Most evolutionists hinge on some belief about shared ancestry. This DOES NOT prove evolution. It's backwards. There is NO evidence for a working, functional evolution. And, in fact, all of the "evidence" for common ancestry can be attributed to common Design elements. If you can't solve the problem going forward, to where it actually becomes useful, and real, then you believe in a new age fairy tale, taken all together. A false religion of so-called science that is a DILLUSION. Fate is not without a sense of irony, I suppose. The Bible has always made the same claim about what it is, and where it comes from, and still stands firm on testable, repeatable, observable scientific phenomena.
Comments (76)
sorted by:
Additionally, to illustrate how the "science" of evolution is not science because it has no predictive quality, one could ask: what are humans, or elephants, or horses, or dogs turning into?
You might try to say something about how the seasonal flu vaccine is derived from predictions about the changes in the next seasons strain, but what is the virus turning into? It does not EVER stop being a virus, so long as it is not extinct. There is no evidence that the change we observe is beyond variation contained within a given creature. That variation may very well be, for all intents and purposes, infinite, BUT it does not change form. Evolutionists see the design rationality in God's creation, a matrix of biological agents, and fills in the HUGE blanks with it's own ostensibly rational godless narrative.
I know it wouldn't matter if it were true, but this DOES fuel the left. Evolution is not true, so all you're doing is aiding your enemy.
You don't understand how this works. No instance of a lifeform is evolving. Every instance lives its one life and replicates or does not. If it has more offspring than another instance - the code that was generated in that recombination has a higher likelyhood of taking over in a breeding population. Over time - this results in different species.
But at no time is one instance turning into another.
We have pretty much fucked evolution for all the animal and plant populations we manage. Their selective pressure is us - and we can breed them in ways that are evolutionarily impossible. We will be guiding our own destiny when it comes to any changes that predominate - but it will be engineering unless there is a collapse of civilization.
That is not how anything works. The virus is not "turning into" anything. A random variation will emerge in an instance that gives it a slight reproductive advantage. That slight advantage makes it the predominant variant infecting humans for a season.
But its ecological niche - where they can succeed - is in the lung and tracheal tissue of some bird species and humans. They are constantly changing but the only ones that can successfully infect emerge in predominance.
And again the label "virus" is a whole class of code. If you actually looked at their codebase - there is CONSTANT change in any instance. no two instances are identical in a single organism. But those small changes are constrained to be able to build viruses. If a change happens that stops the virus from being able to load into the shell - or a change happens that makes it have a non-functional receptor structure - that virus's changes will never make it to a new generation to test. They get deleted from the population.