105
Comments (23)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
PieceOfParchment7 2 points ago +3 / -1

I DONT GIVE A FUCK.

DISTRICTS SHOULD NOT FUCKING HAVE RESIDENTS.

I DONT CARE ABOUT YOUR JOB.

DISTRICTS SHOULD NOT FUCKING HAVE RESIDENTS.

0
Blues1813 0 points ago +1 / -1

Districts is an arbitrary name that means nothing. Should the 71st congressional district not have people, if we renamed your county (a division of an area for administrative purposes) a district should we ban people living there. Most people DC do not work for the government, its a pretty big city. Pretty much every other country in the world has their capital in a city where people live. If your arguing that DC is some artificial city created by the government. Well hate to break it to you many western cities are the former location of forts or places the government arbitrarily decided to put a town. The perfectly square counties of most western states were not decided based on natural cultural boundaries. DC is older than the vast majority of towns west of the Mississippi and most towns west of the Appalachians. I agree personally that DC shouldn't get two senators and instead should be incorporated into Maryland and should just give Maryland another house rep and become slightly deeper blue, because everyone in this country should be able to have representation, but DC having two senators would be a little much. That being said DC has more people in Wyoming or Vermont so maybe why not.

1
PieceOfParchment7 1 point ago +2 / -1

The District of Columbia is the administrative area of the country. Nobody should live there.

0
Blues1813 0 points ago +1 / -1

Rome is the administrative area of Italy, London is the administrative area of the UK (and more than DC because the UK isn't a federal system) Pierre is the administrative area of South Dakota, people shouldn't live there.