4427
Comments (463)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
31
lo_there 31 points ago +31 / -0

Actually you could argue scientifically that water vapor does cause more heat trapping than CO2...Im not kidding.

10
npcipede 10 points ago +10 / -0

I've often wondered if the net effect of humans was global cooling until we started to clean up the particulates from our industrial/heating emissions.

24
JesusMaga 24 points ago +24 / -0

2010’s-2020’s was climate change scam

2000’s-2010’s was global warming scam

1990’s-2000’s was the hole in the ozone layer scam

1980’s-1990’s was acid rain scam

1970’s-1980’s was global cooling scam

15
JudicialDredd 15 points ago +15 / -0

2020 + Were just gunna turn everything off. And you'll like it.

8
TuckerCarlsonsTie 8 points ago +8 / -0

You’ll eat bugs and estrogen laced fake meat, and you’ll like it.

2
SendThemBackToCanada 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, you're so right. This shit is a scam.

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember the heart-wrenching cover picture of a polar bear on a floating ice? That created the illusion of a melting north pole where polar bear became an endangered species. They'd never tell you that polar bears are excellent swimmer. They can swim miles of distance and spent hours in icy water.

6
Ivleeeg 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, the step up in the 70's coincides with clean air laws.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/air-pollutions-upside-a-brake-on-global-warming

1
residue69 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. This is why Bill Gates wants to block out the sun.

10
Thedaythe_redditdied 10 points ago +10 / -0

Hey man your facts aren’t welcome here. Emotions only.

7
Belleoffreedom 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup, it's called cloud cover. If CO2 were was a significant greenhouse gas, its activity would be as detectable as cloud cover.

6
bangbus 6 points ago +6 / -0

CO2 is a small fraction of a percent of the atmosphere. It’s a greenhouse gas but to see the temperature rises we’ve seen there’s no way you can attribute more than a minuscule portion of it to CO2.

2
Jabblemonkey1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Solar activity? Seems like that could raise or lower global temps more easily than anything else.

2
T__X 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish I could remember the exact quote and who said it (Iowahawk maybe?) - but it went something like: "Changing the earth's climate would require a massive variable energy source, something on the order of our own sun."

1
Litecola2 1 point ago +2 / -1

Except that CO2 levels only go up AFTER temperatures do.

2
Hades440 2 points ago +2 / -0

This right here. They have the cause and effect backwards.

The system is self regulating and CO2 levels are part of the mechanism to shift from warming to cooling so how can it also cause warming? It's so stupid.

3
Auroraalpha 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know right? Cant argue with these clowns, except by not producing anything at all.