I'm not against what they said. If capital investment can lead to a decrease in operating costs, it's not a bad idea for a facility to look into it.
That said, this kind of thing should only apply at the individual level. A greenhouse using solar power is fine. Trying to run an entire state on it is not.
I'm not against what they said. If capital investment can lead to a decrease in operating costs, it's not a bad idea for a facility to look into it.
That said, this kind of thing should only apply at the individual level. A greenhouse using solar power is fine. Trying to run an entire state on it is not.
Not in a privately owned greenhouse we aren't.
At a presumably private greenhouse?
And subsidies are? Taxpayer dollars
Coal and gas get federal subsidies too, about 300 million a year.
Agree.