An actual egalitarian is for equality of opportunity and demands equality under the law. The exact opposites of what marxists are pushing for. It sounds like you were talking to marxists who do what they always do and coopt a name to try and blend in. Same reason why "liberal" is now linked to them and why they took on the mantle of "progressive" back in the early 1900's.
You're welcome to practice your "trick questions" on me if you want to check your story out.
You're obviously not an American. American egalitarians are largely soft cultural Marxists and don't even realize it. They push all tenets of cultural Marxism while living on high to very high middle class incomes. Most of these people are urban dwellers or commute to sub urban areas. I've lived among these people my entire life, I know what makes them tick and I know just how clueless they are of the real world.
An actual egalitarian is for equality of opportunity and demands equality under the law. The exact opposites of what marxists are pushing for. It sounds like you were talking to marxists who do what they always do and coopt a name to try and blend in. Same reason why "liberal" is now linked to them and why they took on the mantle of "progressive" back in the early 1900's.
You're welcome to practice your "trick questions" on me if you want to check your story out.
You're obviously not an American. American egalitarians are largely soft cultural Marxists and don't even realize it. They push all tenets of cultural Marxism while living on high to very high middle class incomes. Most of these people are urban dwellers or commute to sub urban areas. I've lived among these people my entire life, I know what makes them tick and I know just how clueless they are of the real world.
Wrong again. I am indeed a citizen.
This is exactly why I know you were talking to marxists that were doing what they always do. You're describing them, not actual egalitarians.
Okay so lets try a test then. Do you support college admissions that use race criteria for admissions?
No.