3544
Comments (458)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-3
deleted -3 points ago +17 / -20
25
Kottonballs 25 points ago +28 / -3

It’s not a vaccine, it’s a viral agent undergoing human trials. Hundreds of deaths from it and you don’t think it’s dangerous? Wow.

-10
deleted -10 points ago +7 / -17
14
wharfthrowaway 14 points ago +15 / -1

Not even one death. Isn’t that the new rules we’re playing by?

-9
deleted -9 points ago +6 / -15
6
b0ss 6 points ago +7 / -1

Since we have no additional information what does this vaccine we can speculate for now.

But let me tell you, some speculations around the pfizer vaccine does rise questions. Most of these vaccines were financed by speculators such as Bill Gates who put 1 billion dollars in these vaccines which he recently received his interests, approx. 20 billion dollars.

In the past Gates also financed these kind of experimental vaccines in India where more than 50k person has suffered permament paralysis or other effects. These numbers are only from one place in India, when there were more hundreds of stations with similiar or worst conditions.

People have the right and should protest against these kind of vaccines especially when it comes from known speulators such as Gates.

-9
deleted -9 points ago +3 / -12
3
Kottonballs 3 points ago +6 / -3

It hasn't been 30 million and I'm not providing data. Look it up. Either you are fucking lazy or a communist pedophile. Either way, kill yourself.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +5 / -6
3
Kottonballs 3 points ago +5 / -2

Here's info for you when you're taking a break from raping children: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/

10
_deleted_ 10 points ago +13 / -3

I don’t think that this vaccine is dangerous.

Yikes.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +4 / -10
6
_deleted_ 6 points ago +10 / -4

I'd love to see statistical evidence that it isn't. Why are you advertising an experimental gene therapy shot as a vaccine, and why are you promoting an FDA unapproved shot as safe? What the fuck do you know about it? People are very very right to be cautious of anything the government sponsors and rushes out the door. You don't have enough evidence to have the opinion of it "not being dangerous". I'll be skeptical until I see your "statistical evidence", and probably afterword if it comes from a leftist source (hint: it will).

Funny, ever hear of the saying "there's three types of lies; lies, damn lies, and statistics"? In which direction do you think the people standing to profit from a 'vaccine' are going to tilt the scales when it comes to any statistical analysis? Are you one of those people who think big pharma is out to help people and not about a profit? What's the medical industry worth again?

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2
-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
3
sustainable_saltmine 3 points ago +4 / -1

If you don't think you're playing Russian Roulette with this vaccine, you're not paying attention and you're letting the media and "Experts" tell you that any chance there are adverse effects is "misinformation". People HAVE died after getting it, people HAVE gotten Bell's Palsy, people HAVE suffered some form of injury. Are they in the majority? no, but the fact that this so-called "vaccine" still requires you to wear a mask and social distance should be a big clue it doesn't work. So you're basically a lab rat at best

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
-7
deleted -7 points ago +4 / -11
4
incogneato 4 points ago +5 / -1

Reports of cytokine storm occurring weeks or months after the shot is given.

I will not risk that over an illness that has less risk of killing me than the flu, and for which we have good and proven treatments (HCQ, Remdesivir, etc.)

-4
deleted -4 points ago +3 / -7
2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
3
sustainable_saltmine 3 points ago +3 / -0

yep. why get a questionable new vaccine that isn't even at all guaranteed to do anything to protect you, just "we hope it helps somehow", when the virus itself is 99%+ survivable?

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
1
sustainable_saltmine 1 point ago +3 / -2

Surely you can cite me evidence that there are no long term side effects, no one has died, gotten Palsy or suffered any other kind of adverse reaction after having taken the vaccine? I'll wait.

MSM sources don't count because they're biased and in the tank for the Pharma Boys

2
Klaus73 2 points ago +3 / -1

I would consider the fact Pfitzer is in a tissue because India wants to make sure it’s safe. Also over a 1000 VAC filings related to deaths which may be attributed to the vaccine (if ever investigated) while 1000 might not seem big - consider how many vaccinations have occurred thus far.

-7
deleted -7 points ago +3 / -10