Most evolutionists hinge on some belief about shared ancestry. This DOES NOT prove evolution. It's backwards. There is NO evidence for a working, functional evolution. And, in fact, all of the "evidence" for common ancestry can be attributed to common Design elements. If you can't solve the problem going forward, to where it actually becomes useful, and real, then you believe in a new age fairy tale, taken all together. A false religion of so-called science that is a DILLUSION. Fate is not without a sense of irony, I suppose. The Bible has always made the same claim about what it is, and where it comes from, and still stands firm on testable, repeatable, observable scientific phenomena.
Comments (76)
sorted by:
If you apply the same process over billions of years, then you get massive distinction between various species. Don't forget, humans share over half (closer to 70%) of genes with most fish. It would be very unlikely to have 70% shared DNA if they weren't descended from a common ancestor.
Humans share 99% of genes with chimpanzees. The statistical probability of 2 completely separate animals developing 99% shared DNA without any relation to each other would be extremely low.
Ah yes, another hoax, like fossil fuels, that only "works" within the "billions of years" timeframe for human existence (and I think it's only "millions" of years for animal species anyway). Once you realize the geologic column is another dirty hoax and that dating methods beyond a few thousand years are worthless (and assume uniformitarianism anyway), you'll really travel down the rabbit hole. The truth is the Royal Society concocted this vicious sham in the 19th century to justify their exploitation of subject peoples, further dehumanize the poor, and, as Huxley said, to gratify their sexual passions.