Improvised homemade face masks may be used to help protect those who could potentially, for example, be at occupational risk from close or frequent contact with symptomatic patients. However, these masks would provide the wearers little protection from microorganisms from others persons who are infected with respiratory diseases. As a result, we would not recommend the use of homemade face masks as a method of reducing transmission of infection from aerosols
masks are to protect OTHER PEOPLE
their protection to the wearer is COMPLETELY FUCKING MEANINGLESS
Thats the same myopic psuedo-study you already linked. Which doesnt simulate a real world environment.
Here let me help with you with ACTUAL DATA:
"protective-mask mandates have a poor track record so far in fighting the coronavirus. States with mandates in place produced an average of 10 more reported infections per 100,000 people per day than states without mandates."
wrong
masks are to protect OTHER PEOPLE
their protection to the wearer is COMPLETELY FUCKING MEANINGLESS
you're retarded. congratulations on proving it
Jesus fucking Christ. Its like talking to a child.
We already know that masks dont stop the spread of the disease you myopic little toad brain.
If they were going to work - they would have worked MONTHS ago.
And EVERY single bit of real data analysis shows that - masks made NO AFFECT on the rates of transmission.
You are a tool.
idiot
hard data disproves your stupidity
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7108646/
No dipshit.
Thats the same myopic psuedo-study you already linked. Which doesnt simulate a real world environment.
Here let me help with you with ACTUAL DATA:
"protective-mask mandates have a poor track record so far in fighting the coronavirus. States with mandates in place produced an average of 10 more reported infections per 100,000 people per day than states without mandates."