as the first female president someday.....
I didnt hear the pipe bombs were not real
...becsuse there was no riot or "insurrection".
Its a lie.
Fake insurrection in reality was a broken window. Put on a BLM hat next time and you will be allowed to burn it down without consequences
Wait, so the pipe bomb thing was fake? When did that news come out?
There's no evidence of it being real. Just a blurry picture of a dark figure.
"Dammit these Facts are soooooooooo annoying."
~~ Typical Liberal American Stooge
thanks for your voice but according to biden blacks are just to dumb to be able to use the internet
Twitter approved conservatives.
CNN paid insurectionis anarchistic terroristic lefties to storm the capitol ! They paid a domestic terrorist leader of BLM and Antifa Groups 70k !
Wait, there WEREN'T pipe bombs? I thought there were, but they targeted both the GOP and DNC buildings?
I just search and here are the allegations I found. You can search it too but I opened a cuck news source and archive isn't working for Dissenter browser, so not linking here.
The timers were kitchen timers... you can't set them for days later. Whole thing was a photo op.
No, read again - she says there were no pipe bombs placed ON Jan 6th. They could've been put there before.
this. Richard Jewell understands timelines...
Fucking disgusting how the media lies with impunity.
NO FACT CHECKS THERE 😏
RRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
And most of us were let and peacefully
I have family members that are part of the "but people died, how dare you!" crowd and it boils my blood when they try to use the deaths on the 6th to support condemning Trump or the people there. They killed us. I don't need the Left to remind me people died, they're our people and the Left are the ones who killed them.
I love Candace Owens. But she contradicts herself in her tweet. If #1 didn't happen. then why say #2 at all.
The pipe bombs were placed on the 5th, not the 6th.
1 may have happened the day before
No she didn't. Pipe bombs were placed before Jan 6 by whatever f#$ktard with access.
"No Trump Supporter was behind those pipbombs"
That isn't actually true. We literally still have no idea because despite all footage being combed over by half the fugging FBI, they still didn't find the jackass who dropped off a package at the DNC and RNC headquarters. Might be a Trump supporter, might be Antifa, might be a Chinese spy, might even be a transvestite infiltrator from ISIS who got paid off in surgery costs to attempt a terrorist attack. We literally have no idea.
I listened to a live she did on instagram and I think she's going by her theory that the FBI knows who put the pipe bombs there, and that if it HAD been a Trump supporter they would have come out with that. Since they didn't, it wasn't a Trump supporter.
Nothing to verify that either way, but it kind of makes sense.
I mean in all fairness, I did witness a cop get beat, and beat, and beat some more... Lets be honest about what happened in DC, then we can figure out who, and why.
The thumb in the cop's eye was pretty bad. There were assholes afoot.
Sooo ahhhhhh Candace can type what we already know to be true? I'm confusion.
The Jan 6 riots were a false flag. If you don’t believe me search up the meaning of “Babbitt”.
Looks like she’ll get censored soon.
saved
How do we know there were no pipe bombs?
They were placed sometime the day or night before, 1/5.
She forgot the unarmed woman who was murdered. Wasn't she shot in the back?
We all knew this we are just cucks and went home and did nothing as the country was stolen.