34 There needs to be a law that Impeachment alone means nothing without a Senate conviction. Or, if they want to play the "two impeachment" penalty game... posted 56 days ago by ManUp 56 days ago by ManUp +34 / -0 how about the Speaker of the House loses all benefits for bringing two bogus impeachments that result in acquittal in the Senate? Makes sense to me. 2 comments share 2 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (2) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 1 ▼ – TwitterIsTrash 1 point 56 days ago +1 / -0 This. You’re not impeached unless both houses impeach you. I’m tired of their pretend impeachments that aren’t legally valid being used in arguments against him. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – consumptiveballerina 1 point 56 days ago +1 / -0 Fuck, why not go for three or ten or fifty impeachment now? permalink save report block reply
This. You’re not impeached unless both houses impeach you. I’m tired of their pretend impeachments that aren’t legally valid being used in arguments against him.
Fuck, why not go for three or ten or fifty impeachment now?