The left does not win its battles in debate. It doesn’t have to. In the twenty-first century, media is everything. The left wins because it controls the narrative. The narrative is controlled by the media. The left is the media. Narrative is everything. I call it the Democrat-media complex.
In all societies, public opinion is determined by the intellectual classes, the opinion moulders of society. For most people neither originate nor disseminate ideas and concepts; on the contrary, they tend to adopt those ideas promulgated by the professional intellectual classes, the professional dealers in ideas. Now, throughout history, [...] despots and ruling elites of States have had far more need of the services of intellectuals than have peaceful citizens in a free society. For States have always needed opinion-moulding intellectuals to con the public into believing that its rule is wise, good, and inevitable; into believing that the “emperor has clothes.
This is as much the Republican parties fault as it is the democrats.. pr is everything. Public relations. Propaganda. The Democrats are very good at it. The Republicans are very bad at it if the Republicans would just get better at it they would already be halfway ther
problem is the Republican party is 90% old dinosaurs. People born during the 16th century who were already 500 years old when Jesus was bor
They don't understand the world. They don't understand that it isn't the same way that it was back when they were only 300..
and because of that they're very bad that public relations. They're very bad at propaganda. We need young people and motivated people and honest people in the Republican party to actually bring it to a decent level.. I see the Republican Party constantly missing out on narrative points. Constantly missing out on opportunities Curate the news cycle.. why? Because they're stupid. They're incapable. We need better leaderss
The great illusion of our days is that democracy and liberalism are the antithesis of communism... This illusion is like saying that a diluted poison is the antithesis of the same poison in its pure and concentrated state
-Juiius Evola
Nothing is more evident than that modern capitalism is just as subversive as Marxism. The materialistic view of life on which both systems are based is identical; both of their ideals are qualitatively identical, including the premises connected to a world the centre of which is constituted of technology, science, production, "productivity," and "consumption." And as long as we only talk about economic classes, profit, salaries, and production, and as long as we believe that real human progress is determined by a particular system of distribution of wealth and goods, and that, generally speaking, human progress is measured by the degree of wealth or indigence—then we are not even close to what is essential
Thus, the true antithesis is not between capitalism and Marxism, but between a system in which the economy rules supreme (no matter in what form) and a system in which the economy is subordinated to extra-economic factors, within a wider and more complete order, such as to bestow a deep meaning upon human life and foster the development of its highest possibilities.
In a nutshell, this is what every conservative — including you, dear reader — needs to do ASAP:
Contact your county Republican Party Committee, find out when and where it or your local district Party Committee meets (terminology varies from state to state), and attend the meeting.
Introduce yourself. Be friendly, polite, and low key. The current officers may be wary of outsiders. Ask if a vacant precinct committeeman position exists for your precinct and volunteer to be appointed to fill it. If no vacancy currently exists (extremely unlikely), volunteer to be a “helper” for the existing precinct committeemen.
Ask for a copy of the precinct committeeman handbook of your state party committee and study it and learn how to run for precinct committeeman in the next election for these positions.
It's a bad idea.. an expert who studies politics his whole career should not be forced to have his vote counted the exact same way as some idiot were only tunes into politics from The Daily show..
And this mentality helped get us here. The country isn't run for the exclusive elitist. It is run for the farmer are gas station employee who just wants to feed his family. And from me and I'm sure close to 100 million other poor idiots, kindly go fuck yourself. If fucking youself isn't to your liking then drive your entitled fucking self into the nearest working neighborhood get out of your car and explain to EVERYONE why they and their interests don't matter faggot.
Republicans are bad at propaganda because they are focused on appeasing the MSM/dems. They had TRUMP who is a master at that art of the troll/branding/propaganda. TRUMP effectively went after both Joe and Hunter, all republicans had to do was STFU, but instead they whine about TRUMP's mean tweets blah, blah, blah...
"The university intellectuals play an important role in carrying on the systems trick. Though they like to fancy themselves independent thinkers, the intellectuals are the most over socialised, the most conformist, the tamest most domesticated, the most pampered, dependent, and spineless group today. As a result, their impulse to rebel is particularly strong. But because they are incapable of independent thought, real rebellion is impossible for them. Consequently they are suckers for the systems trick, which allows them to irritate people and enjoy the illusion of rebelling without ever having to challenge the systems basic values"
And unfortunately it's actually 100% true. Look up communist manifesto, or the 45 goals of Communism and pretty much the only thing left is disarming us.
Written in 1958 and at that time adopted by FBI, CIA, and the White House to understand communism and Soviet Russia. Back in the day when they actually arrested American communists.
Best book I've listened to by far (at work).
I know it's Amazon but in this case it's worth it...
A narrative is just someone narrating the present situation. Literally anyone can narrate. What did they describe Rush Limbaugh as? Someone who can see the truth and paint vivid pictures? A narator!
The Left doesn't control ANY narative. Their actions make people CHANGE THE CHANNEL. People CHOOSE what they watch. WHAT they hear.
Just look at how many followers the Left garners, without manipulation, and you can see how much of a narrative they control - not much at all, if you're playing pretend. Biden's less than 100,000 views on Youtube for fuck's sake?
Gonna run the numbers. A story is released on the internet. It bursts. No time for lies. Just the truth, fast, and fast. Everything fast, once a story hits. You see it all the time - even the corruption spills, because the news goes so fast.
My opinion, there is no controlled narrative - anyone that lies, or bullshits, pays the price, gets tossed aside, one way or another.
The last narrative they tried to control was the Presidential Election, and none of us budged because we WATCHED IT OURSELVES AND SAW THE TRUTH WITH OUR OWN TWO EYES!!! XD
Rating: mostly true. While the hard drive was not obtained illegally, the owner did have to open a laptop to remove it. This could involve screwinhg, unscrewing, prying, and if something is particularly stuck, hacking at it with something.
LOL. Yeah, I could see them twisting logic like that. I am curious, though, how access to the system was done - did Hunter give them the password, like some places ask, to get in, or did dumbs Hunter not have it password protected? I'm not accusing the guy of any wrong doing, however, it's pretty standard for repair places to ask for the security passwords, to get access.
Can't wait for exactly nothing to happen to this cocksucker @Jack.
When does Trump start posting from twatter again, like the rest of his family?
I still don't understand the benefit of enriching and empowering this enemy of free people.
But they all cheered when that bulldyke government employee released Trump stuff. I get it. They want a civil war. They think "love always wins". They will be wrong.
Harrumpf. I remember back when being a hacker was a badge of honor and to have someone call you that was a compliment, reserved only for Gurus and High Voodoo Priests of the digital realm.
Back before Al Gore invented the Internet and AOL turned it stupid.
Why is this being released now? The only new part of the article is the Snopes part, why are media sites jumping on this like it just happened? I made a comment like a month ago that the owner should also add his property spot as a loss because if he was pulling in clients like these he had to have a prime retail spot that he should claim as monetary damages. He isn't getting that address back.
Let's all Pray that God sends Jack Dorsey to Hell ASAP with a Rapid & Deadly form of Cancer. Lets also pray all of his immediate Family gets Cancer too. Amen & Awoman
He should sue Snopes and NYPOST also for slander. I'm pretty sure at least one of their articles painted him as a hacker also
In fact, I'd sue everyone who painted him that way. He should crowdfund legal fees and make it big. He should actually get LIN WOOD but have wood represent him through private 'cut out' type proxies so that this never makes the news, otherwise it will just bring more heat on him AND wood.
Before you say anything about LIn Wood, REMEMBER: he got the boy >50M dollars settlement with the media
As cathartic as seeing "Jack Dorsey Sued" in a headline is, this is a lawsuit that will go nowhere. There are no cognizable damages that the repairman will be able to assert from calling him a hacker.
Damages are presumed with libel so he wouldn't have to prove cognizable damages. Even so, he does mention receiving harm to his business and receiving threats. But I do agree with you that it will go nowhere regardless.
Damages are not presumed in defamation cases, that's 100% backward. Damages are only presumed in defamation per se cases, which are very narrowly defined as a statement that shows a reckless disregard for the truth. One of the four factors that a plaintiff must prove in order to prevail in a defamation case is actual damages caused by the defendant's false statement of fact. This just doesn't come anywhere close to meeting that standard. That's not even to mention the fact that he's claiming that Twitter banning the NY Post for a TOS violation is defamation against him, which no court in the country would buy. Any damages were caused because the NY Post effectively doxxed him by posting a picture of the front of the business in relation to this story.
And despite not being able to show damages, they likely won't be able to succeed on the first point, that Twitter referencing the material as "hacked" was a false statement of fact. Arguing technical definitions of what "hacked" means is not a winning strategy when people colloquially use the term hacked for accessing the material of others, regardless of a legal right. Police can have a warrant to legally access your phone and it would still be common use of the term hacked to say they hacked into the phone to get the material.
This is a loser case. This is a lawyer grifting for money and headlines.
Most jurisdictions consider any form of libel to be libel per se, and therefore damages are in fact presumed. And what you stated is not wholly what defamation per se is. Defamation per se (and libel and slander per se) are statements that fall into 1 of four categories: statements that allege the plaintiff engaged in an act or crime of moral turpitude, the plaintiff has a disease, the plaintiff is unchaste, or the plaintiff engaged in behavior that adversely affects their business professionalism. Whether the statements was made with reckless disregard for the truth applies to dealing with public figures and statements of public concern. This likely would be a statement of public concern concerning a private figure, in which case making the statement with a reckless disregard for the truth can be used to show damages, yes. However, the calling him a "hacker" at the very least is a statement that adversely reflects his business acumen, and might additionally fall under a statement regarding moral turpitude, and therefore defamation per se would be met and actual damages would not need to be shown.
Furthermore, you are making wild presumptions about what a court would or would not buy. The statement in question needs to identify the plaintiff to a reasonable person. If the NY Post received the material in question from the repairmen, and Twitter removed the post for containing hacked material, then logically, Twitter is claiming the repairmen received the material through hacking. This clearly identifies the repairmen as a hacker in this instance. Lastly, I don't know where you get the idea that arguing "technical" definitions is a losing strategy. Almost all legal case law is derived from arguing the technical meanings of words in our laws. It doesn't matter how most people use a word if they're using it incorrectly unless the word has become so far removed from its original definition, which "hacking" has not. I still don't think this case is going anywhere, but it's far from frivolous.
The closest proximate cause was the NY Post doxxing his business by putting it in the story. The people harassing his business would have done it regardless of Twitter banning the NY Post article.
That he had damages doesn't mean the person you sue caused them.
My buddies? Fuck off. Live life ignorant and angry at the world. If you want fairy tales to help you sleep at night then go listen to Q. You'll forget all about how someone tried to help you learn a little bit today and then when this is dismissed you'll whine and whine about how the system is rigged. Things don't happen just because you want them to happen. You need to wipe your nose and put your big boy pants on if you ever want to be useful.
I'd also go further and say the Left is controlled by their own ideas, possessed even.
This is as much the Republican parties fault as it is the democrats.. pr is everything. Public relations. Propaganda. The Democrats are very good at it. The Republicans are very bad at it if the Republicans would just get better at it they would already be halfway ther
problem is the Republican party is 90% old dinosaurs. People born during the 16th century who were already 500 years old when Jesus was bor
They don't understand the world. They don't understand that it isn't the same way that it was back when they were only 300..
and because of that they're very bad that public relations. They're very bad at propaganda. We need young people and motivated people and honest people in the Republican party to actually bring it to a decent level.. I see the Republican Party constantly missing out on narrative points. Constantly missing out on opportunities Curate the news cycle.. why? Because they're stupid. They're incapable. We need better leaderss
-Julius Evola
-Julius Evola
wow quote master g, have any of your own thoughts?
His quotes are better than your quip...
The republican party was seized by Marxists long ago. They don't share the same beliefs as us... They merely pretend to.
We will take it back.
In a nutshell, this is what every conservative — including you, dear reader — needs to do ASAP:
If you think about it the idea that every vote should have the same weight is a form of radical egalitarianism.
It's a bad idea.. an expert who studies politics his whole career should not be forced to have his vote counted the exact same way as some idiot were only tunes into politics from The Daily show..
And this mentality helped get us here. The country isn't run for the exclusive elitist. It is run for the farmer are gas station employee who just wants to feed his family. And from me and I'm sure close to 100 million other poor idiots, kindly go fuck yourself. If fucking youself isn't to your liking then drive your entitled fucking self into the nearest working neighborhood get out of your car and explain to EVERYONE why they and their interests don't matter faggot.
Republicans are bad at propaganda because they are focused on appeasing the MSM/dems. They had TRUMP who is a master at that art of the troll/branding/propaganda. TRUMP effectively went after both Joe and Hunter, all republicans had to do was STFU, but instead they whine about TRUMP's mean tweets blah, blah, blah...
"The university intellectuals play an important role in carrying on the systems trick. Though they like to fancy themselves independent thinkers, the intellectuals are the most over socialised, the most conformist, the tamest most domesticated, the most pampered, dependent, and spineless group today. As a result, their impulse to rebel is particularly strong. But because they are incapable of independent thought, real rebellion is impossible for them. Consequently they are suckers for the systems trick, which allows them to irritate people and enjoy the illusion of rebelling without ever having to challenge the systems basic values"
T. Kaczynski - Industrial Society and its Future
One might use the word "deranged"
Right! It's classic Jung - we don't have ideas, ideas have us...
I'd say you're wrong... Because time left is actually controlled by Karl Marx ideas
I stand corrected
And unfortunately it's actually 100% true. Look up communist manifesto, or the 45 goals of Communism and pretty much the only thing left is disarming us.
What else do you suggest reading? I've read the Communists Manifesto.
Read:
"The Naked Communist" by ex FBI W. Cleon Skousen.
Written in 1958 and at that time adopted by FBI, CIA, and the White House to understand communism and Soviet Russia. Back in the day when they actually arrested American communists.
Best book I've listened to by far (at work).
I know it's Amazon but in this case it's worth it...
https://a.co/5AXpqt5
Thank you, fren. I LOVE reading, so books are my primary way of learning.
The DNC killed Andrew, I don't give a shit what anyone says.
EhhhhHHhh.
A narrative is just someone narrating the present situation. Literally anyone can narrate. What did they describe Rush Limbaugh as? Someone who can see the truth and paint vivid pictures? A narator!
The Left doesn't control ANY narative. Their actions make people CHANGE THE CHANNEL. People CHOOSE what they watch. WHAT they hear.
Just look at how many followers the Left garners, without manipulation, and you can see how much of a narrative they control - not much at all, if you're playing pretend. Biden's less than 100,000 views on Youtube for fuck's sake?
Gonna run the numbers. A story is released on the internet. It bursts. No time for lies. Just the truth, fast, and fast. Everything fast, once a story hits. You see it all the time - even the corruption spills, because the news goes so fast.
My opinion, there is no controlled narrative - anyone that lies, or bullshits, pays the price, gets tossed aside, one way or another.
The last narrative they tried to control was the Presidential Election, and none of us budged because we WATCHED IT OURSELVES AND SAW THE TRUTH WITH OUR OWN TWO EYES!!! XD
Snopes claim: it was hacked
Rating: mostly true. While the hard drive was not obtained illegally, the owner did have to open a laptop to remove it. This could involve screwinhg, unscrewing, prying, and if something is particularly stuck, hacking at it with something.
LOL. Yeah, I could see them twisting logic like that. I am curious, though, how access to the system was done - did Hunter give them the password, like some places ask, to get in, or did dumbs Hunter not have it password protected? I'm not accusing the guy of any wrong doing, however, it's pretty standard for repair places to ask for the security passwords, to get access.
You answered your own question bub
Is that really what snopes said? <facepalm>
Sue his ass!
This is the USSA. You can't be found guilty if you are sympathetic to communism, or have aided the illegitimate regime.
Well, we all know the courts are corrupt. Hope the repairman wins...
Snopes fail=snopes failed to do a fact check and bring it to Dorsey's attention.
Perhaps the internal discussion was:
"We need to do a cover-up for Hunter so the big guy is elected... we'll call it hacked and pay the repairman later for his trouble."
Lie when it counts, pretend to apologize later.
How about this: I don't give a FUCK if it was hacked. It was AUTHENTIC.
Can't wait for exactly nothing to happen to this cocksucker @Jack. When does Trump start posting from twatter again, like the rest of his family? I still don't understand the benefit of enriching and empowering this enemy of free people.
Advanced condolences, for this guy’s business burning to the ground.
already has... i hope he gets billions
Bury the cocksuckers at Twitter. Take every last dime.
I hope John Paul Mac wins big on this one, sue the f'ing shit out of Twitter and Jack D.
Sue the "fact checkers" and the fake news media as well.
But they all cheered when that bulldyke government employee released Trump stuff. I get it. They want a civil war. They think "love always wins". They will be wrong.
Twitter effectively forced repairman out of business, only fair that the civil penalties force Twitter out of business too.
Harrumpf. I remember back when being a hacker was a badge of honor and to have someone call you that was a compliment, reserved only for Gurus and High Voodoo Priests of the digital realm.
Back before Al Gore invented the Internet and AOL turned it stupid.
BYE BYE TWITTER & FACT-CHECKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I love this
Where is a good lawyer when there is a crying need.
Hehe, when this is over I want Jack to talk about his ordeal slowly and in detail.
i hope he sues the idiot booger ring off him
You love to see it.
Why is this being released now? The only new part of the article is the Snopes part, why are media sites jumping on this like it just happened? I made a comment like a month ago that the owner should also add his property spot as a loss because if he was pulling in clients like these he had to have a prime retail spot that he should claim as monetary damages. He isn't getting that address back.
Twitter is making lefties even dumber and less connected to reality.
Let's all Pray that God sends Jack Dorsey to Hell ASAP with a Rapid & Deadly form of Cancer. Lets also pray all of his immediate Family gets Cancer too. Amen & Awoman
The narrative is one thing, the courts are another. Repairman is suing twit for false "hacker" allegations...bring in JUSTICE!
He needs to Gawker those assholes.
It's almost as if Snopes exists to uphold certain narratives. Or something.
I hope he gets it all. Fuck Jack
Snopes: it was material and it was distributed, therefore, the claim that the repairman distributed hacked material is MOSTLY TRUE
I think 200 million will make the pain he has suffered go away and get him some security.
Jack...is over....soon.
The minute snopes got into the political field, they lost all credibility. Should have stuck with urban legends.
BIG TECH IS THE BIG FUCKIN' PROBLEM.
I hope someone is going to tell us what the outcome is! On here!
He should sue Snopes and NYPOST also for slander. I'm pretty sure at least one of their articles painted him as a hacker also
In fact, I'd sue everyone who painted him that way. He should crowdfund legal fees and make it big. He should actually get LIN WOOD but have wood represent him through private 'cut out' type proxies so that this never makes the news, otherwise it will just bring more heat on him AND wood.
Before you say anything about LIn Wood, REMEMBER: he got the boy >50M dollars settlement with the media
Little victories to comfort the right. It’s working.
As cathartic as seeing "Jack Dorsey Sued" in a headline is, this is a lawsuit that will go nowhere. There are no cognizable damages that the repairman will be able to assert from calling him a hacker.
Damages are presumed with libel so he wouldn't have to prove cognizable damages. Even so, he does mention receiving harm to his business and receiving threats. But I do agree with you that it will go nowhere regardless.
Damages are not presumed in defamation cases, that's 100% backward. Damages are only presumed in defamation per se cases, which are very narrowly defined as a statement that shows a reckless disregard for the truth. One of the four factors that a plaintiff must prove in order to prevail in a defamation case is actual damages caused by the defendant's false statement of fact. This just doesn't come anywhere close to meeting that standard. That's not even to mention the fact that he's claiming that Twitter banning the NY Post for a TOS violation is defamation against him, which no court in the country would buy. Any damages were caused because the NY Post effectively doxxed him by posting a picture of the front of the business in relation to this story.
And despite not being able to show damages, they likely won't be able to succeed on the first point, that Twitter referencing the material as "hacked" was a false statement of fact. Arguing technical definitions of what "hacked" means is not a winning strategy when people colloquially use the term hacked for accessing the material of others, regardless of a legal right. Police can have a warrant to legally access your phone and it would still be common use of the term hacked to say they hacked into the phone to get the material.
This is a loser case. This is a lawyer grifting for money and headlines.
Most jurisdictions consider any form of libel to be libel per se, and therefore damages are in fact presumed. And what you stated is not wholly what defamation per se is. Defamation per se (and libel and slander per se) are statements that fall into 1 of four categories: statements that allege the plaintiff engaged in an act or crime of moral turpitude, the plaintiff has a disease, the plaintiff is unchaste, or the plaintiff engaged in behavior that adversely affects their business professionalism. Whether the statements was made with reckless disregard for the truth applies to dealing with public figures and statements of public concern. This likely would be a statement of public concern concerning a private figure, in which case making the statement with a reckless disregard for the truth can be used to show damages, yes. However, the calling him a "hacker" at the very least is a statement that adversely reflects his business acumen, and might additionally fall under a statement regarding moral turpitude, and therefore defamation per se would be met and actual damages would not need to be shown.
Furthermore, you are making wild presumptions about what a court would or would not buy. The statement in question needs to identify the plaintiff to a reasonable person. If the NY Post received the material in question from the repairmen, and Twitter removed the post for containing hacked material, then logically, Twitter is claiming the repairmen received the material through hacking. This clearly identifies the repairmen as a hacker in this instance. Lastly, I don't know where you get the idea that arguing "technical" definitions is a losing strategy. Almost all legal case law is derived from arguing the technical meanings of words in our laws. It doesn't matter how most people use a word if they're using it incorrectly unless the word has become so far removed from its original definition, which "hacking" has not. I still don't think this case is going anywhere, but it's far from frivolous.
Other than his business being destroyed, forcing him to retool as a carpenter
No biggie
None of which was caused by calling him a hacker.
Ok, then what destroyed his life? A lightning strike? Alcohol? Porn addiction - oh wait, that might be from the laptop too...
The closest proximate cause was the NY Post doxxing his business by putting it in the story. The people harassing his business would have done it regardless of Twitter banning the NY Post article.
That he had damages doesn't mean the person you sue caused them.
Bunch of hogwash. Those that lied about him goaded the sick leftists (your buddies) to attack him.
You are responsible, at the behest of Jack
My buddies? Fuck off. Live life ignorant and angry at the world. If you want fairy tales to help you sleep at night then go listen to Q. You'll forget all about how someone tried to help you learn a little bit today and then when this is dismissed you'll whine and whine about how the system is rigged. Things don't happen just because you want them to happen. You need to wipe your nose and put your big boy pants on if you ever want to be useful.
Nothing ever happens 😕
Ok shill. You've revealed yourself. Go back to r/politics now, K?