Between inception and death (aka life); does it matter which side one believes in or is it maybe about the balance in between? If it is about the balance, then who may have a benefit from tricking all others to believe in sides, so that they're busy opposing each other, while ignoring balance (life) for it?
Sounds great Confucius. Please show us the enlightened path forward omnificent one. Demonstrate your omniscience for all the world to see. The natural law which dictates life balance and the undeniable physics of motion shall undoubtedly bring unity to ignorant humans and they shall forever let go of meaningless belief systems and petty differences.
That's you (ONE) consenting by your free will of choice, and in the name of other ONEs (us) to an idol (Confucius) that you believe I offer. That a) puts you in a conflict with those who believe the idol and those who do not believe and b) it puts you in ignorance over your sole authority of self (free will of choice) by consenting to another ONEs offer.
I did not offer any idols; I do not represent an idol, and one does not have to believe anything I write about. Instead it can (your chocie) represent inspiration for you to choose to not ignore yourself as being the ONE within the ALL; instead of happily (sounds great) consenting to be the ONE under another ONE, while ignoring the ALL.
The few control the many only because the many ignore themselves by believing them; consenting to their fictitious offers, while ignoring reality for it.
the enlightened path forward
The path forward is always motion (beginning towards end), and enlightenment represents ONEs comprehension of what ALL perceived means aka ONEs potential to the potentiality of ALL information offered.
Another ONE cannot give you this, for it represents self discernment (a responsibility of self), he may offer it to you, but that just leads to ignorance of self by corrupting ones comprehension with self imposed beliefs.
Demonstrate your omniscience
Everything ONE does (every action set into motion) represents both inspiration and temptation to all other ONEs within motion. It is your responsibility to choose need (inspiration) over want (temptation). Me telling you this creates the temptation to believe me (ignore self) instead of getting inspired by whatever helps to build your comprehension (adhere to self).
for all the world to see.
You want a presentation, while you ignore the ever changing circumstances around us representing the consequences of all actions used to communicate information in form of inspiration/temptation to you: more specifically to all your senses.
ALL information is offered to each ONEs perception within motion at any moment; ONE just lacks the comprehension of what the perceived means.
The natural law which dictates life balance and the undeniable physics of motion
The rules that define how motion operates; define all existence within. Within motion ONE can only perceive the physical consequences of what motion does to creation (consequences of actions set into motion), but ONE can mentally comprehend how motion operates (the laws of nature) by being within motion.
Both together not only represent the balance between mental and physical, but also the required mental foundation to build physical assumptions upon. There's no such thing as truth and false states; only ever change, which means one can only ever make assumptions about things that are constantly changing. That's why all beliefs represent ignorance of motion, because they're affixed aka mental stagnation within a system demanding adaptation.
shall undoubtedly bring unity to ignorant
Doubt represents a) perception of natural opposites and b) free will of choice made in-between them. Ignorance is one choice; adherence to self sustenance the other. Only adherence leads to unity based on shared responsibility of needs aka the fruits of ones labor exponentially outgrowing self sustenance, which creates inspiration for others to help in need, and the temptation to exploit aka balance within motion.
To believe creates a chain of command under another (idolatry aka cult of personality), which is being advertised by them as unity (communist party line), but represents a multitude of isolated selfish shirking responsibility over self onto the false authority of the umbrella idol; controlled in the name of (((others)))
they shall forever let go of meaningless belief systems and petty differences.
Existence is defined by motion; motion defines temptation. That represents forever for all within motion, which means there's no escape from temptation or accumulation of inspiration...only ever the responsibility to balance by choice in between.
Cognitive dissonance implies they experience some form of discomfort as they attempt to reconcile their contradictory beliefs. They do not. This is just doublethink. They will seamlessly and effortlessly switch between these opposing beliefs without even realizing they contradict.
It's called talmudic reasoning...they deliberately apply contradictions to both sides of every belief based conflict.
What does consenting to one side of every belief create? The opposite side. To believe (not what one believes) creates all conflicts in reality, because it represents a conflict about reasoning over fiction, while ignoring reality for it. talmudic reasoning controls the corrupt (fictitious) reasoning of both the believers and the non-believers aka both sides of every conflict.
History existed prior to the creation of the "Talmud".
Correct, yet both his-story and the talmud represent tools for mass population control by deception (suggestion by contract of belief representing offer meets consent under the laws of nature).
One needs to comprehend how control works first to be able to place them. Each of us represents a temporary ONE (potential) within unlimited ALL (potentiality). Why is ALL unlimited? Because The ONEs within are limited to ALL, and so ALL is unlimited to the ONEs within.
Anyway, control originates by ONE claiming "ownership" over that which ALL offers free for all within. We temporary exist within the coexistence of every ONE within ALL, so we can only use ALL; not claim ALL, because we are ONE part of ALL. This is also why the act of claiming ownership represents the temptation of selfishness, based on the free will of choice choosing ignorance over adherence to self sustenance.
Next comes "leadership", which represents ONE claiming ownership over other ONEs. While ownership causes conflict by greed and envy; leadership causes conflict based on ignorance of free will aka ONEs sole authority over self. this creates the next step of control...laws. The leader now has to make up his rules for those he claims ownership over to get them to not rebel against his
false authority.
After those laws comes obviously "law enforcement", where the ONE leader uses force to control the many other ONEs he wants to claim ownership over. During all of this motion corrupts creation, in this case the imbalance of accumulated power within the leader, which represent the inspirations for all others to stop being ignorance of adherence to self.
Now finally control through force leads to the problem of unfavorable odds for the few who want to control the many. Those leaders certainly lost their heads trying to figure that one out, until a question needed to be ask...how do we get them to "believe" to give us what we want without them fighting back. This see where the contract of belief set the stage for religions as the suggestion for ONEs consent towards ignorance of self, and later the tool of "deities" was established to make the idol ONE consented to by believing; having faith; submission etc. into an unquestionable authority over ONE...by making the deity into the one over all.
That is how control works and consent to a contract of belief puts ONE into a conflict between those who believe and those who do not believe the idol, which allows those who offered the contract of beleif to control both sides of every conflict. It has nothing at all to do with what they believe; only that they consent to believe.
Long story short...the talmud represents the few giving the "chosen" the tool for mass population control by maintaining the belief based conflicts (reasoning about believing or not believing aka right or wrong; good or bad, love or hate; truth or false), with those indoctrinate through the talmud, to instead of reasoning about truth or false like the goyim, view the words that describe the world in terms of implications of what they could cause (most of them don't comprehend what words are though, which represents yet another layer of deception).
Anyway, talmudic reasoning controls human reasoning through the use of offered contradiction to both sides of the belief based conflicts.
His-story has a different angle; namely the continuous destruction of creation (destroy the past; exploit the present; corrupt the future) to lower access to inspiration for the ONE limited potential within the unlimited potentiality of ALL, because if enough of us would comprehend that, the few would be left in the dust over night, but alas ignorance is too tempting for our species, and so here we are.
So did evil.
Between inception and death is no conflict; for they are coexisting opposites establishing "life" in between them. These are natural opposites defined by motion creating momentum, which represents balance within motion, which requires opposites to balance in between.
The few are tricking the many to believe in duality, whcih are all belief based on easily to spot, because they're all all against each other. For the few who want to control the many; this represents...division through suggestion. To believe (anything) represents to ignore reality in favor of fiction.
There's no such thing as good or evil...a pedophile represents evil for you, while for him defiling a child represents the epitome of good. Both of you act upon your wants (passing judgement onto others aka claiming ownership over others), while ignoring your needs to sustain self.
This corruption of thing is based on the lie of morality under the laws of men; indoctrinated into you through religions. These are once again easy to spot, because they represent "moral" rules to restrict action, while within reality...ONE represents unrestricted action within ALL, while ONEs free will of choice represents a) ONEs sole authority over self and b) ONEs responsibility over self within ALL to all otehr ONEs.
The balance between need over want is what represents "morality" under the laws of nature, and that is what ONE ignores when ONE choose to consent; have faith; submit to any offered belief.
LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]
Reason, from rhetoric; from word based definitions, made by the assumptions of ONEs about what ALL means; offered towards the consent of others ONES so that they believe them.
"In the beginning was the word..." Remember that? What was the word about, and who could've understood it? Creation requires inspiration first. One cannot create all without inspiration, it is ALL information that communicates itself as inspiration, through motion to each ONE potential within, so that they can create out of.
Nature does NOT use words to define, brand; idolize information; it uses the consequences of actions set into motion as inspiration to ONEs senses. That's why chocie build comprehension of what the perceived information means.
You'll be more helpful than a man with bad logic trying to stop deceptive logic.
Good versus bad is the deception, based on your consent to a contract of belief offered by (((others)))
To be a leftist, you have to completely reject classical reasoning such as the Law of Non-contradiction. Their entire ideology is clownish emotional rage devoid of reasoning.
All actions have consequences within motion...that's a natural law (defined by motion). The free will of choice is about if the action is in adherence to natural law (reality of motion) or in ignorance thereof (fiction of belief).
WITCHCRAFT, [witch and craft.] - Power more than natural.
NATURAL, adjective- [to be born or produced]
I am ONE (to be born or produced]) within ALL (natural) who comprehends (skilled) how ALL operates. That's called having self discernment.
Now riddle me this...Who, Where, and WHY are you? And to really get the noggin joggin...try to define those three between your needs and wants to sustain yourself?
Had this debate with my mother-in-law a few years ago, actually. Tried to get her to see the dissonance between being pro-at-will-abortions, and anti-refusal of vaccines. Her argument was that if you don't get a vaccination, you might catch a disease, then might pass that to someone else, who might get so sick he has to go to the hospital or dies. But abortion is OK, because nobody gets hurt or killed. She still refuses to even acknowledge the argument that human life begins at conception, but is also very quick to call me anti-science for pointing out that environmentalists have been wrong about human caused climate change 100% of the time, and claims she is pro-science because this time they'll SURELY be right.
Which is correct...between beginning (inception) and end (death) all coexists within motion. Conflict is based on one within motion; ignoring motion in favor for a fictitious belief aka an assumption made within motion that is based on the ignorance of motion. Such a belief then proclaimed as "truth" into reality makes all who don't consent by believing it; into "liar". That's how fictitious conflicts operate within a reality of coexistence.
Predator and prey are not in conflict; they're defined by each others coexistence within motion.
They want government control over everything but yet demand freedom against god’s wishes
They don't believe in god, freedom, or logic. They only believe in fear and them having power.
They don't believe in...they only believe in...
Between inception and death (aka life); does it matter which side one believes in or is it maybe about the balance in between? If it is about the balance, then who may have a benefit from tricking all others to believe in sides, so that they're busy opposing each other, while ignoring balance (life) for it?
Sounds great Confucius. Please show us the enlightened path forward omnificent one. Demonstrate your omniscience for all the world to see. The natural law which dictates life balance and the undeniable physics of motion shall undoubtedly bring unity to ignorant humans and they shall forever let go of meaningless belief systems and petty differences.
Confucius. Please show us...
That's you (ONE) consenting by your free will of choice, and in the name of other ONEs (us) to an idol (Confucius) that you believe I offer. That a) puts you in a conflict with those who believe the idol and those who do not believe and b) it puts you in ignorance over your sole authority of self (free will of choice) by consenting to another ONEs offer.
I did not offer any idols; I do not represent an idol, and one does not have to believe anything I write about. Instead it can (your chocie) represent inspiration for you to choose to not ignore yourself as being the ONE within the ALL; instead of happily (sounds great) consenting to be the ONE under another ONE, while ignoring the ALL.
The few control the many only because the many ignore themselves by believing them; consenting to their fictitious offers, while ignoring reality for it.
the enlightened path forward
The path forward is always motion (beginning towards end), and enlightenment represents ONEs comprehension of what ALL perceived means aka ONEs potential to the potentiality of ALL information offered.
Another ONE cannot give you this, for it represents self discernment (a responsibility of self), he may offer it to you, but that just leads to ignorance of self by corrupting ones comprehension with self imposed beliefs.
Demonstrate your omniscience
Everything ONE does (every action set into motion) represents both inspiration and temptation to all other ONEs within motion. It is your responsibility to choose need (inspiration) over want (temptation). Me telling you this creates the temptation to believe me (ignore self) instead of getting inspired by whatever helps to build your comprehension (adhere to self).
for all the world to see.
You want a presentation, while you ignore the ever changing circumstances around us representing the consequences of all actions used to communicate information in form of inspiration/temptation to you: more specifically to all your senses.
ALL information is offered to each ONEs perception within motion at any moment; ONE just lacks the comprehension of what the perceived means.
The natural law which dictates life balance and the undeniable physics of motion
The rules that define how motion operates; define all existence within. Within motion ONE can only perceive the physical consequences of what motion does to creation (consequences of actions set into motion), but ONE can mentally comprehend how motion operates (the laws of nature) by being within motion.
Both together not only represent the balance between mental and physical, but also the required mental foundation to build physical assumptions upon. There's no such thing as truth and false states; only ever change, which means one can only ever make assumptions about things that are constantly changing. That's why all beliefs represent ignorance of motion, because they're affixed aka mental stagnation within a system demanding adaptation.
shall undoubtedly bring unity to ignorant
Doubt represents a) perception of natural opposites and b) free will of choice made in-between them. Ignorance is one choice; adherence to self sustenance the other. Only adherence leads to unity based on shared responsibility of needs aka the fruits of ones labor exponentially outgrowing self sustenance, which creates inspiration for others to help in need, and the temptation to exploit aka balance within motion.
To believe creates a chain of command under another (idolatry aka cult of personality), which is being advertised by them as unity (communist party line), but represents a multitude of isolated selfish shirking responsibility over self onto the false authority of the umbrella idol; controlled in the name of (((others)))
they shall forever let go of meaningless belief systems and petty differences.
Existence is defined by motion; motion defines temptation. That represents forever for all within motion, which means there's no escape from temptation or accumulation of inspiration...only ever the responsibility to balance by choice in between.
Cognitive dissonance implies they experience some form of discomfort as they attempt to reconcile their contradictory beliefs. They do not. This is just doublethink. They will seamlessly and effortlessly switch between these opposing beliefs without even realizing they contradict.
It's called talmudic reasoning...they deliberately apply contradictions to both sides of every belief based conflict.
What does consenting to one side of every belief create? The opposite side. To believe (not what one believes) creates all conflicts in reality, because it represents a conflict about reasoning over fiction, while ignoring reality for it. talmudic reasoning controls the corrupt (fictitious) reasoning of both the believers and the non-believers aka both sides of every conflict.
History existed prior to the creation of the "Talmud".
So did evil.
Try to learn good logic.
You'll be more helpful than a man with bad logic trying to stop deceptive logic.
History existed prior to the creation of the "Talmud".
Correct, yet both his-story and the talmud represent tools for mass population control by deception (suggestion by contract of belief representing offer meets consent under the laws of nature).
One needs to comprehend how control works first to be able to place them. Each of us represents a temporary ONE (potential) within unlimited ALL (potentiality). Why is ALL unlimited? Because The ONEs within are limited to ALL, and so ALL is unlimited to the ONEs within.
Anyway, control originates by ONE claiming "ownership" over that which ALL offers free for all within. We temporary exist within the coexistence of every ONE within ALL, so we can only use ALL; not claim ALL, because we are ONE part of ALL. This is also why the act of claiming ownership represents the temptation of selfishness, based on the free will of choice choosing ignorance over adherence to self sustenance.
Next comes "leadership", which represents ONE claiming ownership over other ONEs. While ownership causes conflict by greed and envy; leadership causes conflict based on ignorance of free will aka ONEs sole authority over self. this creates the next step of control...laws. The leader now has to make up his rules for those he claims ownership over to get them to not rebel against his false authority.
After those laws comes obviously "law enforcement", where the ONE leader uses force to control the many other ONEs he wants to claim ownership over. During all of this motion corrupts creation, in this case the imbalance of accumulated power within the leader, which represent the inspirations for all others to stop being ignorance of adherence to self.
Now finally control through force leads to the problem of unfavorable odds for the few who want to control the many. Those leaders certainly lost their heads trying to figure that one out, until a question needed to be ask...how do we get them to "believe" to give us what we want without them fighting back. This see where the contract of belief set the stage for religions as the suggestion for ONEs consent towards ignorance of self, and later the tool of "deities" was established to make the idol ONE consented to by believing; having faith; submission etc. into an unquestionable authority over ONE...by making the deity into the one over all.
That is how control works and consent to a contract of belief puts ONE into a conflict between those who believe and those who do not believe the idol, which allows those who offered the contract of beleif to control both sides of every conflict. It has nothing at all to do with what they believe; only that they consent to believe.
Long story short...the talmud represents the few giving the "chosen" the tool for mass population control by maintaining the belief based conflicts (reasoning about believing or not believing aka right or wrong; good or bad, love or hate; truth or false), with those indoctrinate through the talmud, to instead of reasoning about truth or false like the goyim, view the words that describe the world in terms of implications of what they could cause (most of them don't comprehend what words are though, which represents yet another layer of deception).
Anyway, talmudic reasoning controls human reasoning through the use of offered contradiction to both sides of the belief based conflicts.
His-story has a different angle; namely the continuous destruction of creation (destroy the past; exploit the present; corrupt the future) to lower access to inspiration for the ONE limited potential within the unlimited potentiality of ALL, because if enough of us would comprehend that, the few would be left in the dust over night, but alas ignorance is too tempting for our species, and so here we are.
So did evil.
Between inception and death is no conflict; for they are coexisting opposites establishing "life" in between them. These are natural opposites defined by motion creating momentum, which represents balance within motion, which requires opposites to balance in between.
The few are tricking the many to believe in duality, whcih are all belief based on easily to spot, because they're all all against each other. For the few who want to control the many; this represents...division through suggestion. To believe (anything) represents to ignore reality in favor of fiction.
There's no such thing as good or evil...a pedophile represents evil for you, while for him defiling a child represents the epitome of good. Both of you act upon your wants (passing judgement onto others aka claiming ownership over others), while ignoring your needs to sustain self.
This corruption of thing is based on the lie of morality under the laws of men; indoctrinated into you through religions. These are once again easy to spot, because they represent "moral" rules to restrict action, while within reality...ONE represents unrestricted action within ALL, while ONEs free will of choice represents a) ONEs sole authority over self and b) ONEs responsibility over self within ALL to all otehr ONEs.
The balance between need over want is what represents "morality" under the laws of nature, and that is what ONE ignores when ONE choose to consent; have faith; submit to any offered belief.
LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]
Reason, from rhetoric; from word based definitions, made by the assumptions of ONEs about what ALL means; offered towards the consent of others ONES so that they believe them.
"In the beginning was the word..." Remember that? What was the word about, and who could've understood it? Creation requires inspiration first. One cannot create all without inspiration, it is ALL information that communicates itself as inspiration, through motion to each ONE potential within, so that they can create out of.
Nature does NOT use words to define, brand; idolize information; it uses the consequences of actions set into motion as inspiration to ONEs senses. That's why chocie build comprehension of what the perceived information means.
You'll be more helpful than a man with bad logic trying to stop deceptive logic.
Good versus bad is the deception, based on your consent to a contract of belief offered by (((others)))
It makes perfect sense when you realize they lie about everything.
2022... Compulsory abortions. (Do your part to help vaccinate others)
The Left doesn't view these choices as mutually exclusive. They are fine with cognitive dissonance and don't lose any sleep over it.
To be a leftist, you have to completely reject classical reasoning such as the Law of Non-contradiction. Their entire ideology is clownish emotional rage devoid of reasoning.
They’ll just say “freedom of choice does not mean freedom from consequences”.
All actions have consequences within motion...that's a natural law (defined by motion). The free will of choice is about if the action is in adherence to natural law (reality of motion) or in ignorance thereof (fiction of belief).
You are really weird.
WEIRD, adjective - Skilled in witchcraft.
WITCHCRAFT, [witch and craft.] - Power more than natural.
NATURAL, adjective- [to be born or produced]
I am ONE (to be born or produced]) within ALL (natural) who comprehends (skilled) how ALL operates. That's called having self discernment.
Now riddle me this...Who, Where, and WHY are you? And to really get the noggin joggin...try to define those three between your needs and wants to sustain yourself?
Forced vaccinations are literally rape
Its just rape and to say otherwise is to deny my leftward islamo-communistic pansexual belief experiences.
"My body, my choice".
"Wear a mask or you're literally killing me!"
in today's increasingly complex and nuanced times, this argument right here is one of the best boil-downs that could be imagined
Had this debate with my mother-in-law a few years ago, actually. Tried to get her to see the dissonance between being pro-at-will-abortions, and anti-refusal of vaccines. Her argument was that if you don't get a vaccination, you might catch a disease, then might pass that to someone else, who might get so sick he has to go to the hospital or dies. But abortion is OK, because nobody gets hurt or killed. She still refuses to even acknowledge the argument that human life begins at conception, but is also very quick to call me anti-science for pointing out that environmentalists have been wrong about human caused climate change 100% of the time, and claims she is pro-science because this time they'll SURELY be right.
Which is correct...between beginning (inception) and end (death) all coexists within motion. Conflict is based on one within motion; ignoring motion in favor for a fictitious belief aka an assumption made within motion that is based on the ignorance of motion. Such a belief then proclaimed as "truth" into reality makes all who don't consent by believing it; into "liar". That's how fictitious conflicts operate within a reality of coexistence.
Predator and prey are not in conflict; they're defined by each others coexistence within motion.
Viruses have no cognitive abilities....or any other good qualities. They only infect and destroy. SARsocialism-COVunism-1848
compulsory abortions is next. Save America.
...or even just "my body my choice" vs mandatory useless face-coverings.