When she climbs through the window, how come nobody else is following her through? Also, she was mostly through the window when she gets shot, and to me it seems like she most likely would have fallen forward rather than backwards.
Maybe your sense of adventure is more developed than mine, but as for me- I would not be in a hurry to climb through a window I just saw someone get shot out of!
None of the following is meant to criticize OP or the opinions of anyone else in this thread, my razzing is aimed solely at the "logic" displayed by the maker of this video. <3 <3 <3
I appreciate the opportunity to see this presentation, and I hope the links and info show I am sincere in my efforts to verify the claims made in the video. Misinformation is the currency of the Enemies Of Freedom, let us not traffic in that coin.
For the sake of accuracy: she climbs into the broken window-frame, but is in no hurry to proceed. (Note there is a barricade of furniture pushed against the doors from the other side.) There is broken glass in the window-frame, on the floor behind her, and presumably on the other side. She appears to be (per the rules of normal human behavior) cautiously trying to decide how to proceed (or not) without cutting herself, more hesitant than determined to charge right through. She is also not looking in the direction of the shooter, she is watching her footing and likely never saw him.
Also important: other videos show congressmen or capitol staff standing not far from the barricade as the window-breaking begins, calmly talking among themselves. They do not seem to be fleeing the trespassers, even as the windows are being broken. Just before the shooting, some videos show men in business attire standing further down the hall- again showing no signs of alarm.
The police "guarding" the doors stand by calmly as young men get right in their face and punch past their heads breaking the windows. The SWAT team's demeanor is rather casual as they nudge through the group to the broken-window area before retreating to the stairwell around the corner. The only officer I have seen in these videos acting in an agitated manner is the one walking backwards baiting a group of people upstairs: if I remember correctly, he is the one who led them to this location. (I may be mistaken on that point, due to watching an overwhelming number of videos of this incident.)
I don't even know where to start with the obvious flaws in the video-maker's "reasoning," but I can address a few specific instances of CUBS (Complete Utter Bull Shit.) I will also try to make justice swift, and not squander time on the level of ridicule the video-maker deserves for putting such uninformed piffle out there.
He obviously knows little about glass: there are many different types of specialty/safety glass, all with their own breakage characteristics. Similar to tempered safety glass for autos (a plastic sheet sandwiched between 2 layers of glass) the "Georgian Wired Glass" often seen in public/institutional buildings like schools/hospitals has a thin mesh of wire embedded to keep it in one piece as it breaks (so to speak.) This would explain glass falling out as one sheet: that is what it is designed to do, if thus provoked. Not "conspiracy theory," conspiracy fact.
He also knows little about traumatic head injuries, or the nature of gunshot wounds. (ProTip: in real life, gunshot wounds do not always look like the gruesome gore-porn he watches on Netflix.) His uneducated guess concerning her hands is not just off-base: it's on the other side of the planet, desperately digging from China trying to get back to us here. A medical expert might call the reflexive tightening/spasms of her hands with arms drawn up a typical example of the "fencing response," in response to the traumatic injury to nerves in her neck (from the gunshot) and possibly to her head (from the fall.) Unless someone broke her fall, she certainly would have hit her head. (Yes, they lower her to the floor but some angles appear that she may have initially hit her head on the stairs' handrail fixture, and they are laying her down flat.) Note the "decorticate posturing" at this link, typical of this sort of injury. Not "conspiracy theory," conspiracy fact.
Not having seen the official ballistics report I can't say exactly where the round went into her neck (or if there was an exit wound.) I'm not going to speculate much until I do see the documents, but I have a preliminary theory or two based on medical fact. The lack of immediate obviously visible blood does not automatically mean the shooting was a hoax, that is a ludicrous leap of logic. As the article at this link states:
After the bullet enters through the skin, the skin retracts due to its elasticity. This will make the wound appear smaller than the bullet that has passed through. The bullet usually travels in a straight line, but its direction is unpredictable if it hits a bone. When this occurs, the bone may be shattered or the bullet may deflect and be sent to another area of the body.
From the same article, this very important point concerning exit wounds:
An exit wound, on the other hand, is larger and more irregular, with extruding tissue and no abrasion ring. There is far more blood that escapes an exit wound, and it can possibly be profuse.
The blood coming from her mouth a few seconds later is not unusual and has a logical explanation: liquids take the most available path of least resistance. There could have been a large exit wound in her throat/windpipe/bronchial area, with blood going into her lungs or mouth, coming up through a cough as her reflexes tried to clear her own airway. This would explain the less-obvious blood externally, compared to coming from her mouth (and if you've seen the tastelessly-published stills of her being taken away on a stretcher, she is a terrible mess minutes later.) To me, this seems much more plausible than someone squirting fake blood on her in front of an incoming full-alert SWAT team.
tl;dr This minimally-researched highly-speculative video (with more video-editing skills than common sense) proves nothing except the lengths that condescending internet-age children will go for clickbait and attention.
>Disclaimer: I have spent several hours daily analyzing various videos of this incident since it happened, with a Zapruder-film level of attention. As a long-time conspiracy-fact researcher, I am quite familiar with the concept of "poisoning the well" in terms of mixing far-fetched and illogical claims in with factual information. Example: "Hologram planes faked the WTC disaster on 911," which would require all eyewitnesses to be in on the hoax, etc etc
Thank you for your patience in reading all that : ) <3 <3 <3
I'm not saying the whole video presentation is dubious, but there are some very obvious inaccuracies and leaps of logic not backed up by anything. Considering how damaging misinformation and rumor can be to our efforts, I feel the need to point these things out when I see them- and back up my skepticism with the best information I have access to (be that articles from experts, general medical facts, or info from professionals I personally know. For example: I talked earlier with a longtime SWAT team member to get further insight on the rather questionable behavior/tactics seen in this incident and other issues concerning security of their equipment in a crowd situation, more on that in this post..)
It was done to make it look like trump caused her death. If she appeared to be a republican, they thought we would be angry at Trump for killling an innocent conservative woman.
Never undestimate the evil that flows through a politicians brain.
They dont have to explain anything. All they have to do is say it and their sheep believe it. They do not have to tell the truth because theres no consequences for lying.
They dony have to folow the law because nobody holds them accountable.
If you're still believing in truth and the rule of law then you've had your head in the sand.
The thing is that I do have some insights into how they operate. They'll still try to pin this on Trump. However it's an awfully elaborate thing to stage and isn't necessary for that. You would need to consider some other motive.
All they need to do to pin deaths on Trump is to just look at how many deaths were registered in Washington DC on the sixth and then just report that many people died on the sixth. It's probably a few hundred. They really don't need to do much at all to lie.
This level of effort doesn't match. It's way above the threshold required for the stated purposes. You get ~150 deaths per day in WDC. That's all you need to report. At least 150 people died during the protest on the 6th in Washington DC.
It's great because it's even true but you've not framed yourself for murder. There is in that a very compelling argument for it being staged. Why haven#t they release his name? Why haven't they pressed charges? The problem is we know the left regularly don't bother to pursue justice when the victims are their enemy.
First of all, she's not dead. Once you realize that, then it all.makes sense.
Second...You underestimate them. The deep state has a history of staging false flag events. They staged the capitol break in.
They have orchestrated riots, city takeovers, and numerous other events. To say something is too elaborate is naive. Nothing was too elaborate for their mission to take out Trump.
It took less than 20 people to pull this off. They do this in hollywood every day. Its not that hard. It was badly acted but they pulled it off. Watch the video and use your knowlege or learn about how police and medics handle a scene. The first thing law enforcement does at a shooting event is clear the scene. In what universe do people and police stand around and mingle at an active crime scene where a gun was fired?
Who would stand around without any concern and not even look toward the area of the gunfire to make sure another shot wasnt coming? Those people were just hanging around. Notice nobody was taking pictures? Thats not reality. In a real situation most wohld have quickly fled bit those staying behind would have had their phones out taking pictures. Nobody was doing that except the 1 or 2 people who made videos.
Even non medical people know you dont drag a body from.a scene because you could cause more harm moving them. Yet they drug her down the stairs rather than wait on medics. Not to mention they said she was dead so there was no need to move the body.
I saved footage of jayden x that seems to show a man being planted into the crowd. He is the guy wearing an inter milan football top (says pirelli on it). The same guy is the person who smahes the windows down just before AB tries to climb through. If he was a plant then whoever ordered him be planted bears some responsibility for this death.arguably most responsibility.
A gun was discharged and i seriously doubt any of the security in the building are loading blanks.
Since the morning of 1/7, I haven't heard a thing from her family or anything about the shooter... Like, AT ALL! Incidents like this WILL have some form of follow up story! Yet to see the video. But, Every other thing that took place inside of the capitol that day was staged... Hmmmm.🤔
No coroner report, never said what hospital she was taken to, no obituary, no funeral info. How come no one said anything but her husband and mother in law the day of. Nothing after. None of them have social media... blood would have been darker too and much more of it. It was definitely fake. Someone needs to find this girl, wherever she is
Thank you for posting this video, u/Salt-E45 ! I had not seen this one, and I appreciate any additional info on this incident (having watched many different angles at great length since that day.)
As I have done myself, I would recommend comparing as many videos as are available rather than basing ones' conclusion on just one video presentation (and as always, raw unedited footage is its own commentary.) Through viewing the various videos taken by different people in the group that day, I have learned many aspects of the incident that may/may not be seen in any one particular video. I recommend this open-minded approach to any video of a controversial nature, in order to truly get to the Real Story.
That said: there will be another post from me in this thread discussing various points of accuracy, with linked illustrations/articles to support my conclusions. I feel that it is important to show how/why I reach these opinions, rather than state the opinion unverified (as the makers of many "conspiracy theory"-related videos tend to do.)
I’m going to have to respectfully disagree with you - the glass in the door isn’t the point -
I know safety glass does brake out in one sheet - and I know different gun shot wounds bleed in different matters depending on the caliber type of round also what part of the body it hits - still not the point -
—
My personal opinion -The thing that stands out the most - she’s got a large backpack on -
To brake the fall - everyone is just standing around- making no real attempt to render aid
To her - the police do next to nothing to Control the scene - almost as if they are posing for pics — and to me the raw audio says it all - it’s not frantic sounding - it’s not Constant - it’s broken up - as if they are takes - just trying to make sound bites - to brake in to individual clips - The cops and rioters are all standing next to each other - almost as if they all know One another and trying to take a group photo - Some points in the video the
“Rioters“ put their hands on the cops back -
No cop would let a suspect stand behind them - let alone touch them - what’s to stop them from attacking or going for the officers weapon with their back turned - doesn’t add up- and the kid at the end during the interview with the “blood” on his hand -
Just looks like bad acting to me —
Also why were they allowed to leave the building - and Walk down the stairs -
You would think everyone in the hallway would have been arrested immediately
That’s my take on it anyway-
I urge everyone to watch the video and make your own conclusion - note the link isn’t to wooz news -
I tried to find it on the official Channel
But it looks like it was deleted or more likely taken down — can’t let something like this get out - right -
—
My goal in analyzing any event like this is to address the things that can be verified either visually, by common-sense, or by generally-accepted scientific/medical facts. I'm not saying everything about this video is false or fishy (apart from the editor's motives of self-promotion and/or distracting from facts by making wildly uninformed claims based on nothing more than his need for attention and unicorn farts.)
Example: Another issue I forgot to address: the video-maker obviously knows little about the artistic concept of "perspective," as he illustrates when he mis-interprets the angle of trajectory/the shooter's aim. (And he should probably take a look at this, while he's at it. Moar fun with that here.) He's also not considering that he doesn't understand how wide-angle lenses work, and how that could be distorting the perspective. This is why I'm very interested to see the official ballistics and autopsy reports, the shooter sweeps across the group and targets others trying to decide who to shoot.
As far as the backpack, lots of people had backpacks that day (for provisions etc.) It would be no surprise for someone to have a pillow or sleeping-bag in there, because under those conditions one might have to sleep in a spot of opportunity. (That day was full of unknowns, going in. As a military veteran, she would be well-trained in the ways of outdoor survival skills.) Even so, the padding effect of landing on that wouldn't protect her head (unless it got pulled upward) and could have worsened the stress on her neck upon impact. I'm still on the fence about whether she hit her head on the handrail fixture or the floor (some videos show them moving her slightly to a flatter position.) That's something I'm still trying to put together, so far due to the crowded conditions it's difficult to find an unobstructed video that shows her full path from the window to the floor.
The behavior of the police and SWAT though, I don't need video commentary to tell me that is some very fishy stuff. Cops (especially in a high-profile position like that) tend to be arrogant and demanding when on-duty. Under the circumstances, almost every cop we saw that day was being abnormally calm and non-confrontational. I don't get that at all- if they were that concerned about the doors being breached, they didn't show any sign of it until the shot.
None of the officers' behavior makes sense, and is often completely counter to normal tactics/safety practices/common sense- especially in failing to detain and question every person in that group. Normally, everyone in view of the shooting would be immediately against the wall or on the floor getting cuffed: those people were eyewitnesses to an officer-related shooting, I'm pretty sure that sending them away is not normal police procedure. That is a very serious breach of conduct and I have no explanation for that beyond dirty cops gonna dirty.
I have no explanation (beyond overconfidence) as to why the officers would just push through a group of un-frisked trespassers. That is either unbelievably careless, or utterly incompetent. As I said in another post, any accessories like ammo magazines/flash-bangs/pepper-spray not secured by some form of "retention holster"-style device (with a trick required to deploy) could easily be taken and used against them, were it merely held by a snap or velcro. (My SWAT-veteran associate tells me there are "retention" devices available for those accessories, but due to the "need for speed" these are not SOP except for possibly handcuffs. He also says it would be highly unusual for them to proceed into a group of "active protestors" in that manner without strong intelligence that they would be not likely to be armed or potentially violent. Additionally, he says SWAT officers place high confidence in their backup and are thus not very concerned with the possibility of having accessories snatched from their uniform.)
The video-editing is just messy, and difficult to tell if it is being chopped-up for time/pacing or if he's trying to hide/imply things. The audio is obviously even messier, I have not even started on that aspect (comparing ripped-from-video audio clips to see if certain "transients" line up, and to see if any fake/overdubbed elements are present in one video's audiotrack that are not in an otherwise similar one.)
tl;dr Defense attorneys love me, I'm their nightmare jury-duty candidate : )
Why didn’t the cop yell “get down” when she was climbing through the window? He was all shaky like a puss. I watched the video, I don’t think it was staged but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was. But why stage an unarmed female Trump supporter as the victim? Wouldn’t it make more sense if a fake Trump supporter “killed” a cop, and the cop disappears after the staged event, faking his death?
>Why didn’t the cop yell “get down” when she was climbing through the window?
I am very curious about that. Maybe as a capitol police rent-a-cop, he's not bound by the normal rules of engagement. It could be standard procedure to shoot without warning if they have a zero-tolerance policy on trespassers, hopefully we'll get some sort of explanation of that (the shooter is not going to be charged or even investigated properly, so we may be seeing him on "The View" or an Oprah interview.)
>Warning: the footage you are about to see is extremely "educational."
He's right about one thing there, anyway. I had no idea it was possible to fit that much inaccurate bullshit into a 21:25 video. I'm sort of impressed, uninformed know-it-all YouTube clickbaiters rarely have that level of incentive.
I apologize for my oversight. Had I caught that blurb at the beginning, I would have lit that video-editor up with every bit of the ridicule he deserves, and then some. (My other posts in this thread address the multiple areas of inaccuracy, easily rebutted with medical facts/common knowledge/personally-obtained information from experts.)
>The small number of speculations on my part are made obvious, while making effort to explain my reasoning. The editor of this video makes no such effort, choosing instead to rely fully on unsubstantiated guesses followed by jazz-hands.
Who stands around unconcerned after shots are fired? Notice that the people dont even seem concerned that a shot was fired? That is NOT normal. You can watch videos of gunfire in public places and the first thing people do is duck and scatter not mingle about taking pictures.
What is the first thing police do when they enter a crime scene? They clear the scene. Those police didnt even try to clear the scene. It was total chaos which is NOT normal for trained police.
The first thing a first responder will do in a gunshot wound situation is find the wound and hold pressure. Nobody even looked for a wound. Another first responder no no is to move the patient before medics arrive. Moving a person can cause more harm, especially if the patient has a neck injury. She fell backwards so she would be at high risk for a neck injury.
Notice the shooter never comes within view of the camera? Why? What police officer fires on a woman climbing through a window without warning her first? He didnt warn her he just shot the gun.
Either those people were horribly bad actors or they were completely incompetent.
My thoughts exactly - those cops were not acting as they should have in that situation - you would think they’d Clear the area ASAP or have everyone against the wall with their hands up - Try to render aid to the victim - - no let’s Have everyone crowding around with cameras - Let unknown “rioters” suspects whatever stand behind them with zero concern - that doesn’t add up
Nor were the people standing around - after someone is shot dead right in front of them - you’d think people would Have ran Away or dropped to the floor immediately after the shot Went off -
Lets see...a gunshot, a girl drops...you have to be pretty stupid to not know she was shot.
How would they know if they could do anything about the wound? They didnt even look for one. Any police or medic will look for a wound. Hell, even a dumb ass reporter would want to find the would just to get a pic. How would you know the shooter meant to kill? We didnt see him, we dont know who he is and we cant hear his story. Would he really try to kill a woman crawling through a window?
If those were real police, they were an embarassment to the entire profession.
I didn’t make the video-
Don’t shoot the messenger- I don’t Accept anything at face value - the video
makes a compelling argument -
Big ass backpack she was wearing - To break the fall - just makes ya think - I wouldn’t put anything past the left- evil bastards-
Any video on this incident is important and should be examined with an open mind. Even if a presenter's logic or motives are questionable, it's still worth a watch because there still could be information of value within. (Broken clock is correct twice a day, that kind of thing.)
I appreciate your curiosity and your input. Much better than just accepting a story without looking into it! <3 <3 <3
I believe was staged
When she climbs through the window, how come nobody else is following her through? Also, she was mostly through the window when she gets shot, and to me it seems like she most likely would have fallen forward rather than backwards.
Maybe your sense of adventure is more developed than mine, but as for me- I would not be in a hurry to climb through a window I just saw someone get shot out of!
None of the following is meant to criticize OP or the opinions of anyone else in this thread, my razzing is aimed solely at the "logic" displayed by the maker of this video. <3 <3 <3
I appreciate the opportunity to see this presentation, and I hope the links and info show I am sincere in my efforts to verify the claims made in the video. Misinformation is the currency of the Enemies Of Freedom, let us not traffic in that coin.
For the sake of accuracy: she climbs into the broken window-frame, but is in no hurry to proceed. (Note there is a barricade of furniture pushed against the doors from the other side.) There is broken glass in the window-frame, on the floor behind her, and presumably on the other side. She appears to be (per the rules of normal human behavior) cautiously trying to decide how to proceed (or not) without cutting herself, more hesitant than determined to charge right through. She is also not looking in the direction of the shooter, she is watching her footing and likely never saw him.
Also important: other videos show congressmen or capitol staff standing not far from the barricade as the window-breaking begins, calmly talking among themselves. They do not seem to be fleeing the trespassers, even as the windows are being broken. Just before the shooting, some videos show men in business attire standing further down the hall- again showing no signs of alarm.
The police "guarding" the doors stand by calmly as young men get right in their face and punch past their heads breaking the windows. The SWAT team's demeanor is rather casual as they nudge through the group to the broken-window area before retreating to the stairwell around the corner. The only officer I have seen in these videos acting in an agitated manner is the one walking backwards baiting a group of people upstairs: if I remember correctly, he is the one who led them to this location. (I may be mistaken on that point, due to watching an overwhelming number of videos of this incident.)
I don't even know where to start with the obvious flaws in the video-maker's "reasoning," but I can address a few specific instances of CUBS (Complete Utter Bull Shit.) I will also try to make justice swift, and not squander time on the level of ridicule the video-maker deserves for putting such uninformed piffle out there.
He obviously knows little about glass: there are many different types of specialty/safety glass, all with their own breakage characteristics. Similar to tempered safety glass for autos (a plastic sheet sandwiched between 2 layers of glass) the "Georgian Wired Glass" often seen in public/institutional buildings like schools/hospitals has a thin mesh of wire embedded to keep it in one piece as it breaks (so to speak.) This would explain glass falling out as one sheet: that is what it is designed to do, if thus provoked. Not "conspiracy theory," conspiracy fact.
He also knows little about traumatic head injuries, or the nature of gunshot wounds. (ProTip: in real life, gunshot wounds do not always look like the gruesome gore-porn he watches on Netflix.) His uneducated guess concerning her hands is not just off-base: it's on the other side of the planet, desperately digging from China trying to get back to us here. A medical expert might call the reflexive tightening/spasms of her hands with arms drawn up a typical example of the "fencing response," in response to the traumatic injury to nerves in her neck (from the gunshot) and possibly to her head (from the fall.) Unless someone broke her fall, she certainly would have hit her head. (Yes, they lower her to the floor but some angles appear that she may have initially hit her head on the stairs' handrail fixture, and they are laying her down flat.) Note the "decorticate posturing" at this link, typical of this sort of injury. Not "conspiracy theory," conspiracy fact.
Not having seen the official ballistics report I can't say exactly where the round went into her neck (or if there was an exit wound.) I'm not going to speculate much until I do see the documents, but I have a preliminary theory or two based on medical fact. The lack of immediate obviously visible blood does not automatically mean the shooting was a hoax, that is a ludicrous leap of logic. As the article at this link states:
From the same article, this very important point concerning exit wounds:
The blood coming from her mouth a few seconds later is not unusual and has a logical explanation: liquids take the most available path of least resistance. There could have been a large exit wound in her throat/windpipe/bronchial area, with blood going into her lungs or mouth, coming up through a cough as her reflexes tried to clear her own airway. This would explain the less-obvious blood externally, compared to coming from her mouth (and if you've seen the tastelessly-published stills of her being taken away on a stretcher, she is a terrible mess minutes later.) To me, this seems much more plausible than someone squirting fake blood on her in front of an incoming full-alert SWAT team.
tl;dr This minimally-researched highly-speculative video (with more video-editing skills than common sense) proves nothing except the lengths that condescending internet-age children will go for clickbait and attention.
>Disclaimer: I have spent several hours daily analyzing various videos of this incident since it happened, with a Zapruder-film level of attention. As a long-time conspiracy-fact researcher, I am quite familiar with the concept of "poisoning the well" in terms of mixing far-fetched and illogical claims in with factual information. Example: "Hologram planes faked the WTC disaster on 911," which would require all eyewitnesses to be in on the hoax, etc etc
Good read. The guy has a few interesting points but the glass thing was like, "dude. You don't know how different kinds of glass work?"
Thank you for your patience in reading all that : ) <3 <3 <3
I'm not saying the whole video presentation is dubious, but there are some very obvious inaccuracies and leaps of logic not backed up by anything. Considering how damaging misinformation and rumor can be to our efforts, I feel the need to point these things out when I see them- and back up my skepticism with the best information I have access to (be that articles from experts, general medical facts, or info from professionals I personally know. For example: I talked earlier with a longtime SWAT team member to get further insight on the rather questionable behavior/tactics seen in this incident and other issues concerning security of their equipment in a crowd situation, more on that in this post..)
I'm at a loss as to why they would stage themselves murdering an unarmed protester.
It was done to make it look like trump caused her death. If she appeared to be a republican, they thought we would be angry at Trump for killling an innocent conservative woman.
Never undestimate the evil that flows through a politicians brain.
There's no way you can make it look like that. It's just murder one.
No way you can make it look like that? Seriously? Do you ever watch movies?
Ask any police officer or medic that you know to look at that video and ask them if thats how they handle a scene like that.
But the truth will come out and i will be right again.
With this setup they would have to explain how Trump forced that man to murder that woman.
No, they would simply say that Trump incited people to go into the capitol and an innocent woman was killed because of it.
The footage shows it's murder though. If it's staged it's an odd choice.
They don't need footage when they can simply invent a body count.
They already invented at least three additional deaths.
Staging a death where you're committing murder one and then trying to pin it on someone not there isn't something I can easily explain.
You're framing yourself first and foremost.
You dont understand how they operate.
They dont have to explain anything. All they have to do is say it and their sheep believe it. They do not have to tell the truth because theres no consequences for lying.
They dony have to folow the law because nobody holds them accountable.
If you're still believing in truth and the rule of law then you've had your head in the sand.
The thing is that I do have some insights into how they operate. They'll still try to pin this on Trump. However it's an awfully elaborate thing to stage and isn't necessary for that. You would need to consider some other motive.
All they need to do to pin deaths on Trump is to just look at how many deaths were registered in Washington DC on the sixth and then just report that many people died on the sixth. It's probably a few hundred. They really don't need to do much at all to lie.
This level of effort doesn't match. It's way above the threshold required for the stated purposes. You get ~150 deaths per day in WDC. That's all you need to report. At least 150 people died during the protest on the 6th in Washington DC.
It's great because it's even true but you've not framed yourself for murder. There is in that a very compelling argument for it being staged. Why haven#t they release his name? Why haven't they pressed charges? The problem is we know the left regularly don't bother to pursue justice when the victims are their enemy.
First of all, she's not dead. Once you realize that, then it all.makes sense.
Second...You underestimate them. The deep state has a history of staging false flag events. They staged the capitol break in. They have orchestrated riots, city takeovers, and numerous other events. To say something is too elaborate is naive. Nothing was too elaborate for their mission to take out Trump.
It took less than 20 people to pull this off. They do this in hollywood every day. Its not that hard. It was badly acted but they pulled it off. Watch the video and use your knowlege or learn about how police and medics handle a scene. The first thing law enforcement does at a shooting event is clear the scene. In what universe do people and police stand around and mingle at an active crime scene where a gun was fired?
Who would stand around without any concern and not even look toward the area of the gunfire to make sure another shot wasnt coming? Those people were just hanging around. Notice nobody was taking pictures? Thats not reality. In a real situation most wohld have quickly fled bit those staying behind would have had their phones out taking pictures. Nobody was doing that except the 1 or 2 people who made videos.
Even non medical people know you dont drag a body from.a scene because you could cause more harm moving them. Yet they drug her down the stairs rather than wait on medics. Not to mention they said she was dead so there was no need to move the body.
The entire scene is not based in reality.
I saved footage of jayden x that seems to show a man being planted into the crowd. He is the guy wearing an inter milan football top (says pirelli on it). The same guy is the person who smahes the windows down just before AB tries to climb through. If he was a plant then whoever ordered him be planted bears some responsibility for this death.arguably most responsibility.
A gun was discharged and i seriously doubt any of the security in the building are loading blanks.
Since the morning of 1/7, I haven't heard a thing from her family or anything about the shooter... Like, AT ALL! Incidents like this WILL have some form of follow up story! Yet to see the video. But, Every other thing that took place inside of the capitol that day was staged... Hmmmm.🤔
The one story I found about her family was only comments from her husband and mother in law and they sounded pretty indifferent to her dying.
No coroner report, never said what hospital she was taken to, no obituary, no funeral info. How come no one said anything but her husband and mother in law the day of. Nothing after. None of them have social media... blood would have been darker too and much more of it. It was definitely fake. Someone needs to find this girl, wherever she is
Thank you for posting this video, u/Salt-E45 ! I had not seen this one, and I appreciate any additional info on this incident (having watched many different angles at great length since that day.)
As I have done myself, I would recommend comparing as many videos as are available rather than basing ones' conclusion on just one video presentation (and as always, raw unedited footage is its own commentary.) Through viewing the various videos taken by different people in the group that day, I have learned many aspects of the incident that may/may not be seen in any one particular video. I recommend this open-minded approach to any video of a controversial nature, in order to truly get to the Real Story.
That said: there will be another post from me in this thread discussing various points of accuracy, with linked illustrations/articles to support my conclusions. I feel that it is important to show how/why I reach these opinions, rather than state the opinion unverified (as the makers of many "conspiracy theory"-related videos tend to do.)
I’m going to have to respectfully disagree with you - the glass in the door isn’t the point - I know safety glass does brake out in one sheet - and I know different gun shot wounds bleed in different matters depending on the caliber type of round also what part of the body it hits - still not the point - — My personal opinion -The thing that stands out the most - she’s got a large backpack on - To brake the fall - everyone is just standing around- making no real attempt to render aid To her - the police do next to nothing to Control the scene - almost as if they are posing for pics — and to me the raw audio says it all - it’s not frantic sounding - it’s not Constant - it’s broken up - as if they are takes - just trying to make sound bites - to brake in to individual clips - The cops and rioters are all standing next to each other - almost as if they all know One another and trying to take a group photo - Some points in the video the “Rioters“ put their hands on the cops back - No cop would let a suspect stand behind them - let alone touch them - what’s to stop them from attacking or going for the officers weapon with their back turned - doesn’t add up- and the kid at the end during the interview with the “blood” on his hand - Just looks like bad acting to me — Also why were they allowed to leave the building - and Walk down the stairs - You would think everyone in the hallway would have been arrested immediately
That’s my take on it anyway- I urge everyone to watch the video and make your own conclusion - note the link isn’t to wooz news -
I tried to find it on the official Channel But it looks like it was deleted or more likely taken down — can’t let something like this get out - right - —
My goal in analyzing any event like this is to address the things that can be verified either visually, by common-sense, or by generally-accepted scientific/medical facts. I'm not saying everything about this video is false or fishy (apart from the editor's motives of self-promotion and/or distracting from facts by making wildly uninformed claims based on nothing more than his need for attention and unicorn farts.)
Example: Another issue I forgot to address: the video-maker obviously knows little about the artistic concept of "perspective," as he illustrates when he mis-interprets the angle of trajectory/the shooter's aim. (And he should probably take a look at this, while he's at it. Moar fun with that here.) He's also not considering that he doesn't understand how wide-angle lenses work, and how that could be distorting the perspective. This is why I'm very interested to see the official ballistics and autopsy reports, the shooter sweeps across the group and targets others trying to decide who to shoot.
As far as the backpack, lots of people had backpacks that day (for provisions etc.) It would be no surprise for someone to have a pillow or sleeping-bag in there, because under those conditions one might have to sleep in a spot of opportunity. (That day was full of unknowns, going in. As a military veteran, she would be well-trained in the ways of outdoor survival skills.) Even so, the padding effect of landing on that wouldn't protect her head (unless it got pulled upward) and could have worsened the stress on her neck upon impact. I'm still on the fence about whether she hit her head on the handrail fixture or the floor (some videos show them moving her slightly to a flatter position.) That's something I'm still trying to put together, so far due to the crowded conditions it's difficult to find an unobstructed video that shows her full path from the window to the floor.
The behavior of the police and SWAT though, I don't need video commentary to tell me that is some very fishy stuff. Cops (especially in a high-profile position like that) tend to be arrogant and demanding when on-duty. Under the circumstances, almost every cop we saw that day was being abnormally calm and non-confrontational. I don't get that at all- if they were that concerned about the doors being breached, they didn't show any sign of it until the shot. None of the officers' behavior makes sense, and is often completely counter to normal tactics/safety practices/common sense- especially in failing to detain and question every person in that group. Normally, everyone in view of the shooting would be immediately against the wall or on the floor getting cuffed: those people were eyewitnesses to an officer-related shooting, I'm pretty sure that sending them away is not normal police procedure. That is a very serious breach of conduct and I have no explanation for that beyond dirty cops gonna dirty.
I have no explanation (beyond overconfidence) as to why the officers would just push through a group of un-frisked trespassers. That is either unbelievably careless, or utterly incompetent. As I said in another post, any accessories like ammo magazines/flash-bangs/pepper-spray not secured by some form of "retention holster"-style device (with a trick required to deploy) could easily be taken and used against them, were it merely held by a snap or velcro. (My SWAT-veteran associate tells me there are "retention" devices available for those accessories, but due to the "need for speed" these are not SOP except for possibly handcuffs. He also says it would be highly unusual for them to proceed into a group of "active protestors" in that manner without strong intelligence that they would be not likely to be armed or potentially violent. Additionally, he says SWAT officers place high confidence in their backup and are thus not very concerned with the possibility of having accessories snatched from their uniform.)
The video-editing is just messy, and difficult to tell if it is being chopped-up for time/pacing or if he's trying to hide/imply things. The audio is obviously even messier, I have not even started on that aspect (comparing ripped-from-video audio clips to see if certain "transients" line up, and to see if any fake/overdubbed elements are present in one video's audiotrack that are not in an otherwise similar one.)
tl;dr Defense attorneys love me, I'm their nightmare jury-duty candidate : )
‘Sheep Dipping’ is the worst name for the military’s best job
Check out this emerging story:
https://trendingpolitics.com/breaking-cnn-paid-antifa-agitator-at-capitol-riots-now-weve-got-receipts-to-prove-it-knab/
Why didn’t the cop yell “get down” when she was climbing through the window? He was all shaky like a puss. I watched the video, I don’t think it was staged but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was. But why stage an unarmed female Trump supporter as the victim? Wouldn’t it make more sense if a fake Trump supporter “killed” a cop, and the cop disappears after the staged event, faking his death?
>Why didn’t the cop yell “get down” when she was climbing through the window?
I am very curious about that. Maybe as a capitol police rent-a-cop, he's not bound by the normal rules of engagement. It could be standard procedure to shoot without warning if they have a zero-tolerance policy on trespassers, hopefully we'll get some sort of explanation of that (the shooter is not going to be charged or even investigated properly, so we may be seeing him on "The View" or an Oprah interview.)
>Warning: the footage you are about to see is extremely "educational."
He's right about one thing there, anyway. I had no idea it was possible to fit that much inaccurate bullshit into a 21:25 video. I'm sort of impressed, uninformed know-it-all YouTube clickbaiters rarely have that level of incentive.
I apologize for my oversight. Had I caught that blurb at the beginning, I would have lit that video-editor up with every bit of the ridicule he deserves, and then some. (My other posts in this thread address the multiple areas of inaccuracy, easily rebutted with medical facts/common knowledge/personally-obtained information from experts.)
>The small number of speculations on my part are made obvious, while making effort to explain my reasoning. The editor of this video makes no such effort, choosing instead to rely fully on unsubstantiated guesses followed by jazz-hands.
Yea I’ve seen this video and I’m convinced this shit was completely staged. Seriously, if anyone is doubting it, watch the damn video.
Not cool Pede. Her family wouldn't appreciate this post.
did you watch it?
It was absolutely staged.
Who stands around unconcerned after shots are fired? Notice that the people dont even seem concerned that a shot was fired? That is NOT normal. You can watch videos of gunfire in public places and the first thing people do is duck and scatter not mingle about taking pictures.
What is the first thing police do when they enter a crime scene? They clear the scene. Those police didnt even try to clear the scene. It was total chaos which is NOT normal for trained police.
The first thing a first responder will do in a gunshot wound situation is find the wound and hold pressure. Nobody even looked for a wound. Another first responder no no is to move the patient before medics arrive. Moving a person can cause more harm, especially if the patient has a neck injury. She fell backwards so she would be at high risk for a neck injury.
Notice the shooter never comes within view of the camera? Why? What police officer fires on a woman climbing through a window without warning her first? He didnt warn her he just shot the gun.
Either those people were horribly bad actors or they were completely incompetent.
My thoughts exactly - those cops were not acting as they should have in that situation - you would think they’d Clear the area ASAP or have everyone against the wall with their hands up - Try to render aid to the victim - - no let’s Have everyone crowding around with cameras - Let unknown “rioters” suspects whatever stand behind them with zero concern - that doesn’t add up
Nor were the people standing around - after someone is shot dead right in front of them - you’d think people would Have ran Away or dropped to the floor immediately after the shot Went off -
Kind of fishy-
prolly incompetent tbh. many prolly didn't realize she was shot eh. and a wound like that you can't rly do anything anyway. the shooter meant to kill
Lets see...a gunshot, a girl drops...you have to be pretty stupid to not know she was shot.
How would they know if they could do anything about the wound? They didnt even look for one. Any police or medic will look for a wound. Hell, even a dumb ass reporter would want to find the would just to get a pic. How would you know the shooter meant to kill? We didnt see him, we dont know who he is and we cant hear his story. Would he really try to kill a woman crawling through a window?
If those were real police, they were an embarassment to the entire profession.
the shooter took his sweet time to adjust before they fired. you can't see the face but you can see the gun... and there isn't blood going everywhere.
I didn’t make the video- Don’t shoot the messenger- I don’t Accept anything at face value - the video makes a compelling argument - Big ass backpack she was wearing - To break the fall - just makes ya think - I wouldn’t put anything past the left- evil bastards-
Any video on this incident is important and should be examined with an open mind. Even if a presenter's logic or motives are questionable, it's still worth a watch because there still could be information of value within. (Broken clock is correct twice a day, that kind of thing.)
I appreciate your curiosity and your input. Much better than just accepting a story without looking into it! <3 <3 <3