3057
Comments (81)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
My2Cents 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hydro can be pretty destructive too. Look at China 3 Gorges Dam. US nearly dammed off the Yosemite Valley for power.

High voltage DC power lines could carry energy long distances for emergencies like the current. Large scale battery backup, like flow batteries and others could level loads too.

New technologies are on the way, ie:

BP and Chevron have led a US$40 million investment round for a Canadian startup that claims to have developed a unique way to extract energy from geothermal heat on demand, using an unpowered looping fluid design that's already prototyped in Alberta.

a single loop can generate "industrial-scale electricity or produce enough heat for the equivalent of 16,000 homes with a single installation." The target cost of energy production is $50 per megawatt-hour. [same price as large-scale solar]

https://newatlas.com/energy/bp-chevron-eavor-geothermal-loop/

2
somethinga9230k 2 points ago +2 / -0

Large scale battery backup, like flow batteries and others could level loads too.

But aren't such solutions currently still very expensive and/or immature and/or have other issues? If there are improvements in such technologies, I believe wind and solar would become much more viable, and I do very much believe that energy storage is an excellent target for more research funding, but as far as I know, it is still at least a ways off.

Geothermal also sounds interesting, though if it is viable, efficient, robust, etc., and how far off it is, I don't know.

1
1
somethinga9230k 1 point ago +1 / -0

..........

Why are you not using archive.is or similar when linking to MSM articles?...

And "starting to enter"... they do sound interesting, but would their costs and their energy density and efficiency be sufficient reg. large-scale energy storage reg. general infrastructure and storing energy from solar/wind? I haven't looked into it, but I would definitely welcome advances. Though one must be careful reg. looking into things and considering them.

1
My2Cents 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry about the links. should start using archive. it's a little more work.

The fact that the sun and the moon deliver inexhaustible power for free make such energy sources very attractive, inevitable. Technology is advancing exponentially; tech singularity due in 35 yrs or so. People won't be burning fossils for long. Many companies are working on mini fusion reactors now, with some predicting 5 year timeline, for example.

New technologies always have their pessimists.

"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." Thomas Watson, president of IBM, 1943.

"Television won't be able to hold on to any market it captures after the first six months. People will soon get tired of staring at a plywood box every night." Darryl Zanuck, executive at 20th Century Fox, 1946

"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home." Ken Olsen, founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977