1307
Comments (69)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
11
ProfessorOak 11 points ago +11 / -0

I've watched the movie before, and the kid is a part of the movie. Referring to Kubrick's death, why would they still release the film at all if they were willing to go as far as killing him? Not that I doubt that they would kill him, I just think they would make an excuse to not release the movie as well.

21
Quixotic 21 points ago +21 / -0

money obviously

also to mock kubrick’s family and ritualistically show that they are in control

16
Industry4 16 points ago +16 / -0

At that time, it is possible that the 'good guys' were still working behind the scenes. Perhaps the powerful perverts of Hollywood didn't quite own the FBI/DOJ yet and could only do so much. There are a lot of interesting 'coincidences' about Kubrick's death, but I'm still chalking it up as conspiratorial until I see something more substantial.

Btw, Kubrick was an absolute genius filmmaker. He's one of my favs.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
MegoThor 6 points ago +6 / -0

Now that a puppet pedophile sits in the White House they can drop all pretense.

8
Benjanon_Franklin 8 points ago +8 / -0

They actually enjoy flaunting the truth right in front of your face and laughing about it. They feel like it gives them power and makes it impossible for their crimes to be seen by the general population.

4
ParadigmShift2070 4 points ago +4 / -0

You mean like how certain people can proudly say they control the financial, political, entertainment and academic institutions but if you say they same thing they'd send you to jail?