What's funny/ironic about posts like yours and questions like mine on a site like this are that Catholics refuse to be red-pilled on their doctrine even though the evidence is right there. Or for that matter, NOT there (the Bible).
Tradition doesn't mean a thing in the quest for truth. Truth is truth and that's what we seek here, isn't it?
Following that logic, the Bible is a story. The 3 wise men were stars. Jesus is the Sun. Its pretty easy to see if you dont get bogged down by religious doctrine. There is also zero evidence that any of the stories written are actually true.
No. That's a straw man. I'm not arguing absolute truth and infallibility of the Bible (though I do believe those things).
I'm arguing against Catholic doctrine for which there is no basis found when one reviews the Bible. It's like mormons and jehovah's witnesses and all of them. They believe things revealed through "special revelation" given to their founders. It's not Biblical yet they all say they believe in the Bible.
Where is lent in the Bible?
What's funny/ironic about posts like yours and questions like mine on a site like this are that Catholics refuse to be red-pilled on their doctrine even though the evidence is right there. Or for that matter, NOT there (the Bible).
Tradition doesn't mean a thing in the quest for truth. Truth is truth and that's what we seek here, isn't it?
Following that logic, the Bible is a story. The 3 wise men were stars. Jesus is the Sun. Its pretty easy to see if you dont get bogged down by religious doctrine. There is also zero evidence that any of the stories written are actually true.
No. That's a straw man. I'm not arguing absolute truth and infallibility of the Bible (though I do believe those things).
I'm arguing against Catholic doctrine for which there is no basis found when one reviews the Bible. It's like mormons and jehovah's witnesses and all of them. They believe things revealed through "special revelation" given to their founders. It's not Biblical yet they all say they believe in the Bible.
It was a logical statement based on your statement not a straw man.