3412
Comments (165)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-2
FullAutoFlintlock -2 points ago +4 / -6

...

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-1
FullAutoFlintlock -1 points ago +2 / -3

...

2
DeploraBen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tend to appreciate the military and its personnel, but I agree with you on this one. What needed to be done when the states started certifying clearly fraudulent results is (trying to duck the banhammer here) we needed to invoke a certain 2nd item on a certain list of 10, and carry it out as intended. On one hand, that 2nd item explicitly uses a word that excludes members of a standing military. But on the other, the group defined by that word is traditionally led by former members of the military, and I didn't see any of them coming forward to lead us to what needed to be done. We needed a Washington and got squat. We are the complacent masses, military included.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-4
paskeezy3000 -4 points ago +0 / -4

Lol. FOH. Nobody is sucking your dick for enlisting in the military. Take your virtue signaling ass somewhere else faggot.