3651
Comments (262)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not the point. The point is that no one ever expected signatures on a petition to be 100% (or near) legit.

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one ever expected votes on a ballot to be 100% legit either. Sure people into fraud say there's no fraud, but everybody knows the dice are loaded and everybody rolls with their fingers crossed.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Almost like I typed "(or near)" for a reason too.

1
80960KA 1 point ago +1 / -0

You see really into this double standard existing as a legitimate thing.

1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fuck are you talking about? You're the one sperging out about a petition that never had any guarantees or even allusions to being secure being supposedly the same as an actual election. They aren't. Let them apply the same scrutiny to an actual recall election. Until they do, there is no "double standard" because the two situations aren't the same or even similar enough to matter.