12
Comments (52)
sorted by:
6
UnemployedMarx 6 points ago +6 / -0

Men weren't evenly split. That's a lie. Men voted for Trump significantly more than Biden and Hillary. What I think they were trying to say is that men voted the same in 2016 as 2020. Evenly split between the two elections.

Removing women's right to vote would fix society up almost immediately.

-5
TwistedSister [S] -5 points ago +1 / -6

I'll be glad to see your evidence on that, but we both know you don't have any.

5
UnemployedMarx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here's one example?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/here-are-the-voter-demographics-for-the-2020-presidential-election/vi-BB1aH4AW?%253BOCID=HPDHP

I dunno, go look into it yourself. I know what I am saying is fact because I looked into the demographics of the 2020 vote already months ago. Also, if Biden's votes were fake, any stats maybe should be taken with a grain of salt?

I take it you're a woman given your name and you want to push the narrative that women are cool voters etc... When you break down the stats, the part I found interesting was that married women voted the same as married men. It was single women who hated Trump the most of any group. Single men actually also voted more for Biden but not as significantly as women.

Women don't need to vote. If you're married to a man then you can still influence politics through your husband. Chances are you both vote roughly the same anyway, as the stats indicate. There really is no reason for women to have the right to vote. Single women voting is a huge problem. Married women vote through their husbands anyway. The outcome for society would be better this way.

-4
TwistedSister [S] -4 points ago +1 / -5

Your link proves exactly what I just said....

https://patriots.win/p/12hRZcUiTj/

-5
TwistedSister [S] -5 points ago +1 / -6

I was very direct at what my point is. My point, again, is that you didn't win because you don't have enough votes. Period.

I don't mind if you want to alienate your allies, women voters. Just don't be shocked when you lose because you don't have enough votes.

5
UnemployedMarx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Maybe I'm bad at math but 49% > 48% thus, Trump wins if women don't vote? Also, I've seen it broken down at a precinct level and Trump wins without a doubt if women don't vote.

-5
TwistedSister [S] -5 points ago +1 / -6

If you want to hang your entire future on 1% winning, I won't stop you. Also, due to the fact that the male vote has been dwindling year after year while all other groups are increasing just ensures even more that you'll lose every time.

3
UnemployedMarx 3 points ago +3 / -0

Correct, I don't think the solution is simply to stop women from voting. It doesn't go far enough. I do believe universal suffrage is a cancer. Personally, if I was designing a voting system it would be the following requirements:

  • Male
  • 30yo minimum
  • 4 years minimum of voluntary military service
  • Must pay net positive taxes
  • Must own land of a reasonable minimum value
  • Must be at least a 3rd generation citizen
  • Must have biological children

I wouldn't be able to vote either but I think if we let only these people vote, our outcomes would likely be better.

-2
TwistedSister [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

You can wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which happens first. I can't think of anything that's a bigger waste of time than to pine away endlessly about something that will never happen.

5
Liam_Clancy 5 points ago +5 / -0

This assumes that the elections are fair and free from fraud, which we know is not the case, so it's a moot point.

-7
TwistedSister [S] -7 points ago +1 / -8

What you do know for a fact is that you didn't win, so that means you don't have the numbers to win.

1
Hanging_Chad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump won

4
TheNakedGenius 4 points ago +4 / -0

Aww that's cute. We're still pretending voting matters

-4
TwistedSister [S] -4 points ago +1 / -5

If you no longer believe that voting matters, that means you live in a dictatorship. So what are you doing about that?

4
loooooof 4 points ago +4 / -0

More fake 'polling'.

-3
TwistedSister [S] -3 points ago +1 / -4

Do you know the difference between a poll and counting actual votes?

4
loooooof 4 points ago +4 / -0

More "experts".

-2
TwistedSister [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

Because counting 1+1 is such a difficult task. It requires a Ph.D.

3
loooooof 3 points ago +3 / -0

More super duper for real voting "results"

-2
TwistedSister [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

I don't care what the facts say. My mind is made up, right?

2
loooooof 2 points ago +2 / -0

More media-driven "facts"

-3
TwistedSister [S] -3 points ago +1 / -4

Still waiting on your evidence. Not interested in your emotional reactions to the evidence.

3
Kamaltoe 3 points ago +3 / -0

WTF is this crap? The gaurdian FFS....

-2
TwistedSister [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

If you have evidence to show otherwise, I'm more than happy to look at it.

3
Kamaltoe 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is not evidence. Its crap. Fucking Leftist crap

-2
TwistedSister [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

Where's your evidence?

1
Tartarian-Kingtwo 1 point ago +2 / -1

We live in a society were women vote based on not being offended instead of being an adult and voting with their brain.

According to the OP women are giant children and probably don't deserve to vote because they're feefees over brains.

Its also not even close to evenly split, haha what a joke. OP must be a veteran troll.

0
TwistedSister [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

You complain about the emotional maturity of women, and you write an emotionally immature post to prove it. Sounds logical.