It's true though. The planet might have been here for billions of years but by every scientific measure modern humans more or less sprang up from the mud around 80 to 300 thousand years ago depending on the study. Still no solid genetic link with anything else on the planet living or dead past a slight affinity with the early hominids and neanderthals. Science has yet to explain how homo sapiens evolved from either group.
Edit: I see we have some public school educated downvoting this. Ok try this then. Use your favorite search engine and stick this in "missing link between humans and apes found" and marvel and the cornucopia of returns from every source possible and none of them agree with each other. Nearly all are based off morphology or something not genetic and the few genetic studies are inconclusive but spun as correct. I am also not saying creationism is right just saying that no one has a 100% correct and well documented answer.
Everything you just said is false. The genetic link between humans and other great apes is well studied and understood. The genetic link is not only understood but corresponds to morphological and fossil similarities.
The idea that scientists are sitting around scratching their heads here is exactly the kind of lies that creationism is built on. You guys don't propose any ideas or theories, you just heckle from the peanut gallery and treat your religion at the default thing to believe as an alternative.
The study? Like you want one primary study for the whole claim? Look, I know your interest is entirely disingenuous but I'll point you to a few places just in case I'm wrong.
My first recommendation is the book Why Evolution is True by Jerry Coyne. He covers human evolution in a very easy to understand way and cites his claims.
I have already read those studies and dozens and dozens more over the decades. You will notice that nearly every study you can look up rarely agrees with the other studies right? That there seems to be a new study each year coming up with its own reasonings on what they consider the mission link? Theory is all they have and there has yet to be one convincing genetic study done that answers the question of where did homo sapiens come from? The scientific side is just as rooted in opinion and blind faith as the creationist side.
It's true though. The planet might have been here for billions of years but by every scientific measure modern humans more or less sprang up from the mud around 80 to 300 thousand years ago depending on the study. Still no solid genetic link with anything else on the planet living or dead past a slight affinity with the early hominids and neanderthals. Science has yet to explain how homo sapiens evolved from either group.
Edit: I see we have some public school educated downvoting this. Ok try this then. Use your favorite search engine and stick this in "missing link between humans and apes found" and marvel and the cornucopia of returns from every source possible and none of them agree with each other. Nearly all are based off morphology or something not genetic and the few genetic studies are inconclusive but spun as correct. I am also not saying creationism is right just saying that no one has a 100% correct and well documented answer.
Everything you just said is false. The genetic link between humans and other great apes is well studied and understood. The genetic link is not only understood but corresponds to morphological and fossil similarities. The idea that scientists are sitting around scratching their heads here is exactly the kind of lies that creationism is built on. You guys don't propose any ideas or theories, you just heckle from the peanut gallery and treat your religion at the default thing to believe as an alternative.
Are there prime examples of observable evolution?
Appropriate username for your logical comments.
Oh? Then link the study. I'll gladly read it.
The study? Like you want one primary study for the whole claim? Look, I know your interest is entirely disingenuous but I'll point you to a few places just in case I'm wrong.
My first recommendation is the book Why Evolution is True by Jerry Coyne. He covers human evolution in a very easy to understand way and cites his claims.
Here's some primary resources I found. All of these contribute to our broad understanding of the topic https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178954/ https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature04072 https://www.academia.edu/download/49279960/Genetic_Differences_between_Humans_and_G20161001-2050-1snbola.pdf
I have already read those studies and dozens and dozens more over the decades. You will notice that nearly every study you can look up rarely agrees with the other studies right? That there seems to be a new study each year coming up with its own reasonings on what they consider the mission link? Theory is all they have and there has yet to be one convincing genetic study done that answers the question of where did homo sapiens come from? The scientific side is just as rooted in opinion and blind faith as the creationist side.