Weird. That's exactly what Stalin used to say about the kulaks.
There's a massive difference between being a doormat, and surrendering morality because the end justifies the means in your tiny mind. Your arguments would be better if you didn't engage in reductio ad absurdem to make them.
Stalin said that the kulaks need guns and political power to stop him?
That might not be true
There’s a huge difference between whatever two self serving extremes you choose to trap yourself ... because as we all know life presents itself with clear cut moral and ethical decisions
My argument is not to abandon morality you silly goose ... is that politics (and only politics) doesn’t have an arbiter ... there’s no point in playing by the rules if you don’t control or have a reasonable expectation that the rules will be applied consistently
Weird. That's exactly what Stalin used to say about the kulaks.
There's a massive difference between being a doormat, and surrendering morality because the end justifies the means in your tiny mind. Your arguments would be better if you didn't engage in reductio ad absurdem to make them.
Stalin said that the kulaks need guns and political power to stop him?
That might not be true
There’s a huge difference between whatever two self serving extremes you choose to trap yourself ... because as we all know life presents itself with clear cut moral and ethical decisions
My argument is not to abandon morality you silly goose ... is that politics (and only politics) doesn’t have an arbiter ... there’s no point in playing by the rules if you don’t control or have a reasonable expectation that the rules will be applied consistently
Tell me ... do you feel in control?