Most evolutionists hinge on some belief about shared ancestry. This DOES NOT prove evolution. It's backwards. There is NO evidence for a working, functional evolution. And, in fact, all of the "evidence" for common ancestry can be attributed to common Design elements. If you can't solve the problem going forward, to where it actually becomes useful, and real, then you believe in a new age fairy tale, taken all together. A false religion of so-called science that is a DILLUSION. Fate is not without a sense of irony, I suppose. The Bible has always made the same claim about what it is, and where it comes from, and still stands firm on testable, repeatable, observable scientific phenomena.
Comments (76)
sorted by:
Heredity yes. Differentiation of species yes. Adaptation of species yes. The environment (and especially fluctuations in climate) is the major driver of adaptation or extinction. This is yes.
"Evolution" as you describe it, explains changes within the species. Yes, species evolve.
"That species descend from other species" NO
There is zero evidence suggesting a genetic mutation (the only biological mechanism by which the theory could work) caused self awareness, or at the very least is responsible for the overwhelming diversity of millions of life forms on earth. It's as silly as believing the fossil fuel myth.
Agenda driven propaganda buddy
Species could descend/change from other species even without genetic mutation (gaining a gene variant that neither parent has). That would be through large scale movement of a subpopulation of a species to a differing environment, where over time they adapt enough differing traits that they no longer fully resemble their "original" species (the animals that stayed in the previous environment and did not leave). The more generations that pass, the less they will resemble the species they "branched" off from. Eventually they would be genetically different enough to be considered a different species. This would resemble the branching of the tree of life charts, and fit the "last common ancestor" paradigm. It can potentially explain all species origination through the natural selection model.
You are desrcibing the mechanism of adaptation and differentiation within a species, yes. One twig, on one branch. Taxonomy. All variations of a species.
Not "resembling" and "potentially explaining" is just wish wash logical fallacy. No offense.
We are being lied to in many ways. The theory as promulgated is merely one example of bullshit.
If you apply the same process over billions of years, then you get massive distinction between various species. Don't forget, humans share over half (closer to 70%) of genes with most fish. It would be very unlikely to have 70% shared DNA if they weren't descended from a common ancestor.
Humans share 99% of genes with chimpanzees. The statistical probability of 2 completely separate animals developing 99% shared DNA without any relation to each other would be extremely low.
Ah yes, another hoax, like fossil fuels, that only "works" within the "billions of years" timeframe for human existence (and I think it's only "millions" of years for animal species anyway). Once you realize the geologic column is another dirty hoax and that dating methods beyond a few thousand years are worthless (and assume uniformitarianism anyway), you'll really travel down the rabbit hole. The truth is the Royal Society concocted this vicious sham in the 19th century to justify their exploitation of subject peoples, further dehumanize the poor, and, as Huxley said, to gratify their sexual passions.
There is no finding in nature or science that shows any genetic gain through adaptation. None. It's all loss. And if you really think about the "gain" of an appendage, you'll see you're basically assuming the odds of something that is effectively zero happening all the time throughout billions of years. Evolution must thread a needle across the span of millions of miles over and over and over, millions of times, perfectly. If it happened just so, where is it now? Why hasn't, literally, any of the biological mechanism for genetic adaptation been harnessed or even found in the lab? All the change we see is horizontal, and evolution is a delusion.