I don't think people should be forced to take it, but I still don't understand why people are against vaccines tbh. We know what's in them and what they do, we know that they're safe. Both my elderly parents have had the vaccine already and bar the bruise on their arms they're fine.
We have a lot of battles we need to fight, this isn't one of them
Even if it's insanely low it's still more of a personal health risk than the perfectly safe vaccines. On top of that by not taking them you're putting other people at risk by potentially spreading it/allowing a mutation to take place.
I mean if enough people don't get the vaccine that may happen thanks to mutations. They have tested it, otherwise it wouldn't be out there being distributed. Governments across the entire world are giving this vaccine out.
No one MAGA is anti-vaxx. This vaccine uses different technology than any other vaccine currently in existence. When they tried to make a vaccine for SARS (think it was this method) they had to pull it, and it never was produced because the downsides were so severe.
Also to note that I have not yet heard they've even isolated the virus, only fragments of it's DNA. If this is the case how can you protect against something you can't even find? There is a lot going on to be skeptical of this particular vaccine. It's a shame you won't even look into it and merely group everyone questioning in the 'anti-vaxx' crazy group.
If enough people get the mRNA vaccine
Then SARS-CoV-2 mutations will not occur
That is not true for Influenza A and other virii, where is your source?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30081492/
FTA "Influenza remains a persistent public health challenge, because the rapid evolution of influenza viruses has led to marginal vaccine efficacy, antiviral resistance, and the annual emergence of novel strains."
And for decades they tried to create a coronavirus vaccine and failed. It caused a condition where upon reexsposure to the virus, the animals in the studies died of massive inflammation.
Reports of cytokine storm occurring weeks or months after the shot is given.
I will not risk that over an illness that has less risk of killing me than the flu, and for which we have good and proven treatments (HCQ, Remdesivir, etc.)
Here's why: zero long term studies. Look up what happened with the dengue fever vaccine from Sanofi. Lots of dead kids because there were zero long term studies.
I don't think people should be forced to take it, but I still don't understand why people are against vaccines tbh. We know what's in them and what they do, we know that they're safe. Both my elderly parents have had the vaccine already and bar the bruise on their arms they're fine.
We have a lot of battles we need to fight, this isn't one of them
What are the odds of a healthy 30 year old dying from covid? People weigh the odds. Nothing wrong with that.
Even if it's insanely low it's still more of a personal health risk than the perfectly safe vaccines. On top of that by not taking them you're putting other people at risk by potentially spreading it/allowing a mutation to take place.
Nope check cdc website, 2.97 % change od death
You’re killing grandma if you don’t take part in the mega bailout of big pharma
I mean if enough people don't get the vaccine that may happen thanks to mutations. They have tested it, otherwise it wouldn't be out there being distributed. Governments across the entire world are giving this vaccine out.
Again, I don't see how being anti-vax helps MAGA
you are dangerously ill-informed - dangerous to your well being and to those in your family. You do not understand that this is not a "vaccine."
No one MAGA is anti-vaxx. This vaccine uses different technology than any other vaccine currently in existence. When they tried to make a vaccine for SARS (think it was this method) they had to pull it, and it never was produced because the downsides were so severe.
Also to note that I have not yet heard they've even isolated the virus, only fragments of it's DNA. If this is the case how can you protect against something you can't even find? There is a lot going on to be skeptical of this particular vaccine. It's a shame you won't even look into it and merely group everyone questioning in the 'anti-vaxx' crazy group.
This ain't no vaccine.
“Gov’ts do it, therefore it must be okay.” Governments have also secretly infected black people with syphilis or sterilized whole cities of people
So, DrWhu, you're saying:
That is not true for Influenza A and other virii, where is your source?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30081492/ FTA "Influenza remains a persistent public health challenge, because the rapid evolution of influenza viruses has led to marginal vaccine efficacy, antiviral resistance, and the annual emergence of novel strains."
This Is Not A Vaccine.
Vaccines are made from weakened/killed versions of a viral strain.
This shot is experimental gene therapy, not a "vaccine." And no, we DON'T know what it does and many experts say it's NOT safe.
That's why some of us are very, very concerned.
And for decades they tried to create a coronavirus vaccine and failed. It caused a condition where upon reexsposure to the virus, the animals in the studies died of massive inflammation.
Reports of cytokine storm occurring weeks or months after the shot is given.
I will not risk that over an illness that has less risk of killing me than the flu, and for which we have good and proven treatments (HCQ, Remdesivir, etc.)
We're only supposed to trust experts if they agree with the globohomo/big pharma agenda.
Here's why: zero long term studies. Look up what happened with the dengue fever vaccine from Sanofi. Lots of dead kids because there were zero long term studies.
It's not only about what is in a vaccine.