Except he is. If God created all things, that would mean he created Jesus Christ. This is unless you subscribe to the trinitarian belief, which is refuted by the Bible itself (unless you want to try to rationalize Christ talking to himself).
The fact that you have to resort to "God is unknowable" proves your inability to refute my argument. What would the point of the Bible be if God did not want us to be able to understand him, at least to a certain degree?
Thew only one playing fast and loose with definitions is you.
When did Mormons "attack" Christians?
Again, where are you getting that Mormons believe in "many gods"? Clearly that statement is refuted by their own doctrine. If anything, the Christian denomination that is closest to polytheistic is Catholicism (i.e. praying to saints). Trinitarianism in general is also close to polytheism, comparable to Hindu beliefs about the different incarnations of Vishnu.
The only thing you're defending is sophistry. You haven't been able to support any claim you've made with evidence.
Except he is. If God created all things, that would mean he created Jesus Christ. This is unless you subscribe to the trinitarian belief, which is refuted by the Bible itself (unless you want to try to rationalize Christ talking to himself).
Mormons aren't polytheists.
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/pgp/a-of-f/1?lang=eng
The fact that you have to resort to "God is unknowable" proves your inability to refute my argument. What would the point of the Bible be if God did not want us to be able to understand him, at least to a certain degree?
Thew only one playing fast and loose with definitions is you.
When did Mormons "attack" Christians?
Again, where are you getting that Mormons believe in "many gods"? Clearly that statement is refuted by their own doctrine. If anything, the Christian denomination that is closest to polytheistic is Catholicism (i.e. praying to saints). Trinitarianism in general is also close to polytheism, comparable to Hindu beliefs about the different incarnations of Vishnu.
The only thing you're defending is sophistry. You haven't been able to support any claim you've made with evidence.