Real world data is actually wear it DOES matter. Analysis in a controlled environment does not reflect real world applications of masks.
And even says -
"However, these masks would provide the wearers little protection from microorganisms from others persons who are infected with respiratory diseases. As a result, we would not recommend the use of homemade face masks as a method of reducing transmission of infection from aerosols."
I actually have multiple scientific degrees dipshit.
and if your predications in a lab - DONT MATCH REALITY - then you did something wrong in the lab. Because the REAL world is the ULTIMATE LAB ENIVORMENT.
You dumb anti-science cunt.
AND YOUR STUPID FUCKING ARTICLE EVEN SAYS - THAT THEY DONT FUCKING RECOMMEND MASKS AT THE VERY LAST LINE.
Wrong again.
Real world data is actually wear it DOES matter. Analysis in a controlled environment does not reflect real world applications of masks.
And even says -
"However, these masks would provide the wearers little protection from microorganisms from others persons who are infected with respiratory diseases. As a result, we would not recommend the use of homemade face masks as a method of reducing transmission of infection from aerosols."
you have no idea what science is
lab results always trump "real world"
because "real world" isn't controlling variables
it's the whole point of having labs in the first place, idiot
I actually have multiple scientific degrees dipshit.
and if your predications in a lab - DONT MATCH REALITY - then you did something wrong in the lab. Because the REAL world is the ULTIMATE LAB ENIVORMENT.
You dumb anti-science cunt.
AND YOUR STUPID FUCKING ARTICLE EVEN SAYS - THAT THEY DONT FUCKING RECOMMEND MASKS AT THE VERY LAST LINE.