3731
Comments (305)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Spez_Isacuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Too much demand for supply."

"Not enough supply for demand."

There is no difference between these two sentances. They mean exactly the same thing.

1
Rucktoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand that part, but I also know the Texas energy peeps, epcot or whatever, said it was an issue of the grid being overloaded by the demand and the grid could not handle so much power..or at least they implied that.

It seemed they were actually stating they were heroes, and in no way fucked things up.

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well the ERCOT director was at the helm of the Michigan water supply during the Flint crisis, so...

1
Rucktoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

oh shit...seriously?

What the hell was Texas thinking?

1
Spez_Isacuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seriously the bitch doesn't even live in Texas. She's still in Michigan. And her deputy is in Germany auctioning carbon tax credits. It's obscene.