36
Comments (19)
sorted by:
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
p1smo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Everyone predicted it. What people didn't predict was the entire government, including the Supreme Court, being in on the take.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
p1smo 4 points ago +4 / -0

They weren't challenging the fraud directly, they were challenging states unconstitutionally bypassing their legislatures and federal election laws to allow mail-ins. It was absolutely an unprecedented situation, and at the very least the case should have heard.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
p1smo 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think that argument could be pretty easily turned on its head, that our country has faced adverse situations many times before, but that's no excuse for suspending the rule of law, especially in regards to election integrity. There's no end to that line of thinking. Laws either have meaning, or they don't.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
p1smo 3 points ago +3 / -0

However legislatures should have turned it on its head.

I don't disagree at all, but I can't agree with the case not being heard on a technicality, or that it should've been handled at the state level. Certain issues are so pressing they demand immediate reconciliation. They have no issue calling special sessions over DACA or gay marriage; why not election integrity?

2
deleted 2 points ago +6 / -4
1
RyanUpCreek 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are the voice of our movement. Not some central figure to place trust in. Donald Trump placed his trust in us and we are on the move.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-12
d3plor4ble -12 points ago +1 / -13

^ this faggot is a white supremacist who denies the Holocaust

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
-8
d3plor4ble -8 points ago +1 / -9

I'm gonna get you banned nazifag

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
-8
d3plor4ble -8 points ago +1 / -9

EAT SHIT AND DIE NEO-NAZI FAGGOT