3409
Comments (98)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
91
RonPaulPatriot 91 points ago +94 / -3

Voting requirements:

  1. At least 28 y/o

  2. Lived in the US for 10 years

  3. Net taxpayer

4 Competency test on constitution

  1. Denounce Marxism

  2. Gun owner

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
33
Bball-gurl 33 points ago +33 / -0

no representation without taxation

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
24
LesboPregnancyScare 24 points ago +24 / -0

I also believe if you are not a net tax payer you shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

yep. people who receive handouts always vote for more handouts. its not rocket surgery.

9
Lifted71 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'll have them ni***rs voting democrat for the next 200 years.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
labajada 17 points ago +17 / -0

why "unless you served in the military"? It's been shown that the military is just a private police force for warmongering globalists. They did not come through to save America from the infiltrated commies and they can suck a dick.

9
RussianBot4Trump 9 points ago +9 / -0

Disabled combat veteran here. I agree. The brainwashing is real and I wish I knew then what I know now.

I was young, naive, and wanted to serve after the 9/11 bullshit. It’s been a hard pill to swallow, and I’ve always been a “conservative.”

So yes, my former self should have gone and suck a dick. It would have been easier to do.

Also, military leadership can go get fucked, and I’m not talking about the enjoyable kind. I’m talking about the raw dog in the ass tear apart the rectum with sandpaper kind.

9
Roadpower 9 points ago +9 / -0

The funny thing about that is that women on aggregate NEVER become NET tax payers. That is a little known fact.

11
deleted 11 points ago +14 / -3
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
simpson5774 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree and this probably semantics but wouldn't that screw over people who write off a bunch of shit for work purposes? or say someone who owns a house outright and is living off of accrued assets? Maybe I am not thinking that one through.

Modifications:

Military service allows you to vote after you make it through bootcamp and are in good standing. Residential property ownership lowers that number to 25. Its 25 years if you are in immigrant unless one of your parents has been a citizen for 25 years or you own property or served in the military then it is 10 years. Gun ownership is mandatory and a small stipend is provided at 25 years old unless a felon or the person willingly relinquishes the right to gun ownership due to mental health reasons.

I also think there should be some sort of non military conscription - but someone may argue that it would go against the idea of liberty for a law abiding citizen... but I think our country would be a better place if we had some sort of force that worked on large scale infrastructure projects - give them boot camp, house them, pay them whatever shitty pay they give to military grunts - have them learn what it takes to build a road or bridge or dam.

2
RonPaulPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice ideas there, the only one I am not a huge fan of is forcing an individual to do something by threat of violence from the state.

12
drsowells1fan 12 points ago +13 / -1
  1. Proficient in English.
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
posedgeclk 8 points ago +8 / -0

DiSenfRaNchIZEMinT reeEEEEeeeee. This be a demokrazy reeeeee!!

4
liberpede 4 points ago +4 / -0

Your test sounds like it would do the job.

I have a proposal for a quicker test:

Do a brain scan whole you explain how UPS eliminated all of the left turns and backing up from their routes.

If their brain lights up, thinking about how that could be accomplished, and why you would want to do it, you have a voter.

If it gives the equivalent of the eyes glazed over vacant stare, next, please!

If they have the curiosity to wonder about first and second order consequences of strange sounding policies implemented in complex systems...

You can probably assume 3-6 on your list.